Cargando…

Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils

Pakistan is among top three chickpea producing countries but the crop is usually grown on marginal lands without irrigation and fertilizer application which significantly hampers its yield. Soil fertility and inoculation with beneficial rhizobacteria play a key role in nodulation and yield of legume...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Imran, Asma, Mirza, Muhammad S., Shah, Tariq M., Malik, Kauser A., Hafeez, Fauzia Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00859
_version_ 1782387175961133056
author Imran, Asma
Mirza, Muhammad S.
Shah, Tariq M.
Malik, Kauser A.
Hafeez, Fauzia Y.
author_facet Imran, Asma
Mirza, Muhammad S.
Shah, Tariq M.
Malik, Kauser A.
Hafeez, Fauzia Y.
author_sort Imran, Asma
collection PubMed
description Pakistan is among top three chickpea producing countries but the crop is usually grown on marginal lands without irrigation and fertilizer application which significantly hampers its yield. Soil fertility and inoculation with beneficial rhizobacteria play a key role in nodulation and yield of legumes. Four kabuli and six desi chickpea genotypes were, therefore, evaluated for inoculation response with IAA-producing Ochrobactrum ciceri Ca-34(T) and nitrogen fixing Mesorhizobium ciceri TAL-1148 in single and co-inoculation in two soils. The soil type 1 was previously unplanted marginal soil having low organic matter, P and N contents compared to soil type 2 which was a fertile routinely legume-cultivated soil. The effect of soil fertility status was pronounced and fertile soil on average, produced 31% more nodules, 62% more biomass and 111% grain yield than marginal soil. Inoculation either with O. ciceri alone or its co-inoculation with M. ciceri produced on average higher nodules (42%), biomass (31%), grains yield (64%) and harvest index (72%) in both chickpea genotypes over non-inoculated controls in both soils. Soil 1 showed maximum relative effectiveness of Ca-34(T) inoculation for kabuli genotypes while soil 2 showed for desi genotypes except B8/02. Desi genotype B8/02 in soil type 1 and Pb-2008 in soil type 2 showed significant yield increase as compared to respective un-inoculated controls. Across bacterial inoculation treatments, grain yield was positively correlated to growth and yield contributing parameters (r = 0.294(*) to 0.838(***) for desi and r = 0.388(*) to 0.857(**) for kabuli). PCA and CAT-PCA analyses clearly showed a site-specific response of genotype x bacterial inoculation. Furthermore, the inoculated bacterial strains were able to persist in the rhizosphere showing colonization on root and within nodules. Present study shows that plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation should be integrated with national chickpea breading program in Pakistan especially for marginal soils. Furthermore, the study shows the potential of phytohormone producing strain Ca-34(T) as promising candidate for development of biofertilizer alongwith nodulating strains to get sustainable yield of kabuli and desi chickpea with minimum inputs at marginal land.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4548240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45482402015-09-14 Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils Imran, Asma Mirza, Muhammad S. Shah, Tariq M. Malik, Kauser A. Hafeez, Fauzia Y. Front Microbiol Plant Science Pakistan is among top three chickpea producing countries but the crop is usually grown on marginal lands without irrigation and fertilizer application which significantly hampers its yield. Soil fertility and inoculation with beneficial rhizobacteria play a key role in nodulation and yield of legumes. Four kabuli and six desi chickpea genotypes were, therefore, evaluated for inoculation response with IAA-producing Ochrobactrum ciceri Ca-34(T) and nitrogen fixing Mesorhizobium ciceri TAL-1148 in single and co-inoculation in two soils. The soil type 1 was previously unplanted marginal soil having low organic matter, P and N contents compared to soil type 2 which was a fertile routinely legume-cultivated soil. The effect of soil fertility status was pronounced and fertile soil on average, produced 31% more nodules, 62% more biomass and 111% grain yield than marginal soil. Inoculation either with O. ciceri alone or its co-inoculation with M. ciceri produced on average higher nodules (42%), biomass (31%), grains yield (64%) and harvest index (72%) in both chickpea genotypes over non-inoculated controls in both soils. Soil 1 showed maximum relative effectiveness of Ca-34(T) inoculation for kabuli genotypes while soil 2 showed for desi genotypes except B8/02. Desi genotype B8/02 in soil type 1 and Pb-2008 in soil type 2 showed significant yield increase as compared to respective un-inoculated controls. Across bacterial inoculation treatments, grain yield was positively correlated to growth and yield contributing parameters (r = 0.294(*) to 0.838(***) for desi and r = 0.388(*) to 0.857(**) for kabuli). PCA and CAT-PCA analyses clearly showed a site-specific response of genotype x bacterial inoculation. Furthermore, the inoculated bacterial strains were able to persist in the rhizosphere showing colonization on root and within nodules. Present study shows that plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) inoculation should be integrated with national chickpea breading program in Pakistan especially for marginal soils. Furthermore, the study shows the potential of phytohormone producing strain Ca-34(T) as promising candidate for development of biofertilizer alongwith nodulating strains to get sustainable yield of kabuli and desi chickpea with minimum inputs at marginal land. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4548240/ /pubmed/26379638 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00859 Text en Copyright © 2015 Imran, Mirza, Shah, Malik and Hafeez. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Imran, Asma
Mirza, Muhammad S.
Shah, Tariq M.
Malik, Kauser A.
Hafeez, Fauzia Y.
Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils
title Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils
title_full Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils
title_fullStr Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils
title_full_unstemmed Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils
title_short Differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with PGPR in different soils
title_sort differential response of kabuli and desi chickpea genotypes toward inoculation with pgpr in different soils
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379638
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00859
work_keys_str_mv AT imranasma differentialresponseofkabulianddesichickpeagenotypestowardinoculationwithpgprindifferentsoils
AT mirzamuhammads differentialresponseofkabulianddesichickpeagenotypestowardinoculationwithpgprindifferentsoils
AT shahtariqm differentialresponseofkabulianddesichickpeagenotypestowardinoculationwithpgprindifferentsoils
AT malikkausera differentialresponseofkabulianddesichickpeagenotypestowardinoculationwithpgprindifferentsoils
AT hafeezfauziay differentialresponseofkabulianddesichickpeagenotypestowardinoculationwithpgprindifferentsoils