Cargando…

Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the accuracy and validity of the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) as a tool to identify and manage in a timely manner the deteriorating patient with severe sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in five sites of adult patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chamberlain, Diane J, Willis, Eileen, Clark, Robyn, Brideson, Genevieve
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25504659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-203937
_version_ 1782387808637288448
author Chamberlain, Diane J
Willis, Eileen
Clark, Robyn
Brideson, Genevieve
author_facet Chamberlain, Diane J
Willis, Eileen
Clark, Robyn
Brideson, Genevieve
author_sort Chamberlain, Diane J
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the accuracy and validity of the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) as a tool to identify and manage in a timely manner the deteriorating patient with severe sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in five sites of adult patients. Keywords and physiological vital signs data from triage documentation were analysed for the ‘identified’ status compared with confirmed diagnosis of severe sepsis after admission to the intensive care unit. The primary outcome is the accuracy and validity of the ATS Triage scale categories to identify a prespecified severe sepsis population at triage. Secondary outcome measures included time compliance, antimicrobial administration and mortality prediction. Statistical analysis included parameters of diagnostic performance. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to mortality prediction. RESULTS: Of 1022 patients meeting the criteria for severe sepsis, 995 were triaged through the emergency department, 164 with shock. Only 53% (n=534) were identified at triage. The overall sensitivity of the ATS to identify severe sepsis was 71%. ATS 3 was the most accurate (likelihood ratio positive, 2.45, positive predictive value 0.73) and ATS 2 the most valid (area under the curve 0.567) category. Identified cases were more likely to survive (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.697 to 0.94, p<0.007). The strongest bias-adjusted predictors of mortality were circulatory compromise variable (1.78, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.41, p<0.001), lactate >4 (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.89, p<0.001) and ATS 1 category (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.35, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The ATS and its categories is a sensitive and moderately accurate and valid tool for identifying severe sepsis in a predetermined group, but lacks clinical efficacy and safety without further education or quality improvement strategies targeted to the identification of severe sepsis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552895
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45528952015-09-02 Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale Chamberlain, Diane J Willis, Eileen Clark, Robyn Brideson, Genevieve Emerg Med J Original Article OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the accuracy and validity of the Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) as a tool to identify and manage in a timely manner the deteriorating patient with severe sepsis. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study conducted in five sites of adult patients. Keywords and physiological vital signs data from triage documentation were analysed for the ‘identified’ status compared with confirmed diagnosis of severe sepsis after admission to the intensive care unit. The primary outcome is the accuracy and validity of the ATS Triage scale categories to identify a prespecified severe sepsis population at triage. Secondary outcome measures included time compliance, antimicrobial administration and mortality prediction. Statistical analysis included parameters of diagnostic performance. Adjusted multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to mortality prediction. RESULTS: Of 1022 patients meeting the criteria for severe sepsis, 995 were triaged through the emergency department, 164 with shock. Only 53% (n=534) were identified at triage. The overall sensitivity of the ATS to identify severe sepsis was 71%. ATS 3 was the most accurate (likelihood ratio positive, 2.45, positive predictive value 0.73) and ATS 2 the most valid (area under the curve 0.567) category. Identified cases were more likely to survive (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.697 to 0.94, p<0.007). The strongest bias-adjusted predictors of mortality were circulatory compromise variable (1.78, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.41, p<0.001), lactate >4 (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.89, p<0.001) and ATS 1 category (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.35, p<0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The ATS and its categories is a sensitive and moderately accurate and valid tool for identifying severe sepsis in a predetermined group, but lacks clinical efficacy and safety without further education or quality improvement strategies targeted to the identification of severe sepsis. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09 2014-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC4552895/ /pubmed/25504659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-203937 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Chamberlain, Diane J
Willis, Eileen
Clark, Robyn
Brideson, Genevieve
Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale
title Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale
title_full Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale
title_fullStr Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale
title_short Identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the Australasian Triage Scale
title_sort identification of the severe sepsis patient at triage: a prospective analysis of the australasian triage scale
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552895/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25504659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2014-203937
work_keys_str_mv AT chamberlaindianej identificationoftheseveresepsispatientattriageaprospectiveanalysisoftheaustralasiantriagescale
AT williseileen identificationoftheseveresepsispatientattriageaprospectiveanalysisoftheaustralasiantriagescale
AT clarkrobyn identificationoftheseveresepsispatientattriageaprospectiveanalysisoftheaustralasiantriagescale
AT bridesongenevieve identificationoftheseveresepsispatientattriageaprospectiveanalysisoftheaustralasiantriagescale