Cargando…
Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review
Background: Endoscopic stenting is a widely used method for managing esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have proved effective in sealing these defects, with a lower rate of displacement than that of self-expanding plastic stents (SEPSs) as a result of...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391419 |
_version_ | 1782388070010585088 |
---|---|
author | Aiolfi, Alberto Bona, Davide Ceriani, Chiara Porro, Matteo Bonavina, Luigi |
author_facet | Aiolfi, Alberto Bona, Davide Ceriani, Chiara Porro, Matteo Bonavina, Luigi |
author_sort | Aiolfi, Alberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Endoscopic stenting is a widely used method for managing esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have proved effective in sealing these defects, with a lower rate of displacement than that of self-expanding plastic stents (SEPSs) as a result of tissue proliferation and granulation tissue ingrowth at the uncovered portion of the stent, which anchor the prosthesis to the esophageal wall. Removal of a fully embedded stent is challenging because of the risk of bleeding and tears. Materials and methods: Temporary placement of a new stent within the first stent (stent-in-stent technique) may facilitate the mobilization and safe removal of both stents by inducing pressure ischemia of the granulation tissue. We report our own experience with the stent-in-stent technique in five consecutive patients in whom a partially covered Ultraflex stent had previously been implanted and compare our results with those in the current literature. Results: The first SEMSs remained in place for a median of 40 days (range 18 – 68) without displacement. Placement of the new stent was technically successful in all patients. All stents were left in place for a median of 9 days. The overall stent-in-stent success rate was 100 % for the removal of embedded stents. No serious adverse events related to the procedure occurred. Conclusion: The procedure was safe, well tolerated, and effective. The use of a partially covered Ultraflex stent of the same size as the old stent for a limited time (≤ 6 days) was consistently successful. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4554508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | © Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45545082015-09-09 Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review Aiolfi, Alberto Bona, Davide Ceriani, Chiara Porro, Matteo Bonavina, Luigi Endosc Int Open Article Background: Endoscopic stenting is a widely used method for managing esophageal anastomotic leaks and perforations. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have proved effective in sealing these defects, with a lower rate of displacement than that of self-expanding plastic stents (SEPSs) as a result of tissue proliferation and granulation tissue ingrowth at the uncovered portion of the stent, which anchor the prosthesis to the esophageal wall. Removal of a fully embedded stent is challenging because of the risk of bleeding and tears. Materials and methods: Temporary placement of a new stent within the first stent (stent-in-stent technique) may facilitate the mobilization and safe removal of both stents by inducing pressure ischemia of the granulation tissue. We report our own experience with the stent-in-stent technique in five consecutive patients in whom a partially covered Ultraflex stent had previously been implanted and compare our results with those in the current literature. Results: The first SEMSs remained in place for a median of 40 days (range 18 – 68) without displacement. Placement of the new stent was technically successful in all patients. All stents were left in place for a median of 9 days. The overall stent-in-stent success rate was 100 % for the removal of embedded stents. No serious adverse events related to the procedure occurred. Conclusion: The procedure was safe, well tolerated, and effective. The use of a partially covered Ultraflex stent of the same size as the old stent for a limited time (≤ 6 days) was consistently successful. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2015-08 2015-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4554508/ /pubmed/26357006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391419 Text en © Thieme Medical Publishers |
spellingShingle | Article Aiolfi, Alberto Bona, Davide Ceriani, Chiara Porro, Matteo Bonavina, Luigi Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
title | Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
title_full | Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
title_fullStr | Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
title_short | Stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
title_sort | stent-in-stent, a safe and effective technique to remove fully embedded esophageal metal stents: case series and literature review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26357006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1391419 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aiolfialberto stentinstentasafeandeffectivetechniquetoremovefullyembeddedesophagealmetalstentscaseseriesandliteraturereview AT bonadavide stentinstentasafeandeffectivetechniquetoremovefullyembeddedesophagealmetalstentscaseseriesandliteraturereview AT cerianichiara stentinstentasafeandeffectivetechniquetoremovefullyembeddedesophagealmetalstentscaseseriesandliteraturereview AT porromatteo stentinstentasafeandeffectivetechniquetoremovefullyembeddedesophagealmetalstentscaseseriesandliteraturereview AT bonavinaluigi stentinstentasafeandeffectivetechniquetoremovefullyembeddedesophagealmetalstentscaseseriesandliteraturereview |