Cargando…

Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications

Study Design. Quasiexperimental study. Objective. To investigate whether radiofrequency treatment can preclude the need for spinal surgery in both the short term and long term. Background. Radiofrequency is commonly used to treat lumbosacral radicular pain. Only few studies have evaluated its effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trinidad, José Manuel, Carnota, Ana Isabel, Failde, Inmaculada, Torres, Luis Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/392856
_version_ 1782387845115150336
author Trinidad, José Manuel
Carnota, Ana Isabel
Failde, Inmaculada
Torres, Luis Miguel
author_facet Trinidad, José Manuel
Carnota, Ana Isabel
Failde, Inmaculada
Torres, Luis Miguel
author_sort Trinidad, José Manuel
collection PubMed
description Study Design. Quasiexperimental study. Objective. To investigate whether radiofrequency treatment can preclude the need for spinal surgery in both the short term and long term. Background. Radiofrequency is commonly used to treat lumbosacral radicular pain. Only few studies have evaluated its effects on surgical indications. Methods. We conducted a quasiexperimental study of 43 patients who had been scheduled for spinal surgery. Radiofrequency was indicated for 25 patients. The primary endpoint was the decision of the patient to reject spinal surgery 1 month and 1 year after treatment (pulsed radiofrequency of dorsal root ganglion, 76%; conventional radiofrequency of the medial branch, 12%; combined technique, 12%). The primary endpoint was the decision of the patient to reject spinal surgery 1 month and 1 year after treatment. In addition, we also evaluated adverse effects, ODI, NRS. Results. We observed after treatment with radiofrequency 80% of patients rejected spinal surgery in the short term and 76% in the long term. We conclude that radiofrequency is a useful treatment strategy that can achieve very similar outcomes to spinal surgery. Patients also reported a very high level of satisfaction (84% satisfied/very satisfied). We also found that optimization of the electrical parameters of the radiofrequency improved the outcome of this technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4553181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45531812015-09-08 Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications Trinidad, José Manuel Carnota, Ana Isabel Failde, Inmaculada Torres, Luis Miguel Pain Res Treat Clinical Study Study Design. Quasiexperimental study. Objective. To investigate whether radiofrequency treatment can preclude the need for spinal surgery in both the short term and long term. Background. Radiofrequency is commonly used to treat lumbosacral radicular pain. Only few studies have evaluated its effects on surgical indications. Methods. We conducted a quasiexperimental study of 43 patients who had been scheduled for spinal surgery. Radiofrequency was indicated for 25 patients. The primary endpoint was the decision of the patient to reject spinal surgery 1 month and 1 year after treatment (pulsed radiofrequency of dorsal root ganglion, 76%; conventional radiofrequency of the medial branch, 12%; combined technique, 12%). The primary endpoint was the decision of the patient to reject spinal surgery 1 month and 1 year after treatment. In addition, we also evaluated adverse effects, ODI, NRS. Results. We observed after treatment with radiofrequency 80% of patients rejected spinal surgery in the short term and 76% in the long term. We conclude that radiofrequency is a useful treatment strategy that can achieve very similar outcomes to spinal surgery. Patients also reported a very high level of satisfaction (84% satisfied/very satisfied). We also found that optimization of the electrical parameters of the radiofrequency improved the outcome of this technique. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2015 2015-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4553181/ /pubmed/26351581 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/392856 Text en Copyright © 2015 José Manuel Trinidad et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Trinidad, José Manuel
Carnota, Ana Isabel
Failde, Inmaculada
Torres, Luis Miguel
Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications
title Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications
title_full Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications
title_fullStr Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications
title_full_unstemmed Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications
title_short Radiofrequency for the Treatment of Lumbar Radicular Pain: Impact on Surgical Indications
title_sort radiofrequency for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain: impact on surgical indications
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26351581
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/392856
work_keys_str_mv AT trinidadjosemanuel radiofrequencyforthetreatmentoflumbarradicularpainimpactonsurgicalindications
AT carnotaanaisabel radiofrequencyforthetreatmentoflumbarradicularpainimpactonsurgicalindications
AT faildeinmaculada radiofrequencyforthetreatmentoflumbarradicularpainimpactonsurgicalindications
AT torresluismiguel radiofrequencyforthetreatmentoflumbarradicularpainimpactonsurgicalindications