Cargando…

Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness

OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological intervention used to manage pain using skin surface electrodes. Optimal electrode placement is unclear. We hypothesized that better analgesia would occur if electrodes were placed over sites with lower skin impedan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vance, Carol GT, Rakel, Barbara A, Dailey, Dana L, Sluka, Kathleen A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26316808
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S86577
_version_ 1782387088278159360
author Vance, Carol GT
Rakel, Barbara A
Dailey, Dana L
Sluka, Kathleen A
author_facet Vance, Carol GT
Rakel, Barbara A
Dailey, Dana L
Sluka, Kathleen A
author_sort Vance, Carol GT
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological intervention used to manage pain using skin surface electrodes. Optimal electrode placement is unclear. We hypothesized that better analgesia would occur if electrodes were placed over sites with lower skin impedance. Optimal site selection (OSS) and sham site selection (SSS) electrode sites on the forearm were identified using a standard clinical technique. METHODS: Experiment 1 measured skin impedance in the forearm at OSS and SSS. Experiment 2 was a crossover design double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing OSS-TENS, SSS-TENS, and placebo TENS (P-TENS) to confirm differences in skin impedance between OSS and SSS, and measure change in pressure pain threshold (PPT) following a 30-minute TENS treatment. Healthy volunteers were recruited (ten for Experiment 1 [five male, five female] and 24 for Experiment 2 [12 male, 12 female]). TENS was applied for 30 minutes at 100 Hz frequency, 100 µs pulse duration, and “strong but nonpainful” amplitude. RESULTS: Experiment 1 results demonstrate significantly higher impedance at SSS (17.69±1.24 Ω) compared to OSS (13.53±0.57 Ω) (P=0.007). For Experiment 2, electrode site impedance was significantly higher over SSS, with both the impedance meter (P=0.001) and the TENS unit (P=0.012) compared to OSS. PPT change was significantly greater for both OSS-TENS (P=0.024) and SSS-TENS (P=0.025) when compared to P-TENS. PPT did not differ between the two active TENS treatments (P=0.81). CONCLUSION: Skin impedance is lower at sites characterized as optimal using the described technique of electrode site selection. When TENS is applied at adequate intensities, skin impedance is not a factor in attainment of hypoalgesia of the forearm in healthy subjects. Further investigation should include testing in patients presenting with painful conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4547643
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45476432015-08-27 Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness Vance, Carol GT Rakel, Barbara A Dailey, Dana L Sluka, Kathleen A J Pain Res Original Research OBJECTIVE: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a nonpharmacological intervention used to manage pain using skin surface electrodes. Optimal electrode placement is unclear. We hypothesized that better analgesia would occur if electrodes were placed over sites with lower skin impedance. Optimal site selection (OSS) and sham site selection (SSS) electrode sites on the forearm were identified using a standard clinical technique. METHODS: Experiment 1 measured skin impedance in the forearm at OSS and SSS. Experiment 2 was a crossover design double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing OSS-TENS, SSS-TENS, and placebo TENS (P-TENS) to confirm differences in skin impedance between OSS and SSS, and measure change in pressure pain threshold (PPT) following a 30-minute TENS treatment. Healthy volunteers were recruited (ten for Experiment 1 [five male, five female] and 24 for Experiment 2 [12 male, 12 female]). TENS was applied for 30 minutes at 100 Hz frequency, 100 µs pulse duration, and “strong but nonpainful” amplitude. RESULTS: Experiment 1 results demonstrate significantly higher impedance at SSS (17.69±1.24 Ω) compared to OSS (13.53±0.57 Ω) (P=0.007). For Experiment 2, electrode site impedance was significantly higher over SSS, with both the impedance meter (P=0.001) and the TENS unit (P=0.012) compared to OSS. PPT change was significantly greater for both OSS-TENS (P=0.024) and SSS-TENS (P=0.025) when compared to P-TENS. PPT did not differ between the two active TENS treatments (P=0.81). CONCLUSION: Skin impedance is lower at sites characterized as optimal using the described technique of electrode site selection. When TENS is applied at adequate intensities, skin impedance is not a factor in attainment of hypoalgesia of the forearm in healthy subjects. Further investigation should include testing in patients presenting with painful conditions. Dove Medical Press 2015-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4547643/ /pubmed/26316808 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S86577 Text en © 2015 Vance et al. This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed.
spellingShingle Original Research
Vance, Carol GT
Rakel, Barbara A
Dailey, Dana L
Sluka, Kathleen A
Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
title Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
title_full Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
title_fullStr Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
title_full_unstemmed Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
title_short Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
title_sort skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547643/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26316808
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S86577
work_keys_str_mv AT vancecarolgt skinimpedanceisnotafactorintranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationeffectiveness
AT rakelbarbaraa skinimpedanceisnotafactorintranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationeffectiveness
AT daileydanal skinimpedanceisnotafactorintranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationeffectiveness
AT slukakathleena skinimpedanceisnotafactorintranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationeffectiveness