Cargando…

Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy

BACKGROUND: Currently, the most promising therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are exon skipping and stop codon read-through, two strategies aimed at restoring the expression of dystrophin. A phase 3 clinical trial with drisapersen, a drug designed to induce exon 51-skipping, has failed t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merlini, Luciano, Sabatelli, Patrizia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0408-z
_version_ 1782387367645020160
author Merlini, Luciano
Sabatelli, Patrizia
author_facet Merlini, Luciano
Sabatelli, Patrizia
author_sort Merlini, Luciano
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, the most promising therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are exon skipping and stop codon read-through, two strategies aimed at restoring the expression of dystrophin. A phase 3 clinical trial with drisapersen, a drug designed to induce exon 51-skipping, has failed to show significant improvement of the primary outcome measure, the six-minute walk test. DISCUSSION: Here, we review some key points that should be considered when designing clinical trials for these new therapies. First, younger patients have more functional abilities and more muscle fibers to preserve than older patients and therefore are better subjects for trials designed to demonstrate the success of new treatments. Second, the inclusion of patients on corticosteroids both in the treatment and placebo groups is of concern because the positive effect of corticosteroids might mask the effect of the treatment being tested. Additionally, the reasonable expectation from these therapies is the slowing of disease progression rather than improvement. Therefore, the appropriate clinical endpoints are the prolongation of the ability to stand from the floor, climb stairs, and walk, not an increase in muscle strength or function. Hence, the time frames for the detection of new dystrophin, which occurs within months, and the ability to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression, which requires years, are strikingly different. Finally, placebo-controlled trials are difficult to manage if years of blindness are required to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression. Thus, accelerated/conditional approval for new therapies should be based on surrogate biochemical outcomes: the demonstration of de novo dystrophin production and of its beneficial effect on the functional recovery of muscle fiber. SUMMARY: These data suggest that clinical trials for DMD patients must be adapted to the particular characteristics of the disease in order to demonstrate the expected positive effect of new treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4549867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45498672015-08-27 Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy Merlini, Luciano Sabatelli, Patrizia BMC Neurol Debate BACKGROUND: Currently, the most promising therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) are exon skipping and stop codon read-through, two strategies aimed at restoring the expression of dystrophin. A phase 3 clinical trial with drisapersen, a drug designed to induce exon 51-skipping, has failed to show significant improvement of the primary outcome measure, the six-minute walk test. DISCUSSION: Here, we review some key points that should be considered when designing clinical trials for these new therapies. First, younger patients have more functional abilities and more muscle fibers to preserve than older patients and therefore are better subjects for trials designed to demonstrate the success of new treatments. Second, the inclusion of patients on corticosteroids both in the treatment and placebo groups is of concern because the positive effect of corticosteroids might mask the effect of the treatment being tested. Additionally, the reasonable expectation from these therapies is the slowing of disease progression rather than improvement. Therefore, the appropriate clinical endpoints are the prolongation of the ability to stand from the floor, climb stairs, and walk, not an increase in muscle strength or function. Hence, the time frames for the detection of new dystrophin, which occurs within months, and the ability to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression, which requires years, are strikingly different. Finally, placebo-controlled trials are difficult to manage if years of blindness are required to demonstrate a slowing of disease progression. Thus, accelerated/conditional approval for new therapies should be based on surrogate biochemical outcomes: the demonstration of de novo dystrophin production and of its beneficial effect on the functional recovery of muscle fiber. SUMMARY: These data suggest that clinical trials for DMD patients must be adapted to the particular characteristics of the disease in order to demonstrate the expected positive effect of new treatments. BioMed Central 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4549867/ /pubmed/26306629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0408-z Text en © Merlini and Sabatelli. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Merlini, Luciano
Sabatelli, Patrizia
Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
title Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
title_full Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
title_fullStr Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
title_full_unstemmed Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
title_short Improving clinical trial design for Duchenne muscular dystrophy
title_sort improving clinical trial design for duchenne muscular dystrophy
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4549867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26306629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-015-0408-z
work_keys_str_mv AT merliniluciano improvingclinicaltrialdesignforduchennemusculardystrophy
AT sabatellipatrizia improvingclinicaltrialdesignforduchennemusculardystrophy