Cargando…

Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a promising tool for bone and tissue regeneration. However, prolonged healing time remains a major problem. Various materials including cells, cytokines, and growth factors have been used in an attempt to enhance bone formation. We examined the effect of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Ji-Beom, Lee, Dong Yeon, Seo, Sang Gyo, Kim, Eo Jin, Kim, Ji Hye, Yoo, Won Joon, Cho, Tae-Joon, Choi, In Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330963
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.383
_version_ 1782387861096497152
author Kim, Ji-Beom
Lee, Dong Yeon
Seo, Sang Gyo
Kim, Eo Jin
Kim, Ji Hye
Yoo, Won Joon
Cho, Tae-Joon
Choi, In Ho
author_facet Kim, Ji-Beom
Lee, Dong Yeon
Seo, Sang Gyo
Kim, Eo Jin
Kim, Ji Hye
Yoo, Won Joon
Cho, Tae-Joon
Choi, In Ho
author_sort Kim, Ji-Beom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a promising tool for bone and tissue regeneration. However, prolonged healing time remains a major problem. Various materials including cells, cytokines, and growth factors have been used in an attempt to enhance bone formation. We examined the effect of percutaneous injection of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) during the consolidation phase on bone regeneration after distraction. METHODS: The immature rabbit tibial DO model (20 mm length-gain) was used. Twenty-eight animals received DBM 100 mg percutaneously at the end of distraction. Another 22 animals were left without further procedure (control). Plain radiographs were taken every week. Postmortem bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) studies were performed at the third and sixth weeks of the consolidation period and histological analysis was performed. RESULTS: The regenerate bone mineral density was higher in the DBM group when compared with that in the saline injection control group at the third week postdistraction. Quantitative analysis using micro-CT revealed larger trabecular bone volume, higher trabecular number, and less trabecular separation in the DBM group than in the saline injection control group. Cross-sectional area and cortical thickness at the sixth week postdistraction, assessed using micro-CT, were greater in the regenerates of the DBM group compared with the control group. Histological evaluation revealed higher trabecular bone volume and trabecular number in the regenerate of the DBM group. New bone formation was apparently enhanced, via endochondral ossification, at the site and in the vicinity of the injected DBM. DBM was absorbed slowly, but it remained until the sixth postoperative week after injection. CONCLUSIONS: DBM administration into the distraction gap at the end of the distraction period resulted in a significantly greater regenerate bone area, trabecular number, and cortical thickness in the rabbit tibial DO model. These data suggest that percutaneous DBM administration at the end of the distraction period or in the early consolidation period may stimulate regenerate bone formation and consolidation in a clinical situation with delayed bone healing during DO.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4553289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Orthopaedic Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45532892015-09-01 Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation Kim, Ji-Beom Lee, Dong Yeon Seo, Sang Gyo Kim, Eo Jin Kim, Ji Hye Yoo, Won Joon Cho, Tae-Joon Choi, In Ho Clin Orthop Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) is a promising tool for bone and tissue regeneration. However, prolonged healing time remains a major problem. Various materials including cells, cytokines, and growth factors have been used in an attempt to enhance bone formation. We examined the effect of percutaneous injection of demineralized bone matrix (DBM) during the consolidation phase on bone regeneration after distraction. METHODS: The immature rabbit tibial DO model (20 mm length-gain) was used. Twenty-eight animals received DBM 100 mg percutaneously at the end of distraction. Another 22 animals were left without further procedure (control). Plain radiographs were taken every week. Postmortem bone dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) studies were performed at the third and sixth weeks of the consolidation period and histological analysis was performed. RESULTS: The regenerate bone mineral density was higher in the DBM group when compared with that in the saline injection control group at the third week postdistraction. Quantitative analysis using micro-CT revealed larger trabecular bone volume, higher trabecular number, and less trabecular separation in the DBM group than in the saline injection control group. Cross-sectional area and cortical thickness at the sixth week postdistraction, assessed using micro-CT, were greater in the regenerates of the DBM group compared with the control group. Histological evaluation revealed higher trabecular bone volume and trabecular number in the regenerate of the DBM group. New bone formation was apparently enhanced, via endochondral ossification, at the site and in the vicinity of the injected DBM. DBM was absorbed slowly, but it remained until the sixth postoperative week after injection. CONCLUSIONS: DBM administration into the distraction gap at the end of the distraction period resulted in a significantly greater regenerate bone area, trabecular number, and cortical thickness in the rabbit tibial DO model. These data suggest that percutaneous DBM administration at the end of the distraction period or in the early consolidation period may stimulate regenerate bone formation and consolidation in a clinical situation with delayed bone healing during DO. The Korean Orthopaedic Association 2015-09 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4553289/ /pubmed/26330963 http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.383 Text en Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Ji-Beom
Lee, Dong Yeon
Seo, Sang Gyo
Kim, Eo Jin
Kim, Ji Hye
Yoo, Won Joon
Cho, Tae-Joon
Choi, In Ho
Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation
title Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation
title_full Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation
title_fullStr Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation
title_full_unstemmed Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation
title_short Demineralized Bone Matrix Injection in Consolidation Phase Enhances Bone Regeneration in Distraction Osteogenesis via Endochondral Bone Formation
title_sort demineralized bone matrix injection in consolidation phase enhances bone regeneration in distraction osteogenesis via endochondral bone formation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26330963
http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios.2015.7.3.383
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjibeom demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT leedongyeon demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT seosanggyo demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT kimeojin demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT kimjihye demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT yoowonjoon demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT chotaejoon demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation
AT choiinho demineralizedbonematrixinjectioninconsolidationphaseenhancesboneregenerationindistractionosteogenesisviaendochondralboneformation