Cargando…

The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND: Personality disordered offenders (PDOs) are generally considered difficult to manage and to have a negative impact on staff working with them. AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview of studies examining the impact on staff of working with PDOs, identify impact areas associated wit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freestone, Mark C., Wilson, Kim, Jones, Rose, Mikton, Chris, Milsom, Sophia, Sonigra, Ketan, Taylor, Celia, Campbell, Colin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26305891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136378
_version_ 1782387288489066496
author Freestone, Mark C.
Wilson, Kim
Jones, Rose
Mikton, Chris
Milsom, Sophia
Sonigra, Ketan
Taylor, Celia
Campbell, Colin
author_facet Freestone, Mark C.
Wilson, Kim
Jones, Rose
Mikton, Chris
Milsom, Sophia
Sonigra, Ketan
Taylor, Celia
Campbell, Colin
author_sort Freestone, Mark C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Personality disordered offenders (PDOs) are generally considered difficult to manage and to have a negative impact on staff working with them. AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview of studies examining the impact on staff of working with PDOs, identify impact areas associated with working with PDOs, identify gaps in existing research,and direct future research efforts. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the English-language literature from 1964–2014 across 20 databases in the medical and social sciences. RESULTS: 27 papers were included in the review. Studies identified negative impacts upon staff including: negative attitudes, burnout, stress, negative counter-transferential experiences; two studies found positive impacts of job excitement and satisfaction, and the evidence related to perceived risk of violence from PDOs was equivocal. Studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity and meta-analysis was not possible. The overall level of identified evidence was low: 23 studies (85%) were descriptive only, and only one adequately powered cohort study was found. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified a significant amount of descriptive literature, but only one cohort study and no trials or previous systematic reviews of literatures. Clinicians and managers working with PDOs should be aware of the potential impacts identified, but there is an urgent need for further research focusing on the robust evaluation of interventions to minimise harm to staff working with offenders who suffer from personality disorder.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4549262
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45492622015-09-01 The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review Freestone, Mark C. Wilson, Kim Jones, Rose Mikton, Chris Milsom, Sophia Sonigra, Ketan Taylor, Celia Campbell, Colin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Personality disordered offenders (PDOs) are generally considered difficult to manage and to have a negative impact on staff working with them. AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview of studies examining the impact on staff of working with PDOs, identify impact areas associated with working with PDOs, identify gaps in existing research,and direct future research efforts. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the English-language literature from 1964–2014 across 20 databases in the medical and social sciences. RESULTS: 27 papers were included in the review. Studies identified negative impacts upon staff including: negative attitudes, burnout, stress, negative counter-transferential experiences; two studies found positive impacts of job excitement and satisfaction, and the evidence related to perceived risk of violence from PDOs was equivocal. Studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity and meta-analysis was not possible. The overall level of identified evidence was low: 23 studies (85%) were descriptive only, and only one adequately powered cohort study was found. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified a significant amount of descriptive literature, but only one cohort study and no trials or previous systematic reviews of literatures. Clinicians and managers working with PDOs should be aware of the potential impacts identified, but there is an urgent need for further research focusing on the robust evaluation of interventions to minimise harm to staff working with offenders who suffer from personality disorder. Public Library of Science 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4549262/ /pubmed/26305891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136378 Text en © 2015 Freestone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Freestone, Mark C.
Wilson, Kim
Jones, Rose
Mikton, Chris
Milsom, Sophia
Sonigra, Ketan
Taylor, Celia
Campbell, Colin
The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
title The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
title_full The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
title_short The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
title_sort impact on staff of working with personality disordered offenders: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549262/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26305891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136378
work_keys_str_mv AT freestonemarkc theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT wilsonkim theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT jonesrose theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT miktonchris theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT milsomsophia theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT sonigraketan theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT taylorcelia theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT campbellcolin theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT freestonemarkc impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT wilsonkim impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT jonesrose impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT miktonchris impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT milsomsophia impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT sonigraketan impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT taylorcelia impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview
AT campbellcolin impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview