Cargando…

Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Pollen extracts and chemically modified allergoids are used successfully in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Recombinant extracts offer potential advantages with respect to pharmaceutical quality, standardization and dosing. A hypoallergenic recombinant folding variant of the major birch po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Klimek, Ludger, Bachert, Claus, Lukat, Karl-Friedrich, Pfaar, Oliver, Meyer, Hanns, Narkus, Annemie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0071-x
_version_ 1782387978140647424
author Klimek, Ludger
Bachert, Claus
Lukat, Karl-Friedrich
Pfaar, Oliver
Meyer, Hanns
Narkus, Annemie
author_facet Klimek, Ludger
Bachert, Claus
Lukat, Karl-Friedrich
Pfaar, Oliver
Meyer, Hanns
Narkus, Annemie
author_sort Klimek, Ludger
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pollen extracts and chemically modified allergoids are used successfully in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Recombinant extracts offer potential advantages with respect to pharmaceutical quality, standardization and dosing. A hypoallergenic recombinant folding variant of the major birch pollen allergen (rBet v 1-FV) was compared with an established native birch preparation. A pre-seasonal, randomized, actively controlled phase II study was performed in birch pollen allergic rhino-conjunctivitis with or without asthma, GINA I/ II. 51 patients (24 rBet v 1-FV, 27 native extract) started therapy with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT). Primary end-point was a combined symptom medication score (SMS), changes in nasal provocation test, visual rating score and specific antibody responses secondary end-points. FINDINGS: After one pre-seasonal treatment course the combined SMS was 5.86 (median; IQR: 14.02) for the rBet v 1-FV group versus 12.40 (median; IQR: 9.32) for the comparator during the three weeks pollen season (p = 0.330). After treatment in the second year, scores were 3.00 (median; IQR: 6.50) and 2.93 (4.86) respectively. Allergen tolerance in a nasal provocation test improved to a comparable extent in both groups. Significant increases in birch pollen-specific IgG1 and IgG4 were observed in both treatment groups following the first treatment phase and remained significantly raised until the end of the study. CONCLUSION: In this first in man, proof of concept phase II trial no statistical difference between rBet v 1-FV and an established natural pollen extract could be observed. rBet v 1-FV could be administered in higher doses than the native protein with no increase in adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in clinicalTrials.gov (NCT00266526).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4553934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45539342015-09-01 Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial Klimek, Ludger Bachert, Claus Lukat, Karl-Friedrich Pfaar, Oliver Meyer, Hanns Narkus, Annemie Clin Transl Allergy Brief Communication BACKGROUND: Pollen extracts and chemically modified allergoids are used successfully in allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Recombinant extracts offer potential advantages with respect to pharmaceutical quality, standardization and dosing. A hypoallergenic recombinant folding variant of the major birch pollen allergen (rBet v 1-FV) was compared with an established native birch preparation. A pre-seasonal, randomized, actively controlled phase II study was performed in birch pollen allergic rhino-conjunctivitis with or without asthma, GINA I/ II. 51 patients (24 rBet v 1-FV, 27 native extract) started therapy with subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT). Primary end-point was a combined symptom medication score (SMS), changes in nasal provocation test, visual rating score and specific antibody responses secondary end-points. FINDINGS: After one pre-seasonal treatment course the combined SMS was 5.86 (median; IQR: 14.02) for the rBet v 1-FV group versus 12.40 (median; IQR: 9.32) for the comparator during the three weeks pollen season (p = 0.330). After treatment in the second year, scores were 3.00 (median; IQR: 6.50) and 2.93 (4.86) respectively. Allergen tolerance in a nasal provocation test improved to a comparable extent in both groups. Significant increases in birch pollen-specific IgG1 and IgG4 were observed in both treatment groups following the first treatment phase and remained significantly raised until the end of the study. CONCLUSION: In this first in man, proof of concept phase II trial no statistical difference between rBet v 1-FV and an established natural pollen extract could be observed. rBet v 1-FV could be administered in higher doses than the native protein with no increase in adverse effects. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered in clinicalTrials.gov (NCT00266526). BioMed Central 2015-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4553934/ /pubmed/26328056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0071-x Text en © Klimek et al. 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Klimek, Ludger
Bachert, Claus
Lukat, Karl-Friedrich
Pfaar, Oliver
Meyer, Hanns
Narkus, Annemie
Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial
title Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial
title_full Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial
title_short Allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rBet v 1-FV in a randomized controlled trial
title_sort allergy immunotherapy with a hypoallergenic recombinant birch pollen allergen rbet v 1-fv in a randomized controlled trial
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4553934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26328056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-015-0071-x
work_keys_str_mv AT klimekludger allergyimmunotherapywithahypoallergenicrecombinantbirchpollenallergenrbetv1fvinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT bachertclaus allergyimmunotherapywithahypoallergenicrecombinantbirchpollenallergenrbetv1fvinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lukatkarlfriedrich allergyimmunotherapywithahypoallergenicrecombinantbirchpollenallergenrbetv1fvinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pfaaroliver allergyimmunotherapywithahypoallergenicrecombinantbirchpollenallergenrbetv1fvinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT meyerhanns allergyimmunotherapywithahypoallergenicrecombinantbirchpollenallergenrbetv1fvinarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT narkusannemie allergyimmunotherapywithahypoallergenicrecombinantbirchpollenallergenrbetv1fvinarandomizedcontrolledtrial