Cargando…

Correlation between mass and volume of collected blood with positivity of blood cultures

BACKGROUND: The collection of blood cultures is an extremely important method in the management of patients with suspected infection. Microbiology laboratories should monitor blood culture collection. METHODS: Over an 8-month period we developed a prospective, observational study in an adult Intensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neves, Lariessa, Marra, Alexandre Rodrigues, Camargo, Thiago Zinsly Sampaio, dos Santos, Maura Cristina, Zulin, Flávia, da Silva, Patrícia Candido, de Moura, Natália Ariede, da Silva Victor, Elivane, Pasternak, Jacyr, dos Santos, Oscar Fernando Pavão, Edmond, Michael B., Martino, Marines Dalla Valle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551380/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26311144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-015-1365-8
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The collection of blood cultures is an extremely important method in the management of patients with suspected infection. Microbiology laboratories should monitor blood culture collection. METHODS: Over an 8-month period we developed a prospective, observational study in an adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU). We correlated the mass contained in the blood vials with blood culture positivity and we also verified the relationship between the mass of blood and blood volume collected for the diagnosis of bloodstream infection (BSI), as well as we explored factors predicting positive blood cultures. RESULTS: We evaluated 345 patients with sepsis, severe sepsis or septic shock for whom blood culture bottles were collected for the diagnosis of BSI. Of the 55 patients with BSI, 40.0 % had peripheral blood culture collection only. BSIs were classified as nosocomial in 34.5 %. In the multivariate model, the blood culture mass (in grams) remained a significant predictor of positivity, with an odds ratio 1.01 (i.e., for each additional 1 mL of blood collected there was a 1 % increase in positivity; 95 % CI 1.01–1.02, p = 0.001; Nagelkerke R Square [R(2)] = 0.192). For blood volume collected, the adjusted odds ratio was estimated at 1.02 (95 % CI: 1.01–1.03, p < 0.001; R(2) = 0.199). For each set of collected blood cultures beyond one set, the adjusted odds ratio was estimated to be 1.27 (95 % CI: 1.14–1.41, p < 0.001; R(2) = 0.221). CONCLUSIONS: Our study was a quality improvement project that showed that microbiology laboratories can use the weight of blood culture bottles to determine if appropriate volume has been collected to improve the diagnosis of BSI.