Cargando…
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
Few biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of internal stabilization techniques after decompressive surgery on the stability of the canine lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this canine cadaver study is to evaluate the stability of the canine lumbosacral (LS) spine in flexion and extensio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312169 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1094 |
_version_ | 1782387206045827072 |
---|---|
author | Early, Peter Mente, Peter Dillard, Stacy Roe, Simon |
author_facet | Early, Peter Mente, Peter Dillard, Stacy Roe, Simon |
author_sort | Early, Peter |
collection | PubMed |
description | Few biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of internal stabilization techniques after decompressive surgery on the stability of the canine lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this canine cadaver study is to evaluate the stability of the canine lumbosacral (LS) spine in flexion and extension following laminectomy and discectomy and then stabilization with each of the three techniques: pins and polymethylmethacrylate (P/PMMA), two dorsal locking plates (SOP) or bilateral transarticular facet screws (FACET).Using a cantilever biomechanical system, bending moments were applied to the LS and range of motion (ROM) was recorded via a rotational potentiometer. With 3 Nm, the ROM (n = 4 in each group) for P/PMMA, SOP and FACET were 1.92 ± 0.96°, 2.56 ± 0.55°and 3.18 ± 1.14°, respectively. With moments up to 35 Nm, the P/PMMA specimens appeared stable. Sacroiliac motion in the SOP and FACET groups invalidated further comparisons. Each of the stabilization techniques (P/PMMA, SOP, and FACET) significantly decreased the range of motion in flexion and extension for low bending moments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4548529 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45485292015-08-26 In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction Early, Peter Mente, Peter Dillard, Stacy Roe, Simon PeerJ Veterinary Medicine Few biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of internal stabilization techniques after decompressive surgery on the stability of the canine lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this canine cadaver study is to evaluate the stability of the canine lumbosacral (LS) spine in flexion and extension following laminectomy and discectomy and then stabilization with each of the three techniques: pins and polymethylmethacrylate (P/PMMA), two dorsal locking plates (SOP) or bilateral transarticular facet screws (FACET).Using a cantilever biomechanical system, bending moments were applied to the LS and range of motion (ROM) was recorded via a rotational potentiometer. With 3 Nm, the ROM (n = 4 in each group) for P/PMMA, SOP and FACET were 1.92 ± 0.96°, 2.56 ± 0.55°and 3.18 ± 1.14°, respectively. With moments up to 35 Nm, the P/PMMA specimens appeared stable. Sacroiliac motion in the SOP and FACET groups invalidated further comparisons. Each of the stabilization techniques (P/PMMA, SOP, and FACET) significantly decreased the range of motion in flexion and extension for low bending moments. PeerJ Inc. 2015-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4548529/ /pubmed/26312169 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1094 Text en © 2015 Early et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Veterinary Medicine Early, Peter Mente, Peter Dillard, Stacy Roe, Simon In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
title | In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
title_full | In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
title_fullStr | In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
title_full_unstemmed | In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
title_short | In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
title_sort | in vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction |
topic | Veterinary Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548529/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312169 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1094 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT earlypeter invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction AT mentepeter invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction AT dillardstacy invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction AT roesimon invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction |