Cargando…

Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial

Gastric electrical stimulation with the implanted DIAMOND device has been shown to improve glycemic control and decrease weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. The objective of this study was to determine if device i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lebovitz, Harold E, Ludvik, Bernhard, Kozakowski, Jaroslaw, Tarnowski, Wieslaw, Zelewski, Mateusz, Yaniv, Irit, Schwartz, Tse’ela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177957
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12456
_version_ 1782387740615114752
author Lebovitz, Harold E
Ludvik, Bernhard
Kozakowski, Jaroslaw
Tarnowski, Wieslaw
Zelewski, Mateusz
Yaniv, Irit
Schwartz, Tse’ela
author_facet Lebovitz, Harold E
Ludvik, Bernhard
Kozakowski, Jaroslaw
Tarnowski, Wieslaw
Zelewski, Mateusz
Yaniv, Irit
Schwartz, Tse’ela
author_sort Lebovitz, Harold E
collection PubMed
description Gastric electrical stimulation with the implanted DIAMOND device has been shown to improve glycemic control and decrease weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. The objective of this study was to determine if device implantation alone (placebo effect) contributes to the long-term metabolic benefits of DIAMOND® meal-mediated gastric electrical stimulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study was a 48 week randomized, blinded, cross-over trial in university centers comparing glycemic improvement of DIAMOND® implanted patients with type 2 diabetic with no activation of the electrical stimulation (placebo) versus meal-mediated activation of the electrical signal. The endpoint was improvement in glycemic control (HbA1c) from baseline to 24 and 48 weeks. In period 1 (0–24 weeks), equal improvement in HbA1c occurred independent of whether the meal-mediated electrical stimulation was turned on or left off (HbA1c −0.80% and −0.85% [−8.8 and −9.0 mmol/mol]). The device placebo improvement proved to be transient as it was lost in period 2 (25–48 weeks). With electrical stimulation turned off, HbA1c returned toward baseline values (8.06 compared to 8.32%; 64.2 to 67.4 mmol/mol, P = 0.465). In contrast, turning the electrical stimulation on in period 2 sustained the decrease in HbA1c from baseline (−0.93%, −10.1mmol/mol, P = 0.001) observed in period 1. The results indicate that implantation of the DIAMOND device causes a transient improvement in HbA1c which is not sustained beyond 24 weeks. Meal-mediated electrical stimulation accounts for the significant improvement in HbA1c beyond 24 weeks.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552533
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45525332015-09-02 Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial Lebovitz, Harold E Ludvik, Bernhard Kozakowski, Jaroslaw Tarnowski, Wieslaw Zelewski, Mateusz Yaniv, Irit Schwartz, Tse’ela Physiol Rep Original Research Gastric electrical stimulation with the implanted DIAMOND device has been shown to improve glycemic control and decrease weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. The objective of this study was to determine if device implantation alone (placebo effect) contributes to the long-term metabolic benefits of DIAMOND® meal-mediated gastric electrical stimulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study was a 48 week randomized, blinded, cross-over trial in university centers comparing glycemic improvement of DIAMOND® implanted patients with type 2 diabetic with no activation of the electrical stimulation (placebo) versus meal-mediated activation of the electrical signal. The endpoint was improvement in glycemic control (HbA1c) from baseline to 24 and 48 weeks. In period 1 (0–24 weeks), equal improvement in HbA1c occurred independent of whether the meal-mediated electrical stimulation was turned on or left off (HbA1c −0.80% and −0.85% [−8.8 and −9.0 mmol/mol]). The device placebo improvement proved to be transient as it was lost in period 2 (25–48 weeks). With electrical stimulation turned off, HbA1c returned toward baseline values (8.06 compared to 8.32%; 64.2 to 67.4 mmol/mol, P = 0.465). In contrast, turning the electrical stimulation on in period 2 sustained the decrease in HbA1c from baseline (−0.93%, −10.1mmol/mol, P = 0.001) observed in period 1. The results indicate that implantation of the DIAMOND device causes a transient improvement in HbA1c which is not sustained beyond 24 weeks. Meal-mediated electrical stimulation accounts for the significant improvement in HbA1c beyond 24 weeks. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4552533/ /pubmed/26177957 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12456 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Lebovitz, Harold E
Ludvik, Bernhard
Kozakowski, Jaroslaw
Tarnowski, Wieslaw
Zelewski, Mateusz
Yaniv, Irit
Schwartz, Tse’ela
Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
title Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
title_full Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
title_fullStr Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
title_full_unstemmed Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
title_short Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
title_sort gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. a randomized blinded cross-over trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552533/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177957
http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12456
work_keys_str_mv AT lebovitzharolde gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial
AT ludvikbernhard gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial
AT kozakowskijaroslaw gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial
AT tarnowskiwieslaw gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial
AT zelewskimateusz gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial
AT yanivirit gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial
AT schwartztseela gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial