Cargando…

Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders

BACKGROUND: Digital image (DI) analysis avoids visual subjectivity in interpreting immunohistochemical stains and provides more reproducible results. An automated procedure consisting of two variant methods for quantifying the cytokeratin-19 (CK19) marker in breast cancer tissues is presented. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callau, Cristina, Lejeune, Marylène, Korzynska, Anna, García, Marcial, Bueno, Gloria, Bosch, Ramon, Jaén, Joaquín, Orero, Guifré, Salvadó, Teresa, López, Carlos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26329009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-14-S2-S2
_version_ 1782387046579437568
author Callau, Cristina
Lejeune, Marylène
Korzynska, Anna
García, Marcial
Bueno, Gloria
Bosch, Ramon
Jaén, Joaquín
Orero, Guifré
Salvadó, Teresa
López, Carlos
author_facet Callau, Cristina
Lejeune, Marylène
Korzynska, Anna
García, Marcial
Bueno, Gloria
Bosch, Ramon
Jaén, Joaquín
Orero, Guifré
Salvadó, Teresa
López, Carlos
author_sort Callau, Cristina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Digital image (DI) analysis avoids visual subjectivity in interpreting immunohistochemical stains and provides more reproducible results. An automated procedure consisting of two variant methods for quantifying the cytokeratin-19 (CK19) marker in breast cancer tissues is presented. METHODS: The first method (A) excludes the holes inside selected CK19 stained areas, and the second (B) includes them. 93 DIs scanned from complete cylinders of tissue microarrays were evaluated visually by two pathologists and by the automated procedures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There was good concordance between the two automated methods, both of which tended to identify a smaller CK19-positive area than did the pathologists. The results obtained with method B were more similar to those of the pathologists; probably because it takes into account the entire positive tumoural area, including the holes. However, the pathologists overestimated the positive area of CK19. Further studies are needed to confirm the utility of this automated procedure in prognostic studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4547150
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45471502015-09-10 Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders Callau, Cristina Lejeune, Marylène Korzynska, Anna García, Marcial Bueno, Gloria Bosch, Ramon Jaén, Joaquín Orero, Guifré Salvadó, Teresa López, Carlos Biomed Eng Online Research BACKGROUND: Digital image (DI) analysis avoids visual subjectivity in interpreting immunohistochemical stains and provides more reproducible results. An automated procedure consisting of two variant methods for quantifying the cytokeratin-19 (CK19) marker in breast cancer tissues is presented. METHODS: The first method (A) excludes the holes inside selected CK19 stained areas, and the second (B) includes them. 93 DIs scanned from complete cylinders of tissue microarrays were evaluated visually by two pathologists and by the automated procedures. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: There was good concordance between the two automated methods, both of which tended to identify a smaller CK19-positive area than did the pathologists. The results obtained with method B were more similar to those of the pathologists; probably because it takes into account the entire positive tumoural area, including the holes. However, the pathologists overestimated the positive area of CK19. Further studies are needed to confirm the utility of this automated procedure in prognostic studies. BioMed Central 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4547150/ /pubmed/26329009 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-14-S2-S2 Text en Copyright © 2015 Callau et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Callau, Cristina
Lejeune, Marylène
Korzynska, Anna
García, Marcial
Bueno, Gloria
Bosch, Ramon
Jaén, Joaquín
Orero, Guifré
Salvadó, Teresa
López, Carlos
Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
title Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
title_full Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
title_fullStr Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
title_short Evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
title_sort evaluation of cytokeratin-19 in breast cancer tissue samples: a comparison of automatic and manual evaluations of scanned tissue microarray cylinders
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547150/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26329009
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-925X-14-S2-S2
work_keys_str_mv AT callaucristina evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT lejeunemarylene evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT korzynskaanna evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT garciamarcial evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT buenogloria evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT boschramon evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT jaenjoaquin evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT oreroguifre evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT salvadoteresa evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders
AT lopezcarlos evaluationofcytokeratin19inbreastcancertissuesamplesacomparisonofautomaticandmanualevaluationsofscannedtissuemicroarraycylinders