Cargando…
Defining the null hypothesis
Virus B is a newly emerged viral strain for which there is no current treatment. Drug A was identified as a potential treatment for infection with virus B. In this pre-clinical phase of drug testing, the effects of drug A on survival after infection with virus B was tested. There was no difference i...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26319022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0181-x |
_version_ | 1782387829047820288 |
---|---|
author | Saxon, Emma |
author_facet | Saxon, Emma |
author_sort | Saxon, Emma |
collection | PubMed |
description | Virus B is a newly emerged viral strain for which there is no current treatment. Drug A was identified as a potential treatment for infection with virus B. In this pre-clinical phase of drug testing, the effects of drug A on survival after infection with virus B was tested. There was no difference in survival between control (dark blue) and drug A-treated, virus B-infected mice (green), but a significant difference in survival between control and virus B-infected mice without drug treatment (light blue, z-test for proportions P < 0.05, n = 30 in each group). The authors therefore concluded that drug A is effective in reducing mouse mortality due to virus B. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4552992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45529922015-08-30 Defining the null hypothesis Saxon, Emma BMC Biol Comment Virus B is a newly emerged viral strain for which there is no current treatment. Drug A was identified as a potential treatment for infection with virus B. In this pre-clinical phase of drug testing, the effects of drug A on survival after infection with virus B was tested. There was no difference in survival between control (dark blue) and drug A-treated, virus B-infected mice (green), but a significant difference in survival between control and virus B-infected mice without drug treatment (light blue, z-test for proportions P < 0.05, n = 30 in each group). The authors therefore concluded that drug A is effective in reducing mouse mortality due to virus B. BioMed Central 2015-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4552992/ /pubmed/26319022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0181-x Text en © Saxon. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Comment Saxon, Emma Defining the null hypothesis |
title | Defining the null hypothesis |
title_full | Defining the null hypothesis |
title_fullStr | Defining the null hypothesis |
title_full_unstemmed | Defining the null hypothesis |
title_short | Defining the null hypothesis |
title_sort | defining the null hypothesis |
topic | Comment |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4552992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26319022 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-015-0181-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saxonemma definingthenullhypothesis |