Cargando…

Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness

Commonly complex cognitive concepts cannot consistently be connected to simple features of the world. Geometrical shape parameters and (e.g., edge features, compactness, color) may play a role for defining individual objects, but might be too variable to allow for concept formation. Earlier works ha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wörgötter, Florentin, Sutterlütti, Rahel M., Tamosiunaite, Minija
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01317
_version_ 1782387625837985792
author Wörgötter, Florentin
Sutterlütti, Rahel M.
Tamosiunaite, Minija
author_facet Wörgötter, Florentin
Sutterlütti, Rahel M.
Tamosiunaite, Minija
author_sort Wörgötter, Florentin
collection PubMed
description Commonly complex cognitive concepts cannot consistently be connected to simple features of the world. Geometrical shape parameters and (e.g., edge features, compactness, color) may play a role for defining individual objects, but might be too variable to allow for concept formation. Earlier works had suggested that the formation of object concepts is strongly influenced by the division of our world along convex to concave surface transitions. In this first paper in a sequence of two we address this issue using abstract 3D geometrical structures (polycubes). In a first experiment, we let our subjects manipulate and compare polycubes with different compactness and different concavity/convexity asking which of them they would perceive as “an object.” Both parameters (compactness and concavity/convexity) are not correlated in these stimuli. Nonetheless, we find that subjects with clear prevalence choose compact and convex ones. We continue to ask how strongly this influences the way we construct objects. Thus, in a second experiment we let humans combine polycubes to form an object. Also here we find that they prefer compact and convex configurations. This suggests that this simple geometric feature may underlie our cognitive understanding of objectness not only with respect to perception but also by influencing how we build our world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4551822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45518222015-09-14 Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness Wörgötter, Florentin Sutterlütti, Rahel M. Tamosiunaite, Minija Front Psychol Psychology Commonly complex cognitive concepts cannot consistently be connected to simple features of the world. Geometrical shape parameters and (e.g., edge features, compactness, color) may play a role for defining individual objects, but might be too variable to allow for concept formation. Earlier works had suggested that the formation of object concepts is strongly influenced by the division of our world along convex to concave surface transitions. In this first paper in a sequence of two we address this issue using abstract 3D geometrical structures (polycubes). In a first experiment, we let our subjects manipulate and compare polycubes with different compactness and different concavity/convexity asking which of them they would perceive as “an object.” Both parameters (compactness and concavity/convexity) are not correlated in these stimuli. Nonetheless, we find that subjects with clear prevalence choose compact and convex ones. We continue to ask how strongly this influences the way we construct objects. Thus, in a second experiment we let humans combine polycubes to form an object. Also here we find that they prefer compact and convex configurations. This suggests that this simple geometric feature may underlie our cognitive understanding of objectness not only with respect to perception but also by influencing how we build our world. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4551822/ /pubmed/26379613 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01317 Text en Copyright © 2015 Wörgötter, Sutterlütti and Tamosiunaite. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wörgötter, Florentin
Sutterlütti, Rahel M.
Tamosiunaite, Minija
Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
title Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
title_full Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
title_fullStr Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
title_full_unstemmed Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
title_short Perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
title_sort perceptual influence of elementary three-dimensional geometry: (1) objectness
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379613
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01317
work_keys_str_mv AT worgotterflorentin perceptualinfluenceofelementarythreedimensionalgeometry1objectness
AT sutterluttirahelm perceptualinfluenceofelementarythreedimensionalgeometry1objectness
AT tamosiunaiteminija perceptualinfluenceofelementarythreedimensionalgeometry1objectness