Cargando…

Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy associated with Down syndrome (DS) compared with other congenital anomalies screened for during pregnancy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective population-based registry study (East Midlands & South Yorkshire in England)....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Budd, Judith L S, Draper, Elizabeth S, Lotto, Robyn R, Berry, Laura E, Smith, Lucy K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26071456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306985
_version_ 1782387815677427712
author Budd, Judith L S
Draper, Elizabeth S
Lotto, Robyn R
Berry, Laura E
Smith, Lucy K
author_facet Budd, Judith L S
Draper, Elizabeth S
Lotto, Robyn R
Berry, Laura E
Smith, Lucy K
author_sort Budd, Judith L S
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy associated with Down syndrome (DS) compared with other congenital anomalies screened for during pregnancy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective population-based registry study (East Midlands & South Yorkshire in England). PARTICIPANTS: All registered cases of DS and nine selected congenital anomalies with poor prognostic outcome (the UK Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP)9) with an end of pregnancy date between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007. Main outcome measures: Poisson regression models were used to explore outcome measures, including socioeconomic variation in rates of anomaly; antenatal detection; pregnancy outcome; live birth incidence and neonatal mortality. Deprivation was measured using the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 at super output area level. RESULTS: There were 1151 cases of DS and 1572 cases of the nine severe anomalies combined. The overall rate of antenatal detection was 57% for DS, which decreased with increasing deprivation (rate ratio comparing the most deprived tenth with the least deprived: 0.76 (0.60 to 0.97)). Antenatal detection rates were considerably higher for FASP9 anomalies (86%), with no evidence of a trend with deprivation (0.99 95% CI (0.84 to 1.17)). The termination of pregnancy rate following antenatal diagnosis was higher for DS (86%) than the FASP9 anomalies (70%). Both groups showed wide socioeconomic variation in the termination of pregnancy rate (rate ratio: DS: 0.76 (0.58 to 0.99); FASP9 anomalies: 0.80 (0.65 to 0.97)). Consequently, socioeconomic inequalities in live birth and neonatal mortality rates associated with these anomalies arise that were not observed in utero. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities exist in the antenatal detection of DS, and subsequent termination rates are much higher for DS than other anomalies. Termination rates for all anomalies are lower in more deprived areas leading to wide socioeconomic inequalities in live born infants with a congenital anomaly, particularly DS, and subsequent neonatal mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552926
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45529262015-09-02 Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study Budd, Judith L S Draper, Elizabeth S Lotto, Robyn R Berry, Laura E Smith, Lucy K Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed Original Article OBJECTIVE: To investigate socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy associated with Down syndrome (DS) compared with other congenital anomalies screened for during pregnancy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective population-based registry study (East Midlands & South Yorkshire in England). PARTICIPANTS: All registered cases of DS and nine selected congenital anomalies with poor prognostic outcome (the UK Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme (FASP)9) with an end of pregnancy date between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2007. Main outcome measures: Poisson regression models were used to explore outcome measures, including socioeconomic variation in rates of anomaly; antenatal detection; pregnancy outcome; live birth incidence and neonatal mortality. Deprivation was measured using the Index of Multiple Deprivation 2004 at super output area level. RESULTS: There were 1151 cases of DS and 1572 cases of the nine severe anomalies combined. The overall rate of antenatal detection was 57% for DS, which decreased with increasing deprivation (rate ratio comparing the most deprived tenth with the least deprived: 0.76 (0.60 to 0.97)). Antenatal detection rates were considerably higher for FASP9 anomalies (86%), with no evidence of a trend with deprivation (0.99 95% CI (0.84 to 1.17)). The termination of pregnancy rate following antenatal diagnosis was higher for DS (86%) than the FASP9 anomalies (70%). Both groups showed wide socioeconomic variation in the termination of pregnancy rate (rate ratio: DS: 0.76 (0.58 to 0.99); FASP9 anomalies: 0.80 (0.65 to 0.97)). Consequently, socioeconomic inequalities in live birth and neonatal mortality rates associated with these anomalies arise that were not observed in utero. CONCLUSIONS: Socioeconomic inequalities exist in the antenatal detection of DS, and subsequent termination rates are much higher for DS than other anomalies. Termination rates for all anomalies are lower in more deprived areas leading to wide socioeconomic inequalities in live born infants with a congenital anomaly, particularly DS, and subsequent neonatal mortality. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-09 2015-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4552926/ /pubmed/26071456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306985 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Budd, Judith L S
Draper, Elizabeth S
Lotto, Robyn R
Berry, Laura E
Smith, Lucy K
Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study
title Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study
title_full Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study
title_fullStr Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study
title_short Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with down syndrome: a population-based study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552926/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26071456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2014-306985
work_keys_str_mv AT buddjudithls socioeconomicinequalitiesinpregnancyoutcomeassociatedwithdownsyndromeapopulationbasedstudy
AT draperelizabeths socioeconomicinequalitiesinpregnancyoutcomeassociatedwithdownsyndromeapopulationbasedstudy
AT lottorobynr socioeconomicinequalitiesinpregnancyoutcomeassociatedwithdownsyndromeapopulationbasedstudy
AT berrylaurae socioeconomicinequalitiesinpregnancyoutcomeassociatedwithdownsyndromeapopulationbasedstudy
AT smithlucyk socioeconomicinequalitiesinpregnancyoutcomeassociatedwithdownsyndromeapopulationbasedstudy