Cargando…

Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer

Various regimens including molecular targeted agents have been examined in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant urothelial cancer (UC). However, some studies have been stopped owing to the development of severe adverse events. The main aim of this study was to examine the anticancer effects, cha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miyata, Yasuyoshi, Asai, Akihiro, Mitsunari, Kensuke, Matsuo, Tomohiro, Ohba, Kojiro, Sakai, Hideki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26310889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0683-y
_version_ 1782387476951728128
author Miyata, Yasuyoshi
Asai, Akihiro
Mitsunari, Kensuke
Matsuo, Tomohiro
Ohba, Kojiro
Sakai, Hideki
author_facet Miyata, Yasuyoshi
Asai, Akihiro
Mitsunari, Kensuke
Matsuo, Tomohiro
Ohba, Kojiro
Sakai, Hideki
author_sort Miyata, Yasuyoshi
collection PubMed
description Various regimens including molecular targeted agents have been examined in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant urothelial cancer (UC). However, some studies have been stopped owing to the development of severe adverse events. The main aim of this study was to examine the anticancer effects, changes in the quality of life (QoL), and safety of combined therapy of low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib (LD-GPS) in patients with CDDP-resistant UC. Twenty patients were treated with gemcitabine (700 mg/m(2) on day 1), paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2) on day 1), and sorafenib (400 mg/day on days 8–22). QoL and pain relief were evaluated using the short-form survey (SF)-36 for bodily pain and the visual analog scale (VAS). VAS scores were significantly decreased by both the second- and third-line therapies (P = 0.012 and 0.028, respectively). The bodily pain score from the SF-36 survey was also significantly (P = 0.012) decreased. Complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease were found in 0 (0.0 %), 1 (5.0 %), and 13 patients (65 %), respectively. The median (interquartile range) period of overall survival after starting of this therapy was 7 (5–11) months. Three patients (15.0 %) stopped therapy because of grade 3 fatigue and hand–foot reactions. LD-GPS therapy was well tolerated by patients with CDDP-resistant UC. QoL was maintained, and improvements in their pain levels were found after treatment; pain relief was detected after third-line therapy. We suggest that this treatment regimen is worthy of consideration as second- and third-line therapy for patients with CDDP-resistant UC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4550651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45506512015-08-28 Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer Miyata, Yasuyoshi Asai, Akihiro Mitsunari, Kensuke Matsuo, Tomohiro Ohba, Kojiro Sakai, Hideki Med Oncol Original Paper Various regimens including molecular targeted agents have been examined in patients with cisplatin (CDDP)-resistant urothelial cancer (UC). However, some studies have been stopped owing to the development of severe adverse events. The main aim of this study was to examine the anticancer effects, changes in the quality of life (QoL), and safety of combined therapy of low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib (LD-GPS) in patients with CDDP-resistant UC. Twenty patients were treated with gemcitabine (700 mg/m(2) on day 1), paclitaxel (70 mg/m(2) on day 1), and sorafenib (400 mg/day on days 8–22). QoL and pain relief were evaluated using the short-form survey (SF)-36 for bodily pain and the visual analog scale (VAS). VAS scores were significantly decreased by both the second- and third-line therapies (P = 0.012 and 0.028, respectively). The bodily pain score from the SF-36 survey was also significantly (P = 0.012) decreased. Complete responses, partial responses, and stable disease were found in 0 (0.0 %), 1 (5.0 %), and 13 patients (65 %), respectively. The median (interquartile range) period of overall survival after starting of this therapy was 7 (5–11) months. Three patients (15.0 %) stopped therapy because of grade 3 fatigue and hand–foot reactions. LD-GPS therapy was well tolerated by patients with CDDP-resistant UC. QoL was maintained, and improvements in their pain levels were found after treatment; pain relief was detected after third-line therapy. We suggest that this treatment regimen is worthy of consideration as second- and third-line therapy for patients with CDDP-resistant UC. Springer US 2015-08-27 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4550651/ /pubmed/26310889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0683-y Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Miyata, Yasuyoshi
Asai, Akihiro
Mitsunari, Kensuke
Matsuo, Tomohiro
Ohba, Kojiro
Sakai, Hideki
Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
title Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
title_full Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
title_fullStr Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
title_full_unstemmed Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
title_short Safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
title_sort safety and efficacy of combination therapy with low-dose gemcitabine, paclitaxel, and sorafenib in patients with cisplatin-resistant urothelial cancer
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26310889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0683-y
work_keys_str_mv AT miyatayasuyoshi safetyandefficacyofcombinationtherapywithlowdosegemcitabinepaclitaxelandsorafenibinpatientswithcisplatinresistanturothelialcancer
AT asaiakihiro safetyandefficacyofcombinationtherapywithlowdosegemcitabinepaclitaxelandsorafenibinpatientswithcisplatinresistanturothelialcancer
AT mitsunarikensuke safetyandefficacyofcombinationtherapywithlowdosegemcitabinepaclitaxelandsorafenibinpatientswithcisplatinresistanturothelialcancer
AT matsuotomohiro safetyandefficacyofcombinationtherapywithlowdosegemcitabinepaclitaxelandsorafenibinpatientswithcisplatinresistanturothelialcancer
AT ohbakojiro safetyandefficacyofcombinationtherapywithlowdosegemcitabinepaclitaxelandsorafenibinpatientswithcisplatinresistanturothelialcancer
AT sakaihideki safetyandefficacyofcombinationtherapywithlowdosegemcitabinepaclitaxelandsorafenibinpatientswithcisplatinresistanturothelialcancer