Cargando…

The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place

We report findings from a study that set out to explore the experience of older people living with assisted living technologies and care services. We find that successful ‘ageing in place’ is socially and collaboratively accomplished – ‘co-produced’ – day-to-day by the efforts of older people, and t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Procter, Rob, Greenhalgh, Trisha, Wherton, Joe, Sugarhood, Paul, Rouncefield, Mark, Hinder, Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5
_version_ 1782387542683811840
author Procter, Rob
Greenhalgh, Trisha
Wherton, Joe
Sugarhood, Paul
Rouncefield, Mark
Hinder, Sue
author_facet Procter, Rob
Greenhalgh, Trisha
Wherton, Joe
Sugarhood, Paul
Rouncefield, Mark
Hinder, Sue
author_sort Procter, Rob
collection PubMed
description We report findings from a study that set out to explore the experience of older people living with assisted living technologies and care services. We find that successful ‘ageing in place’ is socially and collaboratively accomplished – ‘co-produced’ – day-to-day by the efforts of older people, and their formal and informal networks of carers (e.g. family, friends, neighbours). First, we reveal how ‘bricolage’ allows care recipients and family members to customise assisted living technologies to individual needs. We argue that making customisation easier through better design must be part of making assisted living technologies ‘work’. Second, we draw attention to the importance of formal and informal carers establishing and maintaining mutual awareness of the older person’s circumstances day-to-day so they can act in a concerted and coordinated way when problems arise. Unfortunately, neither the design of most current assisted living technologies, nor the ways care services are typically configured, acknowledges these realities of ageing in place. We conclude that rather than more ‘advanced’ technologies, the success of ageing in place programmes will depend on effortful alignments in the technical, organisational and social configuration of support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4551166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45511662015-08-28 The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place Procter, Rob Greenhalgh, Trisha Wherton, Joe Sugarhood, Paul Rouncefield, Mark Hinder, Sue Comput Support Coop Work Article We report findings from a study that set out to explore the experience of older people living with assisted living technologies and care services. We find that successful ‘ageing in place’ is socially and collaboratively accomplished – ‘co-produced’ – day-to-day by the efforts of older people, and their formal and informal networks of carers (e.g. family, friends, neighbours). First, we reveal how ‘bricolage’ allows care recipients and family members to customise assisted living technologies to individual needs. We argue that making customisation easier through better design must be part of making assisted living technologies ‘work’. Second, we draw attention to the importance of formal and informal carers establishing and maintaining mutual awareness of the older person’s circumstances day-to-day so they can act in a concerted and coordinated way when problems arise. Unfortunately, neither the design of most current assisted living technologies, nor the ways care services are typically configured, acknowledges these realities of ageing in place. We conclude that rather than more ‘advanced’ technologies, the success of ageing in place programmes will depend on effortful alignments in the technical, organisational and social configuration of support. Springer Netherlands 2014-04-22 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4551166/ /pubmed/26321795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Procter, Rob
Greenhalgh, Trisha
Wherton, Joe
Sugarhood, Paul
Rouncefield, Mark
Hinder, Sue
The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
title The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
title_full The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
title_fullStr The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
title_full_unstemmed The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
title_short The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
title_sort day-to-day co-production of ageing in place
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5
work_keys_str_mv AT procterrob thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT greenhalghtrisha thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT whertonjoe thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT sugarhoodpaul thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT rouncefieldmark thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT hindersue thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT procterrob daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT greenhalghtrisha daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT whertonjoe daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT sugarhoodpaul daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT rouncefieldmark daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace
AT hindersue daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace