Cargando…

Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 y...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kusiak, Aleksander, Wiliński, Jerzy, Wojciechowska, Wiktoria, Jastrzębski, Marek, Sondej, Tomasz, Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata, Czarnecka, Danuta M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322084
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.53292
_version_ 1782387138901311488
author Kusiak, Aleksander
Wiliński, Jerzy
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Jastrzębski, Marek
Sondej, Tomasz
Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata
Czarnecka, Danuta M.
author_facet Kusiak, Aleksander
Wiliński, Jerzy
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Jastrzębski, Marek
Sondej, Tomasz
Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata
Czarnecka, Danuta M.
author_sort Kusiak, Aleksander
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having a CRT device implanted were collected. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and QRS complex duration ≥ 120 ms. Echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging techniques and complex RV evaluation were performed at baseline and three months after CRT onset. RESULTS: Three months after CRT implantation, patients responding to CRT, defined as a reduction of left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% (n = 34), compared to patients with a reduction of LVESV of less than 10% (n = 23), had at baseline a smaller right atrium diameter (47.85 ±11.33 mm vs. 52.65 ±8.69 mm; p = 0.028), higher TAPSE (14.56 ±2.57 mm vs. 13.04 ±2.93 mm; p = 0.030) and lower grade of tricuspid valve regurgitation (1.82 ±0.97 vs. 2.3 ±0.88; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there are differences in baseline right ventricular function between responders and non-responders to CRT. Yet in our study, none of the baseline RV parameters provided any value in identifying patients who would respond to CRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4548031
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45480312015-08-28 Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy Kusiak, Aleksander Wiliński, Jerzy Wojciechowska, Wiktoria Jastrzębski, Marek Sondej, Tomasz Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata Czarnecka, Danuta M. Arch Med Sci Clinical Research INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether baseline right ventricular (RV) function assessed by standard echocardiography may indicate patients who will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data of 57 patients (54 men, 95%), aged 66.4 ±8.7 years with heart failure (HF) having a CRT device implanted were collected. All patients had left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and QRS complex duration ≥ 120 ms. Echocardiographic examination with tissue Doppler imaging techniques and complex RV evaluation were performed at baseline and three months after CRT onset. RESULTS: Three months after CRT implantation, patients responding to CRT, defined as a reduction of left ventricle end-systolic volume (LVESV) of at least 10% (n = 34), compared to patients with a reduction of LVESV of less than 10% (n = 23), had at baseline a smaller right atrium diameter (47.85 ±11.33 mm vs. 52.65 ±8.69 mm; p = 0.028), higher TAPSE (14.56 ±2.57 mm vs. 13.04 ±2.93 mm; p = 0.030) and lower grade of tricuspid valve regurgitation (1.82 ±0.97 vs. 2.3 ±0.88; p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there are differences in baseline right ventricular function between responders and non-responders to CRT. Yet in our study, none of the baseline RV parameters provided any value in identifying patients who would respond to CRT. Termedia Publishing House 2015-08-11 2015-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4548031/ /pubmed/26322084 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.53292 Text en Copyright © 2015 Termedia & Banach http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License, permitting all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Research
Kusiak, Aleksander
Wiliński, Jerzy
Wojciechowska, Wiktoria
Jastrzębski, Marek
Sondej, Tomasz
Kloch-Badełek, Małgorzata
Czarnecka, Danuta M.
Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_fullStr Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_full_unstemmed Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_short Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
title_sort echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function in responders and non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy
topic Clinical Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548031/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26322084
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2015.53292
work_keys_str_mv AT kusiakaleksander echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT wilinskijerzy echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT wojciechowskawiktoria echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT jastrzebskimarek echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT sondejtomasz echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT klochbadełekmałgorzata echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy
AT czarneckadanutam echocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularfunctioninrespondersandnonresponderstocardiacresynchronizationtherapy