Cargando…
The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: Personality disordered offenders (PDOs) are generally considered difficult to manage and to have a negative impact on staff working with them. AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview of studies examining the impact on staff of working with PDOs, identify impact areas associated wit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26305891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136378 |
_version_ | 1782387288489066496 |
---|---|
author | Freestone, Mark C. Wilson, Kim Jones, Rose Mikton, Chris Milsom, Sophia Sonigra, Ketan Taylor, Celia Campbell, Colin |
author_facet | Freestone, Mark C. Wilson, Kim Jones, Rose Mikton, Chris Milsom, Sophia Sonigra, Ketan Taylor, Celia Campbell, Colin |
author_sort | Freestone, Mark C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Personality disordered offenders (PDOs) are generally considered difficult to manage and to have a negative impact on staff working with them. AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview of studies examining the impact on staff of working with PDOs, identify impact areas associated with working with PDOs, identify gaps in existing research,and direct future research efforts. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the English-language literature from 1964–2014 across 20 databases in the medical and social sciences. RESULTS: 27 papers were included in the review. Studies identified negative impacts upon staff including: negative attitudes, burnout, stress, negative counter-transferential experiences; two studies found positive impacts of job excitement and satisfaction, and the evidence related to perceived risk of violence from PDOs was equivocal. Studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity and meta-analysis was not possible. The overall level of identified evidence was low: 23 studies (85%) were descriptive only, and only one adequately powered cohort study was found. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified a significant amount of descriptive literature, but only one cohort study and no trials or previous systematic reviews of literatures. Clinicians and managers working with PDOs should be aware of the potential impacts identified, but there is an urgent need for further research focusing on the robust evaluation of interventions to minimise harm to staff working with offenders who suffer from personality disorder. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4549262 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45492622015-09-01 The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review Freestone, Mark C. Wilson, Kim Jones, Rose Mikton, Chris Milsom, Sophia Sonigra, Ketan Taylor, Celia Campbell, Colin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Personality disordered offenders (PDOs) are generally considered difficult to manage and to have a negative impact on staff working with them. AIMS: This study aimed to provide an overview of studies examining the impact on staff of working with PDOs, identify impact areas associated with working with PDOs, identify gaps in existing research,and direct future research efforts. METHODS: The authors conducted a systematic review of the English-language literature from 1964–2014 across 20 databases in the medical and social sciences. RESULTS: 27 papers were included in the review. Studies identified negative impacts upon staff including: negative attitudes, burnout, stress, negative counter-transferential experiences; two studies found positive impacts of job excitement and satisfaction, and the evidence related to perceived risk of violence from PDOs was equivocal. Studies demonstrated considerable heterogeneity and meta-analysis was not possible. The overall level of identified evidence was low: 23 studies (85%) were descriptive only, and only one adequately powered cohort study was found. CONCLUSIONS: The review identified a significant amount of descriptive literature, but only one cohort study and no trials or previous systematic reviews of literatures. Clinicians and managers working with PDOs should be aware of the potential impacts identified, but there is an urgent need for further research focusing on the robust evaluation of interventions to minimise harm to staff working with offenders who suffer from personality disorder. Public Library of Science 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4549262/ /pubmed/26305891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136378 Text en © 2015 Freestone et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Freestone, Mark C. Wilson, Kim Jones, Rose Mikton, Chris Milsom, Sophia Sonigra, Ketan Taylor, Celia Campbell, Colin The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review |
title | The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Impact on Staff of Working with Personality Disordered Offenders: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | impact on staff of working with personality disordered offenders: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549262/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26305891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136378 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT freestonemarkc theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT wilsonkim theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT jonesrose theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT miktonchris theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT milsomsophia theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT sonigraketan theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT taylorcelia theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT campbellcolin theimpactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT freestonemarkc impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT wilsonkim impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT jonesrose impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT miktonchris impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT milsomsophia impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT sonigraketan impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT taylorcelia impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview AT campbellcolin impactonstaffofworkingwithpersonalitydisorderedoffendersasystematicreview |