Cargando…
Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy
BACKGROUND: Biosimilars of filgrastim are in widespread clinical use in Europe. This phase III study compares biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006), with the US-licensed reference product, Neupogen(®), in breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy (TAC). PATIENTS AND METHO...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv281 |
_version_ | 1782387542233972736 |
---|---|
author | Blackwell, K. Semiglazov, V. Krasnozhon, D. Davidenko, I. Nelyubina, L. Nakov, R. Stiegler, G. Singh, P. Schwebig, A. Kramer, S. Harbeck, N. |
author_facet | Blackwell, K. Semiglazov, V. Krasnozhon, D. Davidenko, I. Nelyubina, L. Nakov, R. Stiegler, G. Singh, P. Schwebig, A. Kramer, S. Harbeck, N. |
author_sort | Blackwell, K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Biosimilars of filgrastim are in widespread clinical use in Europe. This phase III study compares biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006), with the US-licensed reference product, Neupogen(®), in breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy (TAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 218 patients receiving 5 µg/kg/day filgrastim over six chemotherapy cycles were randomized 1:1:1:1 into four arms. Two arms received only one product (nonalternating), biosimilar or reference, and two arms (alternating) received alternating treatments during each cycle (biosimilar then reference or vice versa). The primary end point was duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) during cycle 1. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were balanced between the four treatment arms. Noninferiority of biosimilar versus the reference was demonstrated: DSN (days) in cycle 1 was 1.17 ± 1.11 (biosimilar, N = 101) and 1.20 ± 1.02 (reference, N = 103), 97.5% confidence interval lower boundary for the difference was −0.26 days (above the predefined limit of −1 day). No clinically meaningful differences were observed regarding any other efficacy parameter: incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN); hospitalization due to FN; incidence of infections; depth and time of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir and time to ANC recovery during cycle 1 and across all cycles. The pattern and frequency of adverse events were similar across all treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that biosimilar and the reference filgrastim are similar with no clinically meaningful differences regarding efficacy and safety in prevention of severe neutropenia. Biosimilar filgrastim could represent an important alternative to the reference product, potentially benefiting public health by increasing access to filgrastim treatment. STUDY NUMBER: NCT01519700. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4551159 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45511592015-08-28 Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy Blackwell, K. Semiglazov, V. Krasnozhon, D. Davidenko, I. Nelyubina, L. Nakov, R. Stiegler, G. Singh, P. Schwebig, A. Kramer, S. Harbeck, N. Ann Oncol Original Articles BACKGROUND: Biosimilars of filgrastim are in widespread clinical use in Europe. This phase III study compares biosimilar filgrastim (EP2006), with the US-licensed reference product, Neupogen(®), in breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant myelosuppressive chemotherapy (TAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 218 patients receiving 5 µg/kg/day filgrastim over six chemotherapy cycles were randomized 1:1:1:1 into four arms. Two arms received only one product (nonalternating), biosimilar or reference, and two arms (alternating) received alternating treatments during each cycle (biosimilar then reference or vice versa). The primary end point was duration of severe neutropenia (DSN) during cycle 1. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were balanced between the four treatment arms. Noninferiority of biosimilar versus the reference was demonstrated: DSN (days) in cycle 1 was 1.17 ± 1.11 (biosimilar, N = 101) and 1.20 ± 1.02 (reference, N = 103), 97.5% confidence interval lower boundary for the difference was −0.26 days (above the predefined limit of −1 day). No clinically meaningful differences were observed regarding any other efficacy parameter: incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN); hospitalization due to FN; incidence of infections; depth and time of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir and time to ANC recovery during cycle 1 and across all cycles. The pattern and frequency of adverse events were similar across all treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that biosimilar and the reference filgrastim are similar with no clinically meaningful differences regarding efficacy and safety in prevention of severe neutropenia. Biosimilar filgrastim could represent an important alternative to the reference product, potentially benefiting public health by increasing access to filgrastim treatment. STUDY NUMBER: NCT01519700. Oxford University Press 2015-09 2015-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4551159/ /pubmed/26122726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv281 Text en © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Blackwell, K. Semiglazov, V. Krasnozhon, D. Davidenko, I. Nelyubina, L. Nakov, R. Stiegler, G. Singh, P. Schwebig, A. Kramer, S. Harbeck, N. Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title | Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_full | Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_short | Comparison of EP2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase III, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
title_sort | comparison of ep2006, a filgrastim biosimilar, to the reference: a phase iii, randomized, double-blind clinical study in the prevention of severe neutropenia in patients with breast cancer receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551159/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv281 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blackwellk comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT semiglazovv comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT krasnozhond comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT davidenkoi comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT nelyubinal comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT nakovr comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT stieglerg comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT singhp comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT schwebiga comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT kramers comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy AT harbeckn comparisonofep2006afilgrastimbiosimilartothereferenceaphaseiiirandomizeddoubleblindclinicalstudyinthepreventionofsevereneutropeniainpatientswithbreastcancerreceivingmyelosuppressivechemotherapy |