Cargando…

The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, N., Pison, L., Lozekoot, P., Choudhury, R., La Meir, M., Gelsomino, S., Crijns, H., Maessen, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0729-y
_version_ 1782387123695910912
author Kumar, N.
Pison, L.
Lozekoot, P.
Choudhury, R.
La Meir, M.
Gelsomino, S.
Crijns, H.
Maessen, J.
author_facet Kumar, N.
Pison, L.
Lozekoot, P.
Choudhury, R.
La Meir, M.
Gelsomino, S.
Crijns, H.
Maessen, J.
author_sort Kumar, N.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the ablation tip and cardiac tissue may increase the risk of thrombus formation, catheter tip charring, steam pop formation, and even cardiac perforation. CF monitoring is a significant new parameter for titration of the CF for creating an adequate lesion. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent epicardial ablation using bipolar radiofrequency devices. After checking electrical bidirectional block of the ablation lines, an endocardial CF catheter was used for further ablation (if needed) to complete the isolation of PVs, box lesion, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). RESULTS: Endocardial touch-up was needed for 2 PVs (1.3 %) and 10 (26.3 %) box lesions. It was also used for the CTI line in 7 (18.4 %) patients, atrial tachycardia in 3 (7.9 %) patients, and additional CFAE ablation in 17 (44.7 %) patients. All 5 patients with arrhythmia recurrence had a mean CF < 10 g (p = 0.03). Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the CF group (223 ± 57 vs. 256 ± 60 min, p = 0.03) compared with control group. CONCLUSION: Use of CF catheters is safe, feasible, and complementary to a hybrid procedure setup for atrial fibrillation ablation. Its real-time monitoring may predict future arrhythmia recurrence, and decrease procedure time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4547945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45479452015-08-26 The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation Kumar, N. Pison, L. Lozekoot, P. Choudhury, R. La Meir, M. Gelsomino, S. Crijns, H. Maessen, J. Neth Heart J Original Article OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the ablation tip and cardiac tissue may increase the risk of thrombus formation, catheter tip charring, steam pop formation, and even cardiac perforation. CF monitoring is a significant new parameter for titration of the CF for creating an adequate lesion. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent epicardial ablation using bipolar radiofrequency devices. After checking electrical bidirectional block of the ablation lines, an endocardial CF catheter was used for further ablation (if needed) to complete the isolation of PVs, box lesion, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). RESULTS: Endocardial touch-up was needed for 2 PVs (1.3 %) and 10 (26.3 %) box lesions. It was also used for the CTI line in 7 (18.4 %) patients, atrial tachycardia in 3 (7.9 %) patients, and additional CFAE ablation in 17 (44.7 %) patients. All 5 patients with arrhythmia recurrence had a mean CF < 10 g (p = 0.03). Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the CF group (223 ± 57 vs. 256 ± 60 min, p = 0.03) compared with control group. CONCLUSION: Use of CF catheters is safe, feasible, and complementary to a hybrid procedure setup for atrial fibrillation ablation. Its real-time monitoring may predict future arrhythmia recurrence, and decrease procedure time. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-07-08 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4547945/ /pubmed/26153267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0729-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kumar, N.
Pison, L.
Lozekoot, P.
Choudhury, R.
La Meir, M.
Gelsomino, S.
Crijns, H.
Maessen, J.
The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
title The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
title_full The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
title_fullStr The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
title_full_unstemmed The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
title_short The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
title_sort symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0729-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarn thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT pisonl thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT lozekootp thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT choudhuryr thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT lameirm thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT gelsominos thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT crijnsh thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT maessenj thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT kumarn symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT pisonl symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT lozekootp symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT choudhuryr symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT lameirm symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT gelsominos symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT crijnsh symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation
AT maessenj symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation