Cargando…

Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa

Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a leading complement and alternative to synthetic pesticides and a form of sustainable intensification with particular importance for tropical smallholders. Global pesticide use has grown over the past 20 years to 3.5 billion kg/year, amounting to a global market...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pretty, Jules, Pervez Bharucha, Zareen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26463073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects6010152
_version_ 1782387912691679232
author Pretty, Jules
Pervez Bharucha, Zareen
author_facet Pretty, Jules
Pervez Bharucha, Zareen
author_sort Pretty, Jules
collection PubMed
description Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a leading complement and alternative to synthetic pesticides and a form of sustainable intensification with particular importance for tropical smallholders. Global pesticide use has grown over the past 20 years to 3.5 billion kg/year, amounting to a global market worth $45 billion. The external costs of pesticides are $4–$19 (€3–15) per kg of active ingredient applied, suggesting that IPM approaches that result in lower pesticide use will benefit, not only farmers, but also wider environments and human health. Evidence for IPM’s impacts on pesticide use and yields remains patchy. We contribute an evaluation using data from 85 IPM projects from 24 countries of Asia and Africa implemented over the past twenty years. Analysing outcomes on productivity and reliance on pesticides, we find a mean yield increase across projects and crops of 40.9% (SD 72.3), combined with a decline in pesticide use to 30.7% (SD 34.9) compared with baseline. A total of 35 of 115 (30%) crop combinations resulted in a transition to zero pesticide use. We assess successes in four types of IPM projects, and find that at least 50% of pesticide use is not needed in most agroecosystems. Nonetheless, policy support for IPM is relatively rare, counter-interventions from pesticide industry common, and the IPM challenge never done as pests, diseases and weeds evolve and move.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4553536
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45535362015-10-08 Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa Pretty, Jules Pervez Bharucha, Zareen Insects Article Integrated Pest Management (IPM) is a leading complement and alternative to synthetic pesticides and a form of sustainable intensification with particular importance for tropical smallholders. Global pesticide use has grown over the past 20 years to 3.5 billion kg/year, amounting to a global market worth $45 billion. The external costs of pesticides are $4–$19 (€3–15) per kg of active ingredient applied, suggesting that IPM approaches that result in lower pesticide use will benefit, not only farmers, but also wider environments and human health. Evidence for IPM’s impacts on pesticide use and yields remains patchy. We contribute an evaluation using data from 85 IPM projects from 24 countries of Asia and Africa implemented over the past twenty years. Analysing outcomes on productivity and reliance on pesticides, we find a mean yield increase across projects and crops of 40.9% (SD 72.3), combined with a decline in pesticide use to 30.7% (SD 34.9) compared with baseline. A total of 35 of 115 (30%) crop combinations resulted in a transition to zero pesticide use. We assess successes in four types of IPM projects, and find that at least 50% of pesticide use is not needed in most agroecosystems. Nonetheless, policy support for IPM is relatively rare, counter-interventions from pesticide industry common, and the IPM challenge never done as pests, diseases and weeds evolve and move. MDPI 2015-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4553536/ /pubmed/26463073 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects6010152 Text en © 2015 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pretty, Jules
Pervez Bharucha, Zareen
Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
title Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
title_full Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
title_fullStr Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
title_full_unstemmed Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
title_short Integrated Pest Management for Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture in Asia and Africa
title_sort integrated pest management for sustainable intensification of agriculture in asia and africa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553536/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26463073
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects6010152
work_keys_str_mv AT prettyjules integratedpestmanagementforsustainableintensificationofagricultureinasiaandafrica
AT pervezbharuchazareen integratedpestmanagementforsustainableintensificationofagricultureinasiaandafrica