Cargando…
The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place
We report findings from a study that set out to explore the experience of older people living with assisted living technologies and care services. We find that successful ‘ageing in place’ is socially and collaboratively accomplished – ‘co-produced’ – day-to-day by the efforts of older people, and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5 |
_version_ | 1782387542683811840 |
---|---|
author | Procter, Rob Greenhalgh, Trisha Wherton, Joe Sugarhood, Paul Rouncefield, Mark Hinder, Sue |
author_facet | Procter, Rob Greenhalgh, Trisha Wherton, Joe Sugarhood, Paul Rouncefield, Mark Hinder, Sue |
author_sort | Procter, Rob |
collection | PubMed |
description | We report findings from a study that set out to explore the experience of older people living with assisted living technologies and care services. We find that successful ‘ageing in place’ is socially and collaboratively accomplished – ‘co-produced’ – day-to-day by the efforts of older people, and their formal and informal networks of carers (e.g. family, friends, neighbours). First, we reveal how ‘bricolage’ allows care recipients and family members to customise assisted living technologies to individual needs. We argue that making customisation easier through better design must be part of making assisted living technologies ‘work’. Second, we draw attention to the importance of formal and informal carers establishing and maintaining mutual awareness of the older person’s circumstances day-to-day so they can act in a concerted and coordinated way when problems arise. Unfortunately, neither the design of most current assisted living technologies, nor the ways care services are typically configured, acknowledges these realities of ageing in place. We conclude that rather than more ‘advanced’ technologies, the success of ageing in place programmes will depend on effortful alignments in the technical, organisational and social configuration of support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4551166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Springer Netherlands |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45511662015-08-28 The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place Procter, Rob Greenhalgh, Trisha Wherton, Joe Sugarhood, Paul Rouncefield, Mark Hinder, Sue Comput Support Coop Work Article We report findings from a study that set out to explore the experience of older people living with assisted living technologies and care services. We find that successful ‘ageing in place’ is socially and collaboratively accomplished – ‘co-produced’ – day-to-day by the efforts of older people, and their formal and informal networks of carers (e.g. family, friends, neighbours). First, we reveal how ‘bricolage’ allows care recipients and family members to customise assisted living technologies to individual needs. We argue that making customisation easier through better design must be part of making assisted living technologies ‘work’. Second, we draw attention to the importance of formal and informal carers establishing and maintaining mutual awareness of the older person’s circumstances day-to-day so they can act in a concerted and coordinated way when problems arise. Unfortunately, neither the design of most current assisted living technologies, nor the ways care services are typically configured, acknowledges these realities of ageing in place. We conclude that rather than more ‘advanced’ technologies, the success of ageing in place programmes will depend on effortful alignments in the technical, organisational and social configuration of support. Springer Netherlands 2014-04-22 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4551166/ /pubmed/26321795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Procter, Rob Greenhalgh, Trisha Wherton, Joe Sugarhood, Paul Rouncefield, Mark Hinder, Sue The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place |
title | The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place |
title_full | The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place |
title_fullStr | The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place |
title_full_unstemmed | The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place |
title_short | The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place |
title_sort | day-to-day co-production of ageing in place |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26321795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT procterrob thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT greenhalghtrisha thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT whertonjoe thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT sugarhoodpaul thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT rouncefieldmark thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT hindersue thedaytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT procterrob daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT greenhalghtrisha daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT whertonjoe daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT sugarhoodpaul daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT rouncefieldmark daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace AT hindersue daytodaycoproductionofageinginplace |