Cargando…

In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction

Few biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of internal stabilization techniques after decompressive surgery on the stability of the canine lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this canine cadaver study is to evaluate the stability of the canine lumbosacral (LS) spine in flexion and extensio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Early, Peter, Mente, Peter, Dillard, Stacy, Roe, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312169
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1094
_version_ 1782387206045827072
author Early, Peter
Mente, Peter
Dillard, Stacy
Roe, Simon
author_facet Early, Peter
Mente, Peter
Dillard, Stacy
Roe, Simon
author_sort Early, Peter
collection PubMed
description Few biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of internal stabilization techniques after decompressive surgery on the stability of the canine lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this canine cadaver study is to evaluate the stability of the canine lumbosacral (LS) spine in flexion and extension following laminectomy and discectomy and then stabilization with each of the three techniques: pins and polymethylmethacrylate (P/PMMA), two dorsal locking plates (SOP) or bilateral transarticular facet screws (FACET).Using a cantilever biomechanical system, bending moments were applied to the LS and range of motion (ROM) was recorded via a rotational potentiometer. With 3 Nm, the ROM (n = 4 in each group) for P/PMMA, SOP and FACET were 1.92 ± 0.96°, 2.56 ± 0.55°and 3.18 ± 1.14°, respectively. With moments up to 35 Nm, the P/PMMA specimens appeared stable. Sacroiliac motion in the SOP and FACET groups invalidated further comparisons. Each of the stabilization techniques (P/PMMA, SOP, and FACET) significantly decreased the range of motion in flexion and extension for low bending moments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4548529
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45485292015-08-26 In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction Early, Peter Mente, Peter Dillard, Stacy Roe, Simon PeerJ Veterinary Medicine Few biomechanical studies have evaluated the effect of internal stabilization techniques after decompressive surgery on the stability of the canine lumbosacral junction. The purpose of this canine cadaver study is to evaluate the stability of the canine lumbosacral (LS) spine in flexion and extension following laminectomy and discectomy and then stabilization with each of the three techniques: pins and polymethylmethacrylate (P/PMMA), two dorsal locking plates (SOP) or bilateral transarticular facet screws (FACET).Using a cantilever biomechanical system, bending moments were applied to the LS and range of motion (ROM) was recorded via a rotational potentiometer. With 3 Nm, the ROM (n = 4 in each group) for P/PMMA, SOP and FACET were 1.92 ± 0.96°, 2.56 ± 0.55°and 3.18 ± 1.14°, respectively. With moments up to 35 Nm, the P/PMMA specimens appeared stable. Sacroiliac motion in the SOP and FACET groups invalidated further comparisons. Each of the stabilization techniques (P/PMMA, SOP, and FACET) significantly decreased the range of motion in flexion and extension for low bending moments. PeerJ Inc. 2015-08-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4548529/ /pubmed/26312169 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1094 Text en © 2015 Early et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Veterinary Medicine
Early, Peter
Mente, Peter
Dillard, Stacy
Roe, Simon
In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
title In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
title_full In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
title_fullStr In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
title_full_unstemmed In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
title_short In vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
title_sort in vitro biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation techniques on the canine lumbosacral junction
topic Veterinary Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548529/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26312169
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.1094
work_keys_str_mv AT earlypeter invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction
AT mentepeter invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction
AT dillardstacy invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction
AT roesimon invitrobiomechanicalevaluationofinternalfixationtechniquesonthecaninelumbosacraljunction