Cargando…

A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium

We compare methods for estimating the residual resistivity ratio (RRR) of high-purity niobium and investigate the effects of using different functional models. RRR is typically defined as the ratio of the electrical resistances measured at 273 K (the ice point) and 4.2 K (the boiling point of helium...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Splett, J. D., Vecchia, D. F., Goodrich, L. F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26989580
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.116.001
_version_ 1782387547223097344
author Splett, J. D.
Vecchia, D. F.
Goodrich, L. F.
author_facet Splett, J. D.
Vecchia, D. F.
Goodrich, L. F.
author_sort Splett, J. D.
collection PubMed
description We compare methods for estimating the residual resistivity ratio (RRR) of high-purity niobium and investigate the effects of using different functional models. RRR is typically defined as the ratio of the electrical resistances measured at 273 K (the ice point) and 4.2 K (the boiling point of helium at standard atmospheric pressure). However, pure niobium is superconducting below about 9.3 K, so the low-temperature resistance is defined as the normal-state (i.e., non-superconducting state) resistance extrapolated to 4.2 K and zero magnetic field. Thus, the estimated value of RRR depends significantly on the model used for extrapolation. We examine three models for extrapolation based on temperature versus resistance, two models for extrapolation based on magnetic field versus resistance, and a new model based on the Kohler relationship that can be applied to combined temperature and field data. We also investigate the possibility of re-defining RRR so that the quantity is not dependent on extrapolation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4551274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45512742016-03-17 A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium Splett, J. D. Vecchia, D. F. Goodrich, L. F. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol Article We compare methods for estimating the residual resistivity ratio (RRR) of high-purity niobium and investigate the effects of using different functional models. RRR is typically defined as the ratio of the electrical resistances measured at 273 K (the ice point) and 4.2 K (the boiling point of helium at standard atmospheric pressure). However, pure niobium is superconducting below about 9.3 K, so the low-temperature resistance is defined as the normal-state (i.e., non-superconducting state) resistance extrapolated to 4.2 K and zero magnetic field. Thus, the estimated value of RRR depends significantly on the model used for extrapolation. We examine three models for extrapolation based on temperature versus resistance, two models for extrapolation based on magnetic field versus resistance, and a new model based on the Kohler relationship that can be applied to combined temperature and field data. We also investigate the possibility of re-defining RRR so that the quantity is not dependent on extrapolation. [Gaithersburg, MD] : U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology 2011 2011-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4551274/ /pubmed/26989580 http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.116.001 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ The Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology is a publication of the U.S. Government. The papers are in the public domain and are not subject to copyright in the United States. Articles from J Res may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Article
Splett, J. D.
Vecchia, D. F.
Goodrich, L. F.
A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium
title A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium
title_full A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium
title_fullStr A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium
title_short A Comparison of Methods for Computing the Residual Resistivity Ratio of High-Purity Niobium
title_sort comparison of methods for computing the residual resistivity ratio of high-purity niobium
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26989580
http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/jres.116.001
work_keys_str_mv AT splettjd acomparisonofmethodsforcomputingtheresidualresistivityratioofhighpurityniobium
AT vecchiadf acomparisonofmethodsforcomputingtheresidualresistivityratioofhighpurityniobium
AT goodrichlf acomparisonofmethodsforcomputingtheresidualresistivityratioofhighpurityniobium
AT splettjd comparisonofmethodsforcomputingtheresidualresistivityratioofhighpurityniobium
AT vecchiadf comparisonofmethodsforcomputingtheresidualresistivityratioofhighpurityniobium
AT goodrichlf comparisonofmethodsforcomputingtheresidualresistivityratioofhighpurityniobium