Cargando…

Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions

The distribution of dental tissues in mammalian herbivores can be very different from taxon to taxon. While grazers tend to have more elaborated and complexly folded enamel ridges, browsers have less complex enamel ridges which can even be so far reduced that they are completely lost. The gradient i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Winkler, Daniela E., Kaiser, Thomas M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135716
_version_ 1782387620319330304
author Winkler, Daniela E.
Kaiser, Thomas M.
author_facet Winkler, Daniela E.
Kaiser, Thomas M.
author_sort Winkler, Daniela E.
collection PubMed
description The distribution of dental tissues in mammalian herbivores can be very different from taxon to taxon. While grazers tend to have more elaborated and complexly folded enamel ridges, browsers have less complex enamel ridges which can even be so far reduced that they are completely lost. The gradient in relative enamel content and complexity of structures has so far not been addressed within a single species. However, several studies have noted tooth position specific wear rates in small mammals (rabbits, guinea pigs) which may be related to individual tooth morphology. We investigate whether differentiated enamel content by tooth position is also to be found in large herbivores. We use CT-scanning techniques to quantify relative enamel content in upper and lower molar teeth of 21 large herbivorous mammal species. By using a broad approach and including both perissodactyls and artiodactyls, we address phylogenetic intraspecific differences in relative enamel content. We find that enamel is highly unevenly distributed among molars (upper M1, M2, M3 and lower m1, m2, m3) in most taxa and that relative enamel content is independent of phylogeny. Overall, relative enamel content increases along the molar tooth row and is significantly higher in lower molars compared to upper molars. We relate this differential enamel content to prolonged mineralisation in the posterior tooth positions and suggest a compensatory function of m3 and M3 for functional losses of anterior teeth.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4551798
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45517982015-09-01 Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions Winkler, Daniela E. Kaiser, Thomas M. PLoS One Research Article The distribution of dental tissues in mammalian herbivores can be very different from taxon to taxon. While grazers tend to have more elaborated and complexly folded enamel ridges, browsers have less complex enamel ridges which can even be so far reduced that they are completely lost. The gradient in relative enamel content and complexity of structures has so far not been addressed within a single species. However, several studies have noted tooth position specific wear rates in small mammals (rabbits, guinea pigs) which may be related to individual tooth morphology. We investigate whether differentiated enamel content by tooth position is also to be found in large herbivores. We use CT-scanning techniques to quantify relative enamel content in upper and lower molar teeth of 21 large herbivorous mammal species. By using a broad approach and including both perissodactyls and artiodactyls, we address phylogenetic intraspecific differences in relative enamel content. We find that enamel is highly unevenly distributed among molars (upper M1, M2, M3 and lower m1, m2, m3) in most taxa and that relative enamel content is independent of phylogeny. Overall, relative enamel content increases along the molar tooth row and is significantly higher in lower molars compared to upper molars. We relate this differential enamel content to prolonged mineralisation in the posterior tooth positions and suggest a compensatory function of m3 and M3 for functional losses of anterior teeth. Public Library of Science 2015-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4551798/ /pubmed/26313359 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135716 Text en © 2015 Winkler, Kaiser http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Winkler, Daniela E.
Kaiser, Thomas M.
Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions
title Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions
title_full Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions
title_fullStr Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions
title_full_unstemmed Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions
title_short Structural Morphology of Molars in Large Mammalian Herbivores: Enamel Content Varies between Tooth Positions
title_sort structural morphology of molars in large mammalian herbivores: enamel content varies between tooth positions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551798/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313359
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135716
work_keys_str_mv AT winklerdanielae structuralmorphologyofmolarsinlargemammalianherbivoresenamelcontentvariesbetweentoothpositions
AT kaiserthomasm structuralmorphologyofmolarsinlargemammalianherbivoresenamelcontentvariesbetweentoothpositions