Cargando…

Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review

Weeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harding, Dylan P., Raizada, Manish N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00659
_version_ 1782387627639439360
author Harding, Dylan P.
Raizada, Manish N.
author_facet Harding, Dylan P.
Raizada, Manish N.
author_sort Harding, Dylan P.
collection PubMed
description Weeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has received increasingly great attention over the last three decades. Proposed benefits to this strategy include reduced environmental impact, increased target specificity, reduced development costs compared to conventional herbicides and the identification of novel herbicidal mechanisms. This review focuses on examples from North America. Among fungi, the prominent genera to receive attention as bioherbicide candidates include Colletotrichum, Phoma, and Sclerotinia. Among bacteria, Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas share this distinction. The available reports on the application of viruses to controlling weeds are also reviewed. Focus is given to the phytotoxic mechanisms associated with bioherbicide candidates. Achieving consistent suppression of weeds in field conditions is a common challenge to this control strategy, as the efficacy of a bioherbicide candidate is generally more sensitive to environmental variation than a conventional herbicide. Common themes and lessons emerging from the available literature in regard to this challenge are presented. Additionally, future directions for this crop protection strategy are suggested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4551831
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45518312015-09-14 Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review Harding, Dylan P. Raizada, Manish N. Front Plant Sci Plant Science Weeds are a nuisance in a variety of land uses. The increasing prevalence of both herbicide resistant weeds and bans on cosmetic pesticide use has created a strong impetus to develop novel strategies for controlling weeds. The application of bacteria, fungi and viruses to achieving this goal has received increasingly great attention over the last three decades. Proposed benefits to this strategy include reduced environmental impact, increased target specificity, reduced development costs compared to conventional herbicides and the identification of novel herbicidal mechanisms. This review focuses on examples from North America. Among fungi, the prominent genera to receive attention as bioherbicide candidates include Colletotrichum, Phoma, and Sclerotinia. Among bacteria, Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas share this distinction. The available reports on the application of viruses to controlling weeds are also reviewed. Focus is given to the phytotoxic mechanisms associated with bioherbicide candidates. Achieving consistent suppression of weeds in field conditions is a common challenge to this control strategy, as the efficacy of a bioherbicide candidate is generally more sensitive to environmental variation than a conventional herbicide. Common themes and lessons emerging from the available literature in regard to this challenge are presented. Additionally, future directions for this crop protection strategy are suggested. Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4551831/ /pubmed/26379687 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00659 Text en Copyright © 2015 Harding and Raizada. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Plant Science
Harding, Dylan P.
Raizada, Manish N.
Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
title Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
title_full Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
title_fullStr Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
title_full_unstemmed Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
title_short Controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
title_sort controlling weeds with fungi, bacteria and viruses: a review
topic Plant Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4551831/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26379687
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00659
work_keys_str_mv AT hardingdylanp controllingweedswithfungibacteriaandvirusesareview
AT raizadamanishn controllingweedswithfungibacteriaandvirusesareview