Cargando…

Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context

Organic farming, a low intensity system, may offer benefits for a range of taxa, but what affects the extent of those benefits is imperfectly understood. We explored the effects of organic farming and landscape on the activity density and species density of spiders and carabid beetles, using a large...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feber, Ruth E., Johnson, Paul J., Bell, James R., Chamberlain, Dan E., Firbank, Leslie G., Fuller, Robert J., Manley, Will, Mathews, Fiona, Norton, Lisa R., Townsend, Martin, Macdonald, David W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135921
_version_ 1782387424518733824
author Feber, Ruth E.
Johnson, Paul J.
Bell, James R.
Chamberlain, Dan E.
Firbank, Leslie G.
Fuller, Robert J.
Manley, Will
Mathews, Fiona
Norton, Lisa R.
Townsend, Martin
Macdonald, David W.
author_facet Feber, Ruth E.
Johnson, Paul J.
Bell, James R.
Chamberlain, Dan E.
Firbank, Leslie G.
Fuller, Robert J.
Manley, Will
Mathews, Fiona
Norton, Lisa R.
Townsend, Martin
Macdonald, David W.
author_sort Feber, Ruth E.
collection PubMed
description Organic farming, a low intensity system, may offer benefits for a range of taxa, but what affects the extent of those benefits is imperfectly understood. We explored the effects of organic farming and landscape on the activity density and species density of spiders and carabid beetles, using a large sample of paired organic and conventional farms in the UK. Spider activity density and species density were influenced by both farming system and surrounding landscape. Hunting spiders, which tend to have lower dispersal capabilities, had higher activity density, and more species were captured, on organic compared to conventional farms. There was also evidence for an interaction, as the farming system effect was particularly marked in the cropped area before harvest and was more pronounced in complex landscapes (those with little arable land). There was no evidence for any effect of farming system or landscape on web-building spiders (which include the linyphiids, many of which have high dispersal capabilities). For carabid beetles, the farming system effects were inconsistent. Before harvest, higher activity densities were observed in the crops on organic farms compared with conventional farms. After harvest, no difference was detected in the cropped area, but more carabids were captured on conventional compared to organic boundaries. Carabids were more species-dense in complex landscapes, and farming system did not affect this. There was little evidence that non-cropped habitat differences explained the farming system effects for either spiders or carabid beetles. For spiders, the farming system effects in the cropped area were probably largely attributable to differences in crop management; reduced inputs of pesticides (herbicides and insecticides) and fertilisers are possible influences, and there was some evidence for an effect of non-crop plant species richness on hunting spider activity density. The benefits of organic farming may be greatest for taxa with lower dispersal abilities generally. The evidence for interactions among landscape and farming system in their effects on spiders highlights the importance of developing strategies for managing farmland at the landscape-scale for most effective conservation of biodiversity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4550245
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45502452015-09-01 Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context Feber, Ruth E. Johnson, Paul J. Bell, James R. Chamberlain, Dan E. Firbank, Leslie G. Fuller, Robert J. Manley, Will Mathews, Fiona Norton, Lisa R. Townsend, Martin Macdonald, David W. PLoS One Research Article Organic farming, a low intensity system, may offer benefits for a range of taxa, but what affects the extent of those benefits is imperfectly understood. We explored the effects of organic farming and landscape on the activity density and species density of spiders and carabid beetles, using a large sample of paired organic and conventional farms in the UK. Spider activity density and species density were influenced by both farming system and surrounding landscape. Hunting spiders, which tend to have lower dispersal capabilities, had higher activity density, and more species were captured, on organic compared to conventional farms. There was also evidence for an interaction, as the farming system effect was particularly marked in the cropped area before harvest and was more pronounced in complex landscapes (those with little arable land). There was no evidence for any effect of farming system or landscape on web-building spiders (which include the linyphiids, many of which have high dispersal capabilities). For carabid beetles, the farming system effects were inconsistent. Before harvest, higher activity densities were observed in the crops on organic farms compared with conventional farms. After harvest, no difference was detected in the cropped area, but more carabids were captured on conventional compared to organic boundaries. Carabids were more species-dense in complex landscapes, and farming system did not affect this. There was little evidence that non-cropped habitat differences explained the farming system effects for either spiders or carabid beetles. For spiders, the farming system effects in the cropped area were probably largely attributable to differences in crop management; reduced inputs of pesticides (herbicides and insecticides) and fertilisers are possible influences, and there was some evidence for an effect of non-crop plant species richness on hunting spider activity density. The benefits of organic farming may be greatest for taxa with lower dispersal abilities generally. The evidence for interactions among landscape and farming system in their effects on spiders highlights the importance of developing strategies for managing farmland at the landscape-scale for most effective conservation of biodiversity. Public Library of Science 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4550245/ /pubmed/26309040 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135921 Text en © 2015 Feber et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Feber, Ruth E.
Johnson, Paul J.
Bell, James R.
Chamberlain, Dan E.
Firbank, Leslie G.
Fuller, Robert J.
Manley, Will
Mathews, Fiona
Norton, Lisa R.
Townsend, Martin
Macdonald, David W.
Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
title Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
title_full Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
title_fullStr Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
title_full_unstemmed Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
title_short Organic Farming: Biodiversity Impacts Can Depend on Dispersal Characteristics and Landscape Context
title_sort organic farming: biodiversity impacts can depend on dispersal characteristics and landscape context
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550245/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26309040
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135921
work_keys_str_mv AT feberruthe organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT johnsonpaulj organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT belljamesr organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT chamberlaindane organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT firbankleslieg organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT fullerrobertj organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT manleywill organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT mathewsfiona organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT nortonlisar organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT townsendmartin organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext
AT macdonalddavidw organicfarmingbiodiversityimpactscandependondispersalcharacteristicsandlandscapecontext