Cargando…

Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)

In Giant Honey Bees, abdomen flipping happens in a variety of contexts. It can be either synchronous or cascaded, such as in the collective defense traits of shimmering and rearing-up, or it can happen as single-agent behavior. Abdomen flipping is also involved in flickering behavior, which occurs r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weihmann, Frank, Hoetzl, Thomas, Kastberger, Gerald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects3030833
_version_ 1782387925342748672
author Weihmann, Frank
Hoetzl, Thomas
Kastberger, Gerald
author_facet Weihmann, Frank
Hoetzl, Thomas
Kastberger, Gerald
author_sort Weihmann, Frank
collection PubMed
description In Giant Honey Bees, abdomen flipping happens in a variety of contexts. It can be either synchronous or cascaded, such as in the collective defense traits of shimmering and rearing-up, or it can happen as single-agent behavior. Abdomen flipping is also involved in flickering behavior, which occurs regularly under quiescent colony state displaying singular or collective traits, with stochastic, and (semi-) synchronized properties. It presumably acts via visual, mechanoceptive, and pheromonal pathways and its goals are still unknown. This study questions whether flickering is preliminary to shimmering which is subject of the fs (flickering-shimmering)-transition hypothesis? We tested the respective prediction that trigger sites (ts) at the nest surface (where shimmering waves had been generated) show higher flickering activity than the alternative non-trigger sites (nts). We measured the flickering activity of ts- and nts-surface bees from two experimental nests, before and after the colony had been aroused by a dummy wasp. Arousal increased rate and intensity of the flickering activity of both ts- and nts cohorts (P < 0.05), whereby the flickering intensity of ts-bees were higher than that of nts-bees (P < 0.05). Under arousal, the colonies also increased the number of flickering-active ts- and nts-cohorts (P < 0.05). This provides evidence that cohorts which are specialist at launching shimmering waves are found across the quiescent nest zone. It also proves that arousal may reinforce the responsiveness of quiescent curtain bees for participating in shimmering, practically by recruiting additional trigger site bees for expanding repetition of rate and intensity of shimmering waves. This finding confirms the fs-transition hypothesis and constitutes evidence that flickering is part of a basal colony-intrinsic information system. Furthermore, the findings disprove that the muscle activity associated with flickering would heat up the surface bees. Hence, surface bees are not actively contributing to thermoregulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4553592
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45535922015-10-08 Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata) Weihmann, Frank Hoetzl, Thomas Kastberger, Gerald Insects Article In Giant Honey Bees, abdomen flipping happens in a variety of contexts. It can be either synchronous or cascaded, such as in the collective defense traits of shimmering and rearing-up, or it can happen as single-agent behavior. Abdomen flipping is also involved in flickering behavior, which occurs regularly under quiescent colony state displaying singular or collective traits, with stochastic, and (semi-) synchronized properties. It presumably acts via visual, mechanoceptive, and pheromonal pathways and its goals are still unknown. This study questions whether flickering is preliminary to shimmering which is subject of the fs (flickering-shimmering)-transition hypothesis? We tested the respective prediction that trigger sites (ts) at the nest surface (where shimmering waves had been generated) show higher flickering activity than the alternative non-trigger sites (nts). We measured the flickering activity of ts- and nts-surface bees from two experimental nests, before and after the colony had been aroused by a dummy wasp. Arousal increased rate and intensity of the flickering activity of both ts- and nts cohorts (P < 0.05), whereby the flickering intensity of ts-bees were higher than that of nts-bees (P < 0.05). Under arousal, the colonies also increased the number of flickering-active ts- and nts-cohorts (P < 0.05). This provides evidence that cohorts which are specialist at launching shimmering waves are found across the quiescent nest zone. It also proves that arousal may reinforce the responsiveness of quiescent curtain bees for participating in shimmering, practically by recruiting additional trigger site bees for expanding repetition of rate and intensity of shimmering waves. This finding confirms the fs-transition hypothesis and constitutes evidence that flickering is part of a basal colony-intrinsic information system. Furthermore, the findings disprove that the muscle activity associated with flickering would heat up the surface bees. Hence, surface bees are not actively contributing to thermoregulation. MDPI 2012-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4553592/ /pubmed/26466631 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects3030833 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Weihmann, Frank
Hoetzl, Thomas
Kastberger, Gerald
Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_full Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_fullStr Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_full_unstemmed Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_short Training for Defense? From Stochastic Traits to Synchrony in Giant Honey Bees (Apis dorsata)
title_sort training for defense? from stochastic traits to synchrony in giant honey bees (apis dorsata)
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553592/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26466631
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects3030833
work_keys_str_mv AT weihmannfrank trainingfordefensefromstochastictraitstosynchronyingianthoneybeesapisdorsata
AT hoetzlthomas trainingfordefensefromstochastictraitstosynchronyingianthoneybeesapisdorsata
AT kastbergergerald trainingfordefensefromstochastictraitstosynchronyingianthoneybeesapisdorsata