Cargando…

Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology

In this study, productivity and physicochemical and microbiological (454 sequencing) parameters, as well as environmental criteria, were investigated in anaerobic reactors to contribute to the ongoing debate about the optimal temperature range for treating animal manure, and expand the general knowl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moset, Veronica, Poulsen, Morten, Wahid, Radziah, Højberg, Ole, Møller, Henrik Bjarne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25737010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12271
_version_ 1782388063821889536
author Moset, Veronica
Poulsen, Morten
Wahid, Radziah
Højberg, Ole
Møller, Henrik Bjarne
author_facet Moset, Veronica
Poulsen, Morten
Wahid, Radziah
Højberg, Ole
Møller, Henrik Bjarne
author_sort Moset, Veronica
collection PubMed
description In this study, productivity and physicochemical and microbiological (454 sequencing) parameters, as well as environmental criteria, were investigated in anaerobic reactors to contribute to the ongoing debate about the optimal temperature range for treating animal manure, and expand the general knowledge on the relation between microbiological and physicochemical process indicators. For this purpose, two reactor sizes were used (10 m(3) and 16 l), in which two temperature conditions (35°C and 50°C) were tested. In addition, the effect of the hydraulic retention time was evaluated (16 versus 20 days). Thermophilic anaerobic digestion showed higher organic matter degradation (especially fiber), higher pH and higher methane (CH(4)) yield, as well as better percentage of ultimate CH(4) yield retrieved and lower residual CH(4) emission, when compared with mesophilic conditions. In addition, lower microbial diversity was found in the thermophilic reactors, especially for Bacteria, where a clear intensification towards Clostridia class members was evident. Independent of temperature, some similarities were found in digestates when comparing with animal manure, including low volatile fatty acids concentrations and a high fraction of Euryarchaeota in the total microbial community, in which members of Methanosarcinales dominated for both temperature conditions; these indicators could be considered a sign of process stability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4554467
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45544672015-09-04 Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology Moset, Veronica Poulsen, Morten Wahid, Radziah Højberg, Ole Møller, Henrik Bjarne Microb Biotechnol Research Articles In this study, productivity and physicochemical and microbiological (454 sequencing) parameters, as well as environmental criteria, were investigated in anaerobic reactors to contribute to the ongoing debate about the optimal temperature range for treating animal manure, and expand the general knowledge on the relation between microbiological and physicochemical process indicators. For this purpose, two reactor sizes were used (10 m(3) and 16 l), in which two temperature conditions (35°C and 50°C) were tested. In addition, the effect of the hydraulic retention time was evaluated (16 versus 20 days). Thermophilic anaerobic digestion showed higher organic matter degradation (especially fiber), higher pH and higher methane (CH(4)) yield, as well as better percentage of ultimate CH(4) yield retrieved and lower residual CH(4) emission, when compared with mesophilic conditions. In addition, lower microbial diversity was found in the thermophilic reactors, especially for Bacteria, where a clear intensification towards Clostridia class members was evident. Independent of temperature, some similarities were found in digestates when comparing with animal manure, including low volatile fatty acids concentrations and a high fraction of Euryarchaeota in the total microbial community, in which members of Methanosarcinales dominated for both temperature conditions; these indicators could be considered a sign of process stability. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd 2015-09 2015-03-04 /pmc/articles/PMC4554467/ /pubmed/25737010 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12271 Text en Journal compilation © 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd and Society for Applied Microbiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Moset, Veronica
Poulsen, Morten
Wahid, Radziah
Højberg, Ole
Møller, Henrik Bjarne
Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
title Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
title_full Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
title_fullStr Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
title_full_unstemmed Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
title_short Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
title_sort mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554467/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25737010
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.12271
work_keys_str_mv AT mosetveronica mesophilicversusthermophilicanaerobicdigestionofcattlemanuremethaneproductivityandmicrobialecology
AT poulsenmorten mesophilicversusthermophilicanaerobicdigestionofcattlemanuremethaneproductivityandmicrobialecology
AT wahidradziah mesophilicversusthermophilicanaerobicdigestionofcattlemanuremethaneproductivityandmicrobialecology
AT højbergole mesophilicversusthermophilicanaerobicdigestionofcattlemanuremethaneproductivityandmicrobialecology
AT møllerhenrikbjarne mesophilicversusthermophilicanaerobicdigestionofcattlemanuremethaneproductivityandmicrobialecology