Cargando…

Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians

Access to the most up-to-date evidence is an important cornerstone for veterinarians attempting to practice in an evidence-based manner; therefore, an understanding of what and how information is accessed is vital. The aim of this study was to identify what resources the UK veterinary profession acc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nielsen, T. D., Dean, R. S., Massey, A., Brennan, M. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.103068
_version_ 1782387816797306880
author Nielsen, T. D.
Dean, R. S.
Massey, A.
Brennan, M. L.
author_facet Nielsen, T. D.
Dean, R. S.
Massey, A.
Brennan, M. L.
author_sort Nielsen, T. D.
collection PubMed
description Access to the most up-to-date evidence is an important cornerstone for veterinarians attempting to practice in an evidence-based manner; therefore, an understanding of what and how information is accessed is vital. The aim of this study was to identify what resources the UK veterinary profession access and regard as most useful. Based on questionnaires received from veterinarians, the Veterinary Times was nominated as most often read journal or magazine by respondents (n=3572, 79 per cent). In Practice (n=3224, 82 per cent) and the Veterinary Record (n=165, 34 per cent) were seen as most useful by clinicians, and non-clinicians, respectively. Google was the most often nominated electronic resource by all respondents (n=3076, 71 per cent), with Google (n=459, 23 per cent) and PubMed (n=60, 17 per cent) seen as most useful by clinicians and non-clinicians, respectively. The abstract and conclusion sections were the most read parts of scientific manuscripts nominated by all respondents. When looking for assistance with difficult cases, colleagues were the common information choice for clinicians. Different sections of the veterinary profession access information, and deem resources useful, in different ways. Access to good quality evidence is important for the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine, and therefore, researchers should think about disseminating their findings in a targeted way for optimal use by the profession.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4552931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45529312015-09-02 Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians Nielsen, T. D. Dean, R. S. Massey, A. Brennan, M. L. Vet Rec Research Access to the most up-to-date evidence is an important cornerstone for veterinarians attempting to practice in an evidence-based manner; therefore, an understanding of what and how information is accessed is vital. The aim of this study was to identify what resources the UK veterinary profession access and regard as most useful. Based on questionnaires received from veterinarians, the Veterinary Times was nominated as most often read journal or magazine by respondents (n=3572, 79 per cent). In Practice (n=3224, 82 per cent) and the Veterinary Record (n=165, 34 per cent) were seen as most useful by clinicians, and non-clinicians, respectively. Google was the most often nominated electronic resource by all respondents (n=3076, 71 per cent), with Google (n=459, 23 per cent) and PubMed (n=60, 17 per cent) seen as most useful by clinicians and non-clinicians, respectively. The abstract and conclusion sections were the most read parts of scientific manuscripts nominated by all respondents. When looking for assistance with difficult cases, colleagues were the common information choice for clinicians. Different sections of the veterinary profession access information, and deem resources useful, in different ways. Access to good quality evidence is important for the practice of evidence-based veterinary medicine, and therefore, researchers should think about disseminating their findings in a targeted way for optimal use by the profession. BMJ Publishing Group 2015-08-15 2015-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4552931/ /pubmed/26246397 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.103068 Text en British Veterinary Association This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Nielsen, T. D.
Dean, R. S.
Massey, A.
Brennan, M. L.
Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
title Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
title_full Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
title_fullStr Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
title_full_unstemmed Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
title_short Survey of the UK veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
title_sort survey of the uk veterinary profession 2: sources of information used by veterinarians
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26246397
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/vr.103068
work_keys_str_mv AT nielsentd surveyoftheukveterinaryprofession2sourcesofinformationusedbyveterinarians
AT deanrs surveyoftheukveterinaryprofession2sourcesofinformationusedbyveterinarians
AT masseya surveyoftheukveterinaryprofession2sourcesofinformationusedbyveterinarians
AT brennanml surveyoftheukveterinaryprofession2sourcesofinformationusedbyveterinarians