Cargando…
Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial
Gastric electrical stimulation with the implanted DIAMOND device has been shown to improve glycemic control and decrease weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. The objective of this study was to determine if device i...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177957 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12456 |
_version_ | 1782387740615114752 |
---|---|
author | Lebovitz, Harold E Ludvik, Bernhard Kozakowski, Jaroslaw Tarnowski, Wieslaw Zelewski, Mateusz Yaniv, Irit Schwartz, Tse’ela |
author_facet | Lebovitz, Harold E Ludvik, Bernhard Kozakowski, Jaroslaw Tarnowski, Wieslaw Zelewski, Mateusz Yaniv, Irit Schwartz, Tse’ela |
author_sort | Lebovitz, Harold E |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gastric electrical stimulation with the implanted DIAMOND device has been shown to improve glycemic control and decrease weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. The objective of this study was to determine if device implantation alone (placebo effect) contributes to the long-term metabolic benefits of DIAMOND® meal-mediated gastric electrical stimulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study was a 48 week randomized, blinded, cross-over trial in university centers comparing glycemic improvement of DIAMOND® implanted patients with type 2 diabetic with no activation of the electrical stimulation (placebo) versus meal-mediated activation of the electrical signal. The endpoint was improvement in glycemic control (HbA1c) from baseline to 24 and 48 weeks. In period 1 (0–24 weeks), equal improvement in HbA1c occurred independent of whether the meal-mediated electrical stimulation was turned on or left off (HbA1c −0.80% and −0.85% [−8.8 and −9.0 mmol/mol]). The device placebo improvement proved to be transient as it was lost in period 2 (25–48 weeks). With electrical stimulation turned off, HbA1c returned toward baseline values (8.06 compared to 8.32%; 64.2 to 67.4 mmol/mol, P = 0.465). In contrast, turning the electrical stimulation on in period 2 sustained the decrease in HbA1c from baseline (−0.93%, −10.1mmol/mol, P = 0.001) observed in period 1. The results indicate that implantation of the DIAMOND device causes a transient improvement in HbA1c which is not sustained beyond 24 weeks. Meal-mediated electrical stimulation accounts for the significant improvement in HbA1c beyond 24 weeks. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4552533 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45525332015-09-02 Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial Lebovitz, Harold E Ludvik, Bernhard Kozakowski, Jaroslaw Tarnowski, Wieslaw Zelewski, Mateusz Yaniv, Irit Schwartz, Tse’ela Physiol Rep Original Research Gastric electrical stimulation with the implanted DIAMOND device has been shown to improve glycemic control and decrease weight and systolic blood pressure in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents. The objective of this study was to determine if device implantation alone (placebo effect) contributes to the long-term metabolic benefits of DIAMOND® meal-mediated gastric electrical stimulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. The study was a 48 week randomized, blinded, cross-over trial in university centers comparing glycemic improvement of DIAMOND® implanted patients with type 2 diabetic with no activation of the electrical stimulation (placebo) versus meal-mediated activation of the electrical signal. The endpoint was improvement in glycemic control (HbA1c) from baseline to 24 and 48 weeks. In period 1 (0–24 weeks), equal improvement in HbA1c occurred independent of whether the meal-mediated electrical stimulation was turned on or left off (HbA1c −0.80% and −0.85% [−8.8 and −9.0 mmol/mol]). The device placebo improvement proved to be transient as it was lost in period 2 (25–48 weeks). With electrical stimulation turned off, HbA1c returned toward baseline values (8.06 compared to 8.32%; 64.2 to 67.4 mmol/mol, P = 0.465). In contrast, turning the electrical stimulation on in period 2 sustained the decrease in HbA1c from baseline (−0.93%, −10.1mmol/mol, P = 0.001) observed in period 1. The results indicate that implantation of the DIAMOND device causes a transient improvement in HbA1c which is not sustained beyond 24 weeks. Meal-mediated electrical stimulation accounts for the significant improvement in HbA1c beyond 24 weeks. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-07-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4552533/ /pubmed/26177957 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12456 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Physiological Reports published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of the American Physiological Society and The Physiological Society. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Lebovitz, Harold E Ludvik, Bernhard Kozakowski, Jaroslaw Tarnowski, Wieslaw Zelewski, Mateusz Yaniv, Irit Schwartz, Tse’ela Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial |
title | Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial |
title_full | Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial |
title_fullStr | Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial |
title_short | Gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. A randomized blinded cross-over trial |
title_sort | gastric electrical stimulation treatment of type 2 diabetes: effects of implantation versus meal-mediated stimulation. a randomized blinded cross-over trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552533/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177957 http://dx.doi.org/10.14814/phy2.12456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lebovitzharolde gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial AT ludvikbernhard gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial AT kozakowskijaroslaw gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial AT tarnowskiwieslaw gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial AT zelewskimateusz gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial AT yanivirit gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial AT schwartztseela gastricelectricalstimulationtreatmentoftype2diabeteseffectsofimplantationversusmealmediatedstimulationarandomizedblindedcrossovertrial |