Cargando…
The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study
INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention that has been recommended in guidelines to be available to those who may benefit. However, not all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have access to this service. Healthcare services have shown the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008055 |
_version_ | 1782387488972603392 |
---|---|
author | Chaplin, Emma Hewitt, Stacey Apps, Lindsay Edwards, Kelly Brough, Chris Glab, Aga Bankart, John Jacobs, Ruth Boyce, Sally Williams, Johanna Singh, Sally |
author_facet | Chaplin, Emma Hewitt, Stacey Apps, Lindsay Edwards, Kelly Brough, Chris Glab, Aga Bankart, John Jacobs, Ruth Boyce, Sally Williams, Johanna Singh, Sally |
author_sort | Chaplin, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention that has been recommended in guidelines to be available to those who may benefit. However, not all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have access to this service. Healthcare services have shown the need for the provision of PR in other forms to enable patient choice and service capacity. There is an increase in evidence for the use of the internet in the management of long-term conditions to provide education and promote self-management. The aim of this study is to see if an interactive web-based PR programme is a feasible alternative compared with conventional PR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a feasibility study designed to evaluate the efficacy of providing a web-based PR programme to improve patients exercise capacity, quality of life and promote self-management in patients with moderate to severe COPD compared with conventional PR programmes. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated to receive either the web-based programme or conventional rehabilitation programme for 7 weeks using an internet-based randomisation system. Participants will be recruited from PR assessments, primary care and community rehabilitation programmes. Those randomised to the web-based programme work through the website which contains all the information that the patients receive in the PR classes. They receive weekly phone calls by a professional to help progress through the course on line. The outcome measures will be recruitment rates and eligibility as well as that standard for a PR assessment including measures of exercise capacity, quality of life questionnaires and physical activity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research ethics committee for Northampton has provided ethical approval for the conduct of the study. The results of the study will be disseminated through appropriate conference presentations and peer reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN03142263. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4550734 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45507342015-08-31 The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study Chaplin, Emma Hewitt, Stacey Apps, Lindsay Edwards, Kelly Brough, Chris Glab, Aga Bankart, John Jacobs, Ruth Boyce, Sally Williams, Johanna Singh, Sally BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary Rehabilitation (PR) is an evidence-based intervention that has been recommended in guidelines to be available to those who may benefit. However, not all patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have access to this service. Healthcare services have shown the need for the provision of PR in other forms to enable patient choice and service capacity. There is an increase in evidence for the use of the internet in the management of long-term conditions to provide education and promote self-management. The aim of this study is to see if an interactive web-based PR programme is a feasible alternative compared with conventional PR. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a feasibility study designed to evaluate the efficacy of providing a web-based PR programme to improve patients exercise capacity, quality of life and promote self-management in patients with moderate to severe COPD compared with conventional PR programmes. Eligible patients will be randomly allocated to receive either the web-based programme or conventional rehabilitation programme for 7 weeks using an internet-based randomisation system. Participants will be recruited from PR assessments, primary care and community rehabilitation programmes. Those randomised to the web-based programme work through the website which contains all the information that the patients receive in the PR classes. They receive weekly phone calls by a professional to help progress through the course on line. The outcome measures will be recruitment rates and eligibility as well as that standard for a PR assessment including measures of exercise capacity, quality of life questionnaires and physical activity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The research ethics committee for Northampton has provided ethical approval for the conduct of the study. The results of the study will be disseminated through appropriate conference presentations and peer reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN03142263. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4550734/ /pubmed/26307616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008055 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Chaplin, Emma Hewitt, Stacey Apps, Lindsay Edwards, Kelly Brough, Chris Glab, Aga Bankart, John Jacobs, Ruth Boyce, Sally Williams, Johanna Singh, Sally The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study |
title | The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study |
title_full | The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study |
title_fullStr | The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study |
title_short | The evaluation of an interactive web-based Pulmonary Rehabilitation programme: protocol for the WEB SPACE for COPD feasibility study |
title_sort | evaluation of an interactive web-based pulmonary rehabilitation programme: protocol for the web space for copd feasibility study |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550734/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26307616 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008055 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chaplinemma theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT hewittstacey theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT appslindsay theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT edwardskelly theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT broughchris theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT glabaga theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT bankartjohn theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT jacobsruth theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT boycesally theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT williamsjohanna theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT singhsally theevaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT chaplinemma evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT hewittstacey evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT appslindsay evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT edwardskelly evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT broughchris evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT glabaga evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT bankartjohn evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT jacobsruth evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT boycesally evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT williamsjohanna evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy AT singhsally evaluationofaninteractivewebbasedpulmonaryrehabilitationprogrammeprotocolforthewebspaceforcopdfeasibilitystudy |