Cargando…
Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers
A set of prediction equations to estimate the nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) of individual ingredients and diets used in the poultry feed industry was evaluated. The AMEn values of three energy ingredients (maize, sorghum and defatted maize germ meal), four protein ingredien...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST)
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194230 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0339 |
_version_ | 1782388096845742080 |
---|---|
author | Alvarenga, R. R. Rodrigues, P. B. Zangeronimo, M. G. Oliveira, E. C. Mariano, F. C. M. Q. Lima, E. M. C. Garcia, A. A. P. Naves, L. P. Nardelli, N. B. S. |
author_facet | Alvarenga, R. R. Rodrigues, P. B. Zangeronimo, M. G. Oliveira, E. C. Mariano, F. C. M. Q. Lima, E. M. C. Garcia, A. A. P. Naves, L. P. Nardelli, N. B. S. |
author_sort | Alvarenga, R. R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | A set of prediction equations to estimate the nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) of individual ingredients and diets used in the poultry feed industry was evaluated. The AMEn values of three energy ingredients (maize, sorghum and defatted maize germ meal), four protein ingredients (soybean meal, maize gluten meal 60% crude protein, integral micronized soy and roasted whole soybean) and four diets (three containing four feedstuffs, complex diets, and one containing only corn-soybean meal, basal diet) were determined using a metabolism assay with male broilers from 1 to 7, 8 to 21, 22 to 35, and 36 to 42 days old. These values were compared to the AMEn values presented in the tables of energy composition or estimated by equation predictions based on chemical composition data of feedstuffs. In general, the equation predictions more precisely estimated the AMEn of feedstuffs when compared to the tables of energy composition. The equation AMEn (dry matter [DM] basis) = 4,164.187+51.006 ether extract (% in DM basis)–197.663 ash–35.689 crude fiber (% in DM basis)–20.593 neutral detergent fiber (% in DM basis) (R(2) = 0.75) was the most applicable for the prediction of the energy values of feedstuffs and diets used in the poultry feed industry. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4554875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45548752015-09-01 Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers Alvarenga, R. R. Rodrigues, P. B. Zangeronimo, M. G. Oliveira, E. C. Mariano, F. C. M. Q. Lima, E. M. C. Garcia, A. A. P. Naves, L. P. Nardelli, N. B. S. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci Article A set of prediction equations to estimate the nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) of individual ingredients and diets used in the poultry feed industry was evaluated. The AMEn values of three energy ingredients (maize, sorghum and defatted maize germ meal), four protein ingredients (soybean meal, maize gluten meal 60% crude protein, integral micronized soy and roasted whole soybean) and four diets (three containing four feedstuffs, complex diets, and one containing only corn-soybean meal, basal diet) were determined using a metabolism assay with male broilers from 1 to 7, 8 to 21, 22 to 35, and 36 to 42 days old. These values were compared to the AMEn values presented in the tables of energy composition or estimated by equation predictions based on chemical composition data of feedstuffs. In general, the equation predictions more precisely estimated the AMEn of feedstuffs when compared to the tables of energy composition. The equation AMEn (dry matter [DM] basis) = 4,164.187+51.006 ether extract (% in DM basis)–197.663 ash–35.689 crude fiber (% in DM basis)–20.593 neutral detergent fiber (% in DM basis) (R(2) = 0.75) was the most applicable for the prediction of the energy values of feedstuffs and diets used in the poultry feed industry. Asian-Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (AAAP) and Korean Society of Animal Science and Technology (KSAST) 2015-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4554875/ /pubmed/26194230 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0339 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences |
spellingShingle | Article Alvarenga, R. R. Rodrigues, P. B. Zangeronimo, M. G. Oliveira, E. C. Mariano, F. C. M. Q. Lima, E. M. C. Garcia, A. A. P. Naves, L. P. Nardelli, N. B. S. Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers |
title | Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers |
title_full | Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers |
title_fullStr | Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers |
title_short | Validation of Prediction Equations of Energy Values of a Single Ingredient or Their Combinations in Male Broilers |
title_sort | validation of prediction equations of energy values of a single ingredient or their combinations in male broilers |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4554875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26194230 http://dx.doi.org/10.5713/ajas.14.0339 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alvarengarr validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT rodriguespb validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT zangeronimomg validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT oliveiraec validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT marianofcmq validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT limaemc validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT garciaaap validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT naveslp validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers AT nardellinbs validationofpredictionequationsofenergyvaluesofasingleingredientortheircombinationsinmalebroilers |