Cargando…

Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers

Embodied cognitive theories predict that linguistic conceptual representations are grounded and continually represented in real world, sensorimotor experiences. However, there is an on-going debate on whether this also holds for abstract concepts. Grammar is the archetype of abstract knowledge, and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobben, Marit, D’Ascenzo, Stefania
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01299
_version_ 1782387492872257536
author Lobben, Marit
D’Ascenzo, Stefania
author_facet Lobben, Marit
D’Ascenzo, Stefania
author_sort Lobben, Marit
collection PubMed
description Embodied cognitive theories predict that linguistic conceptual representations are grounded and continually represented in real world, sensorimotor experiences. However, there is an on-going debate on whether this also holds for abstract concepts. Grammar is the archetype of abstract knowledge, and therefore constitutes a test case against embodied theories of language representation. Former studies have largely focussed on lexical-level embodied representations. In the present study we take the grounding-by-modality idea a step further by using reaction time (RT) data from the linguistic processing of nominal classifiers in Chinese. We take advantage of an independent body of research, which shows that attention in hand space is biased. Specifically, objects near the hand consistently yield shorter RTs as a function of readiness for action on graspable objects within reaching space, and the same biased attention inhibits attentional disengagement. We predicted that this attention bias would equally apply to the graspable object classifier but not to the big object classifier. Chinese speakers (N = 22) judged grammatical congruency of classifier-noun combinations in two conditions: graspable object classifier and big object classifier. We found that RTs for the graspable object classifier were significantly faster in congruent combinations, and significantly slower in incongruent combinations, than the big object classifier. There was no main effect on grammatical violations, but rather an interaction effect of classifier type. Thus, we demonstrate here grammatical category-specific effects pertaining to the semantic content and by extension the visual and tactile modality of acquisition underlying the acquisition of these categories. We conclude that abstract grammatical categories are subjected to the same mechanisms as general cognitive and neurophysiological processes and may therefore be grounded.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4550751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45507512015-09-14 Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers Lobben, Marit D’Ascenzo, Stefania Front Psychol Psychology Embodied cognitive theories predict that linguistic conceptual representations are grounded and continually represented in real world, sensorimotor experiences. However, there is an on-going debate on whether this also holds for abstract concepts. Grammar is the archetype of abstract knowledge, and therefore constitutes a test case against embodied theories of language representation. Former studies have largely focussed on lexical-level embodied representations. In the present study we take the grounding-by-modality idea a step further by using reaction time (RT) data from the linguistic processing of nominal classifiers in Chinese. We take advantage of an independent body of research, which shows that attention in hand space is biased. Specifically, objects near the hand consistently yield shorter RTs as a function of readiness for action on graspable objects within reaching space, and the same biased attention inhibits attentional disengagement. We predicted that this attention bias would equally apply to the graspable object classifier but not to the big object classifier. Chinese speakers (N = 22) judged grammatical congruency of classifier-noun combinations in two conditions: graspable object classifier and big object classifier. We found that RTs for the graspable object classifier were significantly faster in congruent combinations, and significantly slower in incongruent combinations, than the big object classifier. There was no main effect on grammatical violations, but rather an interaction effect of classifier type. Thus, we demonstrate here grammatical category-specific effects pertaining to the semantic content and by extension the visual and tactile modality of acquisition underlying the acquisition of these categories. We conclude that abstract grammatical categories are subjected to the same mechanisms as general cognitive and neurophysiological processes and may therefore be grounded. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4550751/ /pubmed/26379611 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01299 Text en Copyright © 2015 Lobben and D’Ascenzo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Lobben, Marit
D’Ascenzo, Stefania
Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers
title Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers
title_full Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers
title_fullStr Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers
title_full_unstemmed Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers
title_short Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers
title_sort grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of chinese nominal classifiers
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4550751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379611
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01299
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbenmarit groundinggrammaticalcategoriesattentionbiasinhandspaceinfluencesgrammaticalcongruencyjudgmentofchinesenominalclassifiers
AT dascenzostefania groundinggrammaticalcategoriesattentionbiasinhandspaceinfluencesgrammaticalcongruencyjudgmentofchinesenominalclassifiers