Cargando…

Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report

BACKGROUND: To report a case of late closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) after vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old lady with a stage IV FTMH underwent pars plana vitrectomy with 25 gauge plus transconjunctival...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Chung-yee, Wong, David Sai-hung, Li, Kenneth Kai-wang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0104-1
_version_ 1782387404490932224
author Chung, Chung-yee
Wong, David Sai-hung
Li, Kenneth Kai-wang
author_facet Chung, Chung-yee
Wong, David Sai-hung
Li, Kenneth Kai-wang
author_sort Chung, Chung-yee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To report a case of late closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) after vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old lady with a stage IV FTMH underwent pars plana vitrectomy with 25 gauge plus transconjunctival system, ILM peeling and gas tamponade. The inverted ILM flap technique was adopted, except that no extra surgical manipulation was used to cover the macular hole with the ILM flap. Surgical outcome was monitored with serial optical coherence tomography (OCT). Complete closure of the FTMH with resolution of intraretinal cystic changes was confirmed on OCT at 16 months postoperatively. Visual acuity improved from a baseline level of 0.1 to 0.4. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic macular hole closure could be delayed to beyond 1 year following the inverted ILM flap technique, especially if the macular hole was not covered with the ILM flap. Not all macular holes that fail to close in the early postoperative period need to be re-operated and there may be no risk of further visual deterioration.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4550061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45500612015-08-27 Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report Chung, Chung-yee Wong, David Sai-hung Li, Kenneth Kai-wang BMC Ophthalmol Case Report BACKGROUND: To report a case of late closure of idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (FTMH) after vitrectomy with the inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) technique. CASE PRESENTATION: A 68-year-old lady with a stage IV FTMH underwent pars plana vitrectomy with 25 gauge plus transconjunctival system, ILM peeling and gas tamponade. The inverted ILM flap technique was adopted, except that no extra surgical manipulation was used to cover the macular hole with the ILM flap. Surgical outcome was monitored with serial optical coherence tomography (OCT). Complete closure of the FTMH with resolution of intraretinal cystic changes was confirmed on OCT at 16 months postoperatively. Visual acuity improved from a baseline level of 0.1 to 0.4. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic macular hole closure could be delayed to beyond 1 year following the inverted ILM flap technique, especially if the macular hole was not covered with the ILM flap. Not all macular holes that fail to close in the early postoperative period need to be re-operated and there may be no risk of further visual deterioration. BioMed Central 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4550061/ /pubmed/26307540 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0104-1 Text en © Chung et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Chung, Chung-yee
Wong, David Sai-hung
Li, Kenneth Kai-wang
Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
title Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
title_full Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
title_fullStr Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
title_full_unstemmed Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
title_short Is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? A case report
title_sort is it necessary to cover the macular hole with the inverted internal limiting membrane flap in macular hole surgery? a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307540
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12886-015-0104-1
work_keys_str_mv AT chungchungyee isitnecessarytocoverthemacularholewiththeinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflapinmacularholesurgeryacasereport
AT wongdavidsaihung isitnecessarytocoverthemacularholewiththeinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflapinmacularholesurgeryacasereport
AT likennethkaiwang isitnecessarytocoverthemacularholewiththeinvertedinternallimitingmembraneflapinmacularholesurgeryacasereport