Cargando…
The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism
The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (Eyes test) is an advanced test of theory of mind. Typical sex difference has been reported (i.e., female advantage). Individuals with autism show more difficulty than do typically developing individuals, yet it remains unclear how this is modulated by sex, as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136521 |
_version_ | 1782387716853334016 |
---|---|
author | Baron-Cohen, Simon Bowen, Daniel C. Holt, Rosemary J. Allison, Carrie Auyeung, Bonnie Lombardo, Michael V. Smith, Paula Lai, Meng-Chuan |
author_facet | Baron-Cohen, Simon Bowen, Daniel C. Holt, Rosemary J. Allison, Carrie Auyeung, Bonnie Lombardo, Michael V. Smith, Paula Lai, Meng-Chuan |
author_sort | Baron-Cohen, Simon |
collection | PubMed |
description | The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (Eyes test) is an advanced test of theory of mind. Typical sex difference has been reported (i.e., female advantage). Individuals with autism show more difficulty than do typically developing individuals, yet it remains unclear how this is modulated by sex, as females with autism have been under-represented. Here in a large, non-male-biased sample we test for the effects of sex, diagnosis, and their interaction. The Eyes test (revised version) was administered online to 395 adults with autism (178 males, 217 females) and 320 control adults (152 males, 168 females). Two-way ANOVA showed a significant sex-by-diagnosis interaction in total correct score (F(1,711) = 5.090, p = 0.024, η(p) (2) = 0.007) arising from a significant sex difference between control males and females (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.47), and an absence of a sex difference between males and females with autism (p = 0.907, d = 0.01); significant case-control differences were observed across sexes, with effect sizes of d = 0.35 in males and d = 0.69 in females. Group-difference patterns fit with the extreme-male-brain (EMB) theory predictions. Eyes test-Empathy Quotient and Eyes test-Autism Spectrum Quotient correlations were significant only in females with autism (r = 0.35, r = -0.32, respectively), but not in the other 3 groups. Support vector machine (SVM) classification based on response pattern across all 36 items classified autism diagnosis with a relatively higher accuracy for females (72.2%) than males (65.8%). Nevertheless, an SVM model trained within one sex generalized equally well when applied to the other sex. Performance on the Eyes test is a sex-independent phenotypic characteristic of adults with autism, reflecting sex-common social difficulties, and provides support for the EMB theory predictions for both males and females. Performance of females with autism differed from same-sex controls more than did that of males with autism. Females with autism also showed stronger coherence between self-reported dispositional traits and Eyes test performance than all other groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4552377 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45523772015-09-01 The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism Baron-Cohen, Simon Bowen, Daniel C. Holt, Rosemary J. Allison, Carrie Auyeung, Bonnie Lombardo, Michael V. Smith, Paula Lai, Meng-Chuan PLoS One Research Article The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test (Eyes test) is an advanced test of theory of mind. Typical sex difference has been reported (i.e., female advantage). Individuals with autism show more difficulty than do typically developing individuals, yet it remains unclear how this is modulated by sex, as females with autism have been under-represented. Here in a large, non-male-biased sample we test for the effects of sex, diagnosis, and their interaction. The Eyes test (revised version) was administered online to 395 adults with autism (178 males, 217 females) and 320 control adults (152 males, 168 females). Two-way ANOVA showed a significant sex-by-diagnosis interaction in total correct score (F(1,711) = 5.090, p = 0.024, η(p) (2) = 0.007) arising from a significant sex difference between control males and females (p < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.47), and an absence of a sex difference between males and females with autism (p = 0.907, d = 0.01); significant case-control differences were observed across sexes, with effect sizes of d = 0.35 in males and d = 0.69 in females. Group-difference patterns fit with the extreme-male-brain (EMB) theory predictions. Eyes test-Empathy Quotient and Eyes test-Autism Spectrum Quotient correlations were significant only in females with autism (r = 0.35, r = -0.32, respectively), but not in the other 3 groups. Support vector machine (SVM) classification based on response pattern across all 36 items classified autism diagnosis with a relatively higher accuracy for females (72.2%) than males (65.8%). Nevertheless, an SVM model trained within one sex generalized equally well when applied to the other sex. Performance on the Eyes test is a sex-independent phenotypic characteristic of adults with autism, reflecting sex-common social difficulties, and provides support for the EMB theory predictions for both males and females. Performance of females with autism differed from same-sex controls more than did that of males with autism. Females with autism also showed stronger coherence between self-reported dispositional traits and Eyes test performance than all other groups. Public Library of Science 2015-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4552377/ /pubmed/26313946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136521 Text en © 2015 Baron-Cohen et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baron-Cohen, Simon Bowen, Daniel C. Holt, Rosemary J. Allison, Carrie Auyeung, Bonnie Lombardo, Michael V. Smith, Paula Lai, Meng-Chuan The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism |
title | The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism |
title_full | The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism |
title_fullStr | The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism |
title_full_unstemmed | The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism |
title_short | The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: Complete Absence of Typical Sex Difference in ~400 Men and Women with Autism |
title_sort | “reading the mind in the eyes” test: complete absence of typical sex difference in ~400 men and women with autism |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552377/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26313946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136521 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baroncohensimon thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT bowendanielc thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT holtrosemaryj thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT allisoncarrie thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT auyeungbonnie thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT lombardomichaelv thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT smithpaula thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT laimengchuan thereadingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT baroncohensimon readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT bowendanielc readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT holtrosemaryj readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT allisoncarrie readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT auyeungbonnie readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT lombardomichaelv readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT smithpaula readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism AT laimengchuan readingthemindintheeyestestcompleteabsenceoftypicalsexdifferencein400menandwomenwithautism |