Cargando…
Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine
BACKGROUND: Failure of passive transfer of maternal immunity via colostrum can occur in the bovine, and a number of blood tests have been developed to test calves for this failure. It is not clear which test is most suitable for this purpose. The objective was to examine the most commonly used tests...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-015-0047-0 |
_version_ | 1782387216116350976 |
---|---|
author | Hogan, Ian Doherty, Michael Fagan, John Kennedy, Emer Conneely, Muireann Brady, Paula Ryan, Clare Lorenz, Ingrid |
author_facet | Hogan, Ian Doherty, Michael Fagan, John Kennedy, Emer Conneely, Muireann Brady, Paula Ryan, Clare Lorenz, Ingrid |
author_sort | Hogan, Ian |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Failure of passive transfer of maternal immunity via colostrum can occur in the bovine, and a number of blood tests have been developed to test calves for this failure. It is not clear which test is most suitable for this purpose. The objective was to examine the most commonly used tests for failure of passive transfer and to decide which is most suitable for routine laboratory use. 126 serum samples were taken from calves of dairy cows after birth but prior to colostrum feeding, and at 48 h of age. Five different tests were compared against radial immunodiffusion which is considered the appropriate reference method. These tests were serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, serum protein levels, serum globulin levels, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and the zinc sulphate turbidity test. RESULTS: The tests examined displayed high sensitivity but widely varying specificity. Examination of the use of different cut-off points allowed some improvement in specificity at the expense of sensitivity, but the tests which had performed best at the original cut-off points still displayed the best performance. Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels as a measure of colostrum absorption returned, in this study, the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The ELISA used in this study and serum globulin levels displayed performance similar to the gamma-glutamyltransferase levels. Serum total protein was less successful than others examined at providing both sensitivity and specificity but may, when performed via refractometer, be useful for on-farm testing. As currently performed the poor sensitivity for which the zinc sulphate turbidity test is most often criticized is evident. Modification of the cut-off point to increase specificity is less successful at balancing these parameters than the ELISA, gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, and globulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, ELISA testing and circulating globulin levels performed best in detecting failure of passive transfer in serum samples, although all three had some practical considerations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4548692 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45486922015-08-26 Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine Hogan, Ian Doherty, Michael Fagan, John Kennedy, Emer Conneely, Muireann Brady, Paula Ryan, Clare Lorenz, Ingrid Ir Vet J Research BACKGROUND: Failure of passive transfer of maternal immunity via colostrum can occur in the bovine, and a number of blood tests have been developed to test calves for this failure. It is not clear which test is most suitable for this purpose. The objective was to examine the most commonly used tests for failure of passive transfer and to decide which is most suitable for routine laboratory use. 126 serum samples were taken from calves of dairy cows after birth but prior to colostrum feeding, and at 48 h of age. Five different tests were compared against radial immunodiffusion which is considered the appropriate reference method. These tests were serum gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, serum protein levels, serum globulin levels, an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and the zinc sulphate turbidity test. RESULTS: The tests examined displayed high sensitivity but widely varying specificity. Examination of the use of different cut-off points allowed some improvement in specificity at the expense of sensitivity, but the tests which had performed best at the original cut-off points still displayed the best performance. Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels as a measure of colostrum absorption returned, in this study, the best balance between sensitivity and specificity. The ELISA used in this study and serum globulin levels displayed performance similar to the gamma-glutamyltransferase levels. Serum total protein was less successful than others examined at providing both sensitivity and specificity but may, when performed via refractometer, be useful for on-farm testing. As currently performed the poor sensitivity for which the zinc sulphate turbidity test is most often criticized is evident. Modification of the cut-off point to increase specificity is less successful at balancing these parameters than the ELISA, gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, and globulin levels. CONCLUSIONS: Gamma-glutamyltransferase levels, ELISA testing and circulating globulin levels performed best in detecting failure of passive transfer in serum samples, although all three had some practical considerations. BioMed Central 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4548692/ /pubmed/26309724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-015-0047-0 Text en © Hogan et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Hogan, Ian Doherty, Michael Fagan, John Kennedy, Emer Conneely, Muireann Brady, Paula Ryan, Clare Lorenz, Ingrid Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
title | Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
title_full | Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
title_fullStr | Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
title_short | Comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
title_sort | comparison of rapid laboratory tests for failure of passive transfer in the bovine |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4548692/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309724 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13620-015-0047-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoganian comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT dohertymichael comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT faganjohn comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT kennedyemer comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT conneelymuireann comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT bradypaula comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT ryanclare comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine AT lorenzingrid comparisonofrapidlaboratorytestsforfailureofpassivetransferinthebovine |