Cargando…

Effects of telephone-delivered lifestyle support on the development of diabetes in participants at high risk of type 2 diabetes: J-DOIT1, a pragmatic cluster randomised trial

OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of telephone-delivered lifestyle coaching on preventing the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in participants with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: 40 groups from 17 healthcare divisions in Japan: companies (31...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sakane, Naoki, Kotani, Kazuhiko, Takahashi, Kaoru, Sano, Yoshiko, Tsuzaki, Kokoro, Okazaki, Kentaro, Sato, Juichi, Suzuki, Sadao, Morita, Satoshi, Oshima, Yoshitake, Izumi, Kazuo, Kato, Masayuki, Ishizuka, Naoki, Noda, Mitsuhiko, Kuzuya, Hideshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26289448
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-007316
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of telephone-delivered lifestyle coaching on preventing the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in participants with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). DESIGN: Cluster randomised trial. SETTING: 40 groups from 17 healthcare divisions in Japan: companies (31), communities (6) and mixed settings (3). PARTICIPANTS: Participants aged 20–65 years with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 5.6–6.9 mmol/L were invited from the 17 healthcare divisions. RANDOMISATION: The groups were then randomly assigned to an intervention or a control arm by independent statisticians according to a computer-generated list. INTERVENTION: The intervention arm received a 1-year telephone-delivered intervention provided by three private lifestyle support centres (at different frequencies: low-frequency (3 times), middle-frequency (6 times) and high-frequency (10 times) support calls). The intervention and control arms both received self-help devices such as a weight scale and pedometer. OUTCOMES: Participants were followed up using data from annual health check-ups and a questionnaire regarding lifestyle. The primary outcome was the development of T2DM defined as FPG ≥7.0 mmol/L, the diagnosis of diabetes, or use of an antidiabetic drug, confirmed by referring to medical cards. RESULTS: Of 14 473 screened individuals, participants were enrolled in either the intervention (n=1240) arm or control (n=1367) arm. Overall, the HR for the development of T2DM in the intervention arm during 5.5 years was 1.00 (95% CI 0.74 to 1.34). In the subanalysis, the HR was 0.59 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.83) in the subgroup that received phone calls the most frequently, compared with the control arm. A limitation of the study includes a lack of blinding. CONCLUSIONS: High-frequency telephone-delivered lifestyle support could effectively prevent T2DM in participants with IFG in a primary healthcare setting, although low-frequency and middle-frequency phone calls did not. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This trial has been registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN000000662).