Cargando…
Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement
BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses (MAs) provide the highest possible level of evidence. However, poor conduct or reporting of SRs and MAs may reduce their utility. The PRISMA Statement (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) was developed to help aut...
Autores principales: | Peters, Jeroen P. M., Hooft, Lotty, Grolman, Wilko, Stegeman, Inge |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26317406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0136540 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Assessment of the Quality of Reporting of Randomised Controlled Trials in Otorhinolaryngologic Literature – Adherence to the CONSORT Statement
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Quality of reporting of otorhinolaryngology articles using animal models with the ARRIVE statement
por: Bezdjian, Aren, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
The risk of bias in randomized controlled trials in otorhinolaryngology: hardly any improvement since 1950
por: Peters, Jeroen P. M., et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement
por: Hendriksma, Martine, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Quality of reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in emergency medicine based on the PRISMA statement
por: Nawijn, Femke, et al.
Publicado: (2019)