Cargando…

Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: Although the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) is 2-4 times higher in case of a positive family history, risk-adapted screening programs for family members related to CRC- patients do not exist in the German health care system. CRC screening recommendations for persons under 55 ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Siebenhofer, Andrea, Plath, Jasper, Taubenroth, Maja, Singer, Susanne, Hechtner, Marlene, Dahlhaus, Anne, Rauck, Sandra, Schulz-Rothe, Sylvia, Koné, Insa, Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26314581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1600-7
_version_ 1782387703471407104
author Siebenhofer, Andrea
Plath, Jasper
Taubenroth, Maja
Singer, Susanne
Hechtner, Marlene
Dahlhaus, Anne
Rauck, Sandra
Schulz-Rothe, Sylvia
Koné, Insa
Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
author_facet Siebenhofer, Andrea
Plath, Jasper
Taubenroth, Maja
Singer, Susanne
Hechtner, Marlene
Dahlhaus, Anne
Rauck, Sandra
Schulz-Rothe, Sylvia
Koné, Insa
Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
author_sort Siebenhofer, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) is 2-4 times higher in case of a positive family history, risk-adapted screening programs for family members related to CRC- patients do not exist in the German health care system. CRC screening recommendations for persons under 55 years of age that have a family predisposition have been published in several guidelines. The primary aim of this study is to determine the frequency of positive family history of CRC (1(st) degree relatives with CRC) among 40–54 year old persons in a general practitioner (GP) setting in Germany. Secondary aims are to detect the frequency of occurrence of colorectal neoplasms (CRC and advanced adenomas) in 1(st) degree relatives of CRC patients and to identify the variables (e.g. demographic, genetic, epigenetic and proteomic characteristics) that are associated with it. This study also explores whether evidence-based information contributes to informed decisions and how screening participation correlates with anxiety and (anticipated) regret. METHODS/DESIGN: Prior to the beginning of the study, the GP team (GP and one health care assistant) in around 50 practices will be trained, and about 8,750 persons that are registered with them will be asked to complete the “Network against colorectal cancer” questionnaire. The 10 % who are expected to have a positive family history will then be invited to give their informed consent to participate in the study. All individuals with positive family history will be provided with evidence-based information and prevention strategies. We plan to examine each participant’s family history of CRC in detail and to collect information on further variables (e.g. demographics) associated with increased risk. Additional stool and blood samples will be collected from study-participants who decide to undergo a colonoscopy (n ~ 350) and then analyzed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg to see whether further relevant variables are associated with an increased risk of CRC. One screening list and four questionnaires will be used to collect the data, and a detailed statistical analysis plan will be provided before the database is closed (expected to be June 30, 2015). DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that when persons with a family history of colorectal cancer have been provided with professional advice by the practice team, there will be an increase in the availability of valid information on the frequency of affected individuals and an increase in the number of persons making informed decisions. We also expect to identify further variables that are associated with colorectal cancer. This study therefore has translational relevance from lab to practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006277 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1600-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552264
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45522642015-08-29 Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study Siebenhofer, Andrea Plath, Jasper Taubenroth, Maja Singer, Susanne Hechtner, Marlene Dahlhaus, Anne Rauck, Sandra Schulz-Rothe, Sylvia Koné, Insa Gerlach, Ferdinand M. BMC Cancer Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Although the risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC) is 2-4 times higher in case of a positive family history, risk-adapted screening programs for family members related to CRC- patients do not exist in the German health care system. CRC screening recommendations for persons under 55 years of age that have a family predisposition have been published in several guidelines. The primary aim of this study is to determine the frequency of positive family history of CRC (1(st) degree relatives with CRC) among 40–54 year old persons in a general practitioner (GP) setting in Germany. Secondary aims are to detect the frequency of occurrence of colorectal neoplasms (CRC and advanced adenomas) in 1(st) degree relatives of CRC patients and to identify the variables (e.g. demographic, genetic, epigenetic and proteomic characteristics) that are associated with it. This study also explores whether evidence-based information contributes to informed decisions and how screening participation correlates with anxiety and (anticipated) regret. METHODS/DESIGN: Prior to the beginning of the study, the GP team (GP and one health care assistant) in around 50 practices will be trained, and about 8,750 persons that are registered with them will be asked to complete the “Network against colorectal cancer” questionnaire. The 10 % who are expected to have a positive family history will then be invited to give their informed consent to participate in the study. All individuals with positive family history will be provided with evidence-based information and prevention strategies. We plan to examine each participant’s family history of CRC in detail and to collect information on further variables (e.g. demographics) associated with increased risk. Additional stool and blood samples will be collected from study-participants who decide to undergo a colonoscopy (n ~ 350) and then analyzed at the German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Heidelberg to see whether further relevant variables are associated with an increased risk of CRC. One screening list and four questionnaires will be used to collect the data, and a detailed statistical analysis plan will be provided before the database is closed (expected to be June 30, 2015). DISCUSSION: It is anticipated that when persons with a family history of colorectal cancer have been provided with professional advice by the practice team, there will be an increase in the availability of valid information on the frequency of affected individuals and an increase in the number of persons making informed decisions. We also expect to identify further variables that are associated with colorectal cancer. This study therefore has translational relevance from lab to practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006277 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1600-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4552264/ /pubmed/26314581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1600-7 Text en © Siebenhofer et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Siebenhofer, Andrea
Plath, Jasper
Taubenroth, Maja
Singer, Susanne
Hechtner, Marlene
Dahlhaus, Anne
Rauck, Sandra
Schulz-Rothe, Sylvia
Koné, Insa
Gerlach, Ferdinand M.
Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
title Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
title_full Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
title_short Positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [FRIDA.Frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
title_sort positive family history of colorectal cancer in a general practice setting [frida.frankfurt]: study protocol of a of a cross-sectional study
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552264/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26314581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-1600-7
work_keys_str_mv AT siebenhoferandrea positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT plathjasper positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT taubenrothmaja positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT singersusanne positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT hechtnermarlene positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT dahlhausanne positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT raucksandra positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT schulzrothesylvia positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT koneinsa positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy
AT gerlachferdinandm positivefamilyhistoryofcolorectalcancerinageneralpracticesettingfridafrankfurtstudyprotocolofaofacrosssectionalstudy