Cargando…
Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration
OBJECTIVES: To compare the influence of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment degeneration. METHODS: The study was carried out in the Traumatology and Orthopedics Laboratory, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Saudi Medical Journal
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26219453 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.8.11759 |
_version_ | 1782387333490802688 |
---|---|
author | Tang, Shujie |
author_facet | Tang, Shujie |
author_sort | Tang, Shujie |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare the influence of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment degeneration. METHODS: The study was carried out in the Traumatology and Orthopedics Laboratory, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, between December 2013 and November 2014. A normal, healthy finite element model of L3-5 was developed, a PLIF and a TLIF model were modified from the normal model, and interbody fusions were performed in the L4-5 segment. An 800 N compressive loading plus 10 Nm moments simulating flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were imposed on the L3 superior endplate. Intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation in L3-4 were investigated. RESULTS: The values of intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation in the PLIF or TLIF model were higher than those in the normal, healthy model, but the values in the TLIF model were relatively lower than those in the PLIF model in all directions. CONCLUSION: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion has more adverse influence on the superior adjacent segment than TLIF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4549599 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Saudi Medical Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45495992015-08-31 Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration Tang, Shujie Saudi Med J Brief Communication OBJECTIVES: To compare the influence of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) on adjacent segment degeneration. METHODS: The study was carried out in the Traumatology and Orthopedics Laboratory, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Medical School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China, between December 2013 and November 2014. A normal, healthy finite element model of L3-5 was developed, a PLIF and a TLIF model were modified from the normal model, and interbody fusions were performed in the L4-5 segment. An 800 N compressive loading plus 10 Nm moments simulating flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were imposed on the L3 superior endplate. Intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation in L3-4 were investigated. RESULTS: The values of intradiscal pressure and intersegmental rotation in the PLIF or TLIF model were higher than those in the normal, healthy model, but the values in the TLIF model were relatively lower than those in the PLIF model in all directions. CONCLUSION: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion has more adverse influence on the superior adjacent segment than TLIF. Saudi Medical Journal 2015-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4549599/ /pubmed/26219453 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.8.11759 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Tang, Shujie Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
title | Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
title_full | Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
title_fullStr | Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
title_short | Comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: Influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
title_sort | comparison of posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using finite element analysis: influence on adjacent segmental degeneration |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549599/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26219453 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.8.11759 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tangshujie comparisonofposteriorversustransforaminallumbarinterbodyfusionusingfiniteelementanalysisinfluenceonadjacentsegmentaldegeneration |