Cargando…
The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation
OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bohn Stafleu van Loghum
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0729-y |
_version_ | 1782387123695910912 |
---|---|
author | Kumar, N. Pison, L. Lozekoot, P. Choudhury, R. La Meir, M. Gelsomino, S. Crijns, H. Maessen, J. |
author_facet | Kumar, N. Pison, L. Lozekoot, P. Choudhury, R. La Meir, M. Gelsomino, S. Crijns, H. Maessen, J. |
author_sort | Kumar, N. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the ablation tip and cardiac tissue may increase the risk of thrombus formation, catheter tip charring, steam pop formation, and even cardiac perforation. CF monitoring is a significant new parameter for titration of the CF for creating an adequate lesion. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent epicardial ablation using bipolar radiofrequency devices. After checking electrical bidirectional block of the ablation lines, an endocardial CF catheter was used for further ablation (if needed) to complete the isolation of PVs, box lesion, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). RESULTS: Endocardial touch-up was needed for 2 PVs (1.3 %) and 10 (26.3 %) box lesions. It was also used for the CTI line in 7 (18.4 %) patients, atrial tachycardia in 3 (7.9 %) patients, and additional CFAE ablation in 17 (44.7 %) patients. All 5 patients with arrhythmia recurrence had a mean CF < 10 g (p = 0.03). Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the CF group (223 ± 57 vs. 256 ± 60 min, p = 0.03) compared with control group. CONCLUSION: Use of CF catheters is safe, feasible, and complementary to a hybrid procedure setup for atrial fibrillation ablation. Its real-time monitoring may predict future arrhythmia recurrence, and decrease procedure time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4547945 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Bohn Stafleu van Loghum |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45479452015-08-26 The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation Kumar, N. Pison, L. Lozekoot, P. Choudhury, R. La Meir, M. Gelsomino, S. Crijns, H. Maessen, J. Neth Heart J Original Article OBJECTIVE: Reconduction across an ablation line is a common reason for arrhythmia recurrence over time. The hybrid procedure combines epicardial ablation of the pulmonary vein (PV) and creation of a box lesion with endocardial touch-ups for any electrical gaps. A high contact force (CF) between the ablation tip and cardiac tissue may increase the risk of thrombus formation, catheter tip charring, steam pop formation, and even cardiac perforation. CF monitoring is a significant new parameter for titration of the CF for creating an adequate lesion. METHODS: Thirty-eight consecutive patients underwent epicardial ablation using bipolar radiofrequency devices. After checking electrical bidirectional block of the ablation lines, an endocardial CF catheter was used for further ablation (if needed) to complete the isolation of PVs, box lesion, cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI), and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE). RESULTS: Endocardial touch-up was needed for 2 PVs (1.3 %) and 10 (26.3 %) box lesions. It was also used for the CTI line in 7 (18.4 %) patients, atrial tachycardia in 3 (7.9 %) patients, and additional CFAE ablation in 17 (44.7 %) patients. All 5 patients with arrhythmia recurrence had a mean CF < 10 g (p = 0.03). Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the CF group (223 ± 57 vs. 256 ± 60 min, p = 0.03) compared with control group. CONCLUSION: Use of CF catheters is safe, feasible, and complementary to a hybrid procedure setup for atrial fibrillation ablation. Its real-time monitoring may predict future arrhythmia recurrence, and decrease procedure time. Bohn Stafleu van Loghum 2015-07-08 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4547945/ /pubmed/26153267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0729-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Kumar, N. Pison, L. Lozekoot, P. Choudhury, R. La Meir, M. Gelsomino, S. Crijns, H. Maessen, J. The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
title | The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
title_full | The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
title_fullStr | The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
title_full_unstemmed | The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
title_short | The symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
title_sort | symbiosis of contact force catheter use for hybrid ablation for atrial fibrillation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4547945/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26153267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0729-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kumarn thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT pisonl thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT lozekootp thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT choudhuryr thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT lameirm thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT gelsominos thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT crijnsh thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT maessenj thesymbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT kumarn symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT pisonl symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT lozekootp symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT choudhuryr symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT lameirm symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT gelsominos symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT crijnsh symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation AT maessenj symbiosisofcontactforcecatheteruseforhybridablationforatrialfibrillation |