Cargando…

Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke

Dual-task performance is often impaired after stroke. This may be resolved by enhancing patients’ automaticity of movement. This study sets out to test the constrained action hypothesis, which holds that automaticity of movement is enhanced by triggering an external focus (on movement effects), rath...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kal, E. C., van der Kamp, J., Houdijk, H., Groet, E., van Bennekom, C. A. M., Scherder, E. J. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136917
_version_ 1782387759998042112
author Kal, E. C.
van der Kamp, J.
Houdijk, H.
Groet, E.
van Bennekom, C. A. M.
Scherder, E. J. A.
author_facet Kal, E. C.
van der Kamp, J.
Houdijk, H.
Groet, E.
van Bennekom, C. A. M.
Scherder, E. J. A.
author_sort Kal, E. C.
collection PubMed
description Dual-task performance is often impaired after stroke. This may be resolved by enhancing patients’ automaticity of movement. This study sets out to test the constrained action hypothesis, which holds that automaticity of movement is enhanced by triggering an external focus (on movement effects), rather than an internal focus (on movement execution). Thirty-nine individuals with chronic, unilateral stroke performed a one-leg-stepping task with both legs in single- and dual-task conditions. Attentional focus was manipulated with instructions. Motor performance (movement speed), movement automaticity (fluency of movement), and dual-task performance (dual-task costs) were assessed. The effects of focus on movement speed, single- and dual-task movement fluency, and dual-task costs were analysed with generalized estimating equations. Results showed that, overall, single-task performance was unaffected by focus (p = .341). Regarding movement fluency, no main effects of focus were found in single- or dual-task conditions (p’s ≥ .13). However, focus by leg interactions suggested that an external focus reduced movement fluency of the paretic leg compared to an internal focus (single-task conditions: p = .068; dual-task conditions: p = .084). An external focus also tended to result in inferior dual-task performance (β = -2.38, p = .065). Finally, a near-significant interaction (β = 2.36, p = .055) suggested that dual-task performance was more constrained by patients’ attentional capacity in external focus conditions. We conclude that, compared to an internal focus, an external focus did not result in more automated movements in chronic stroke patients. Contrary to expectations, trends were found for enhanced automaticity with an internal focus. These findings might be due to patients’ strong preference to use an internal focus in daily life. Future work needs to establish the more permanent effects of learning with different attentional foci on re-automating motor control after stroke.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45526552015-09-10 Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke Kal, E. C. van der Kamp, J. Houdijk, H. Groet, E. van Bennekom, C. A. M. Scherder, E. J. A. PLoS One Research Article Dual-task performance is often impaired after stroke. This may be resolved by enhancing patients’ automaticity of movement. This study sets out to test the constrained action hypothesis, which holds that automaticity of movement is enhanced by triggering an external focus (on movement effects), rather than an internal focus (on movement execution). Thirty-nine individuals with chronic, unilateral stroke performed a one-leg-stepping task with both legs in single- and dual-task conditions. Attentional focus was manipulated with instructions. Motor performance (movement speed), movement automaticity (fluency of movement), and dual-task performance (dual-task costs) were assessed. The effects of focus on movement speed, single- and dual-task movement fluency, and dual-task costs were analysed with generalized estimating equations. Results showed that, overall, single-task performance was unaffected by focus (p = .341). Regarding movement fluency, no main effects of focus were found in single- or dual-task conditions (p’s ≥ .13). However, focus by leg interactions suggested that an external focus reduced movement fluency of the paretic leg compared to an internal focus (single-task conditions: p = .068; dual-task conditions: p = .084). An external focus also tended to result in inferior dual-task performance (β = -2.38, p = .065). Finally, a near-significant interaction (β = 2.36, p = .055) suggested that dual-task performance was more constrained by patients’ attentional capacity in external focus conditions. We conclude that, compared to an internal focus, an external focus did not result in more automated movements in chronic stroke patients. Contrary to expectations, trends were found for enhanced automaticity with an internal focus. These findings might be due to patients’ strong preference to use an internal focus in daily life. Future work needs to establish the more permanent effects of learning with different attentional foci on re-automating motor control after stroke. Public Library of Science 2015-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4552655/ /pubmed/26317437 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136917 Text en © 2015 Kal et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kal, E. C.
van der Kamp, J.
Houdijk, H.
Groet, E.
van Bennekom, C. A. M.
Scherder, E. J. A.
Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke
title Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke
title_full Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke
title_fullStr Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke
title_full_unstemmed Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke
title_short Stay Focused! The Effects of Internal and External Focus of Attention on Movement Automaticity in Patients with Stroke
title_sort stay focused! the effects of internal and external focus of attention on movement automaticity in patients with stroke
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317437
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136917
work_keys_str_mv AT kalec stayfocusedtheeffectsofinternalandexternalfocusofattentiononmovementautomaticityinpatientswithstroke
AT vanderkampj stayfocusedtheeffectsofinternalandexternalfocusofattentiononmovementautomaticityinpatientswithstroke
AT houdijkh stayfocusedtheeffectsofinternalandexternalfocusofattentiononmovementautomaticityinpatientswithstroke
AT groete stayfocusedtheeffectsofinternalandexternalfocusofattentiononmovementautomaticityinpatientswithstroke
AT vanbennekomcam stayfocusedtheeffectsofinternalandexternalfocusofattentiononmovementautomaticityinpatientswithstroke
AT scherdereja stayfocusedtheeffectsofinternalandexternalfocusofattentiononmovementautomaticityinpatientswithstroke