Cargando…

A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in adults often utilizes screw fixation in the distal femur. The aim was to define the safety of similar fixation in young patients, with respect to their open physis. PURPOSE: To define the age-related relationship between the femoral...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Greenrod, William, Cox, James, Astori, Ivan, Baulch, Justin, Williams, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113502638
_version_ 1782388212644184064
author Greenrod, William
Cox, James
Astori, Ivan
Baulch, Justin
Williams, John
author_facet Greenrod, William
Cox, James
Astori, Ivan
Baulch, Justin
Williams, John
author_sort Greenrod, William
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in adults often utilizes screw fixation in the distal femur. The aim was to define the safety of similar fixation in young patients, with respect to their open physis. PURPOSE: To define the age-related relationship between the femoral insertion of the MPFL and the medial aspect of the distal femoral physis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The study investigates whether screw fixation at this point is safe with respect to patient age and screw inclination. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Retrospective review of the MRI scans of 159 skeletally immature patients. The femoral insertion of the MPFL was defined with respect to the distal femoral physis. The predicted paths of 2-cm screw fixation were simulated both parallel to the joint line and 45° distally oblique; physeal and joint penetration were noted when present. Results are plotted against age and compared as quartile ranges. RESULTS: The femoral insertion of the MPFL was found to be distal to the distal femoral physis in all patients by an average of 10 mm (range, 2-16 mm). The mean distance increases slightly with age in a nonlinear relationship (r = 0.51, P < .001) from 9 mm at age 10 years to 12 mm by age 16 years. For the classic, parallel screw, the risk of physeal breach is high for all age groups (mean, 64%). For the novel, oblique screw, joint penetration and physeal breach were less prevalent (mean, 13%), and importantly, the vast majority of these breaches were in younger children (age <9 years 9 months). With oblique screws, older children were at significantly lower risk than younger children (<3% vs 48%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study accurately defines the relationship between the femoral insertion of the MPFL and the distal femoral physis in children and adolescents. A high risk of potentially poor outcomes was found during anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL in children utilizing classic (parallel) screw fixation, irrespective of age. However, in children older than 10 years, a 20-mm screw, from the anatomic MPFL insertion and directed 45° distally oblique, should be safe in 98% of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45554932015-11-03 A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Greenrod, William Cox, James Astori, Ivan Baulch, Justin Williams, John Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction in adults often utilizes screw fixation in the distal femur. The aim was to define the safety of similar fixation in young patients, with respect to their open physis. PURPOSE: To define the age-related relationship between the femoral insertion of the MPFL and the medial aspect of the distal femoral physis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. The study investigates whether screw fixation at this point is safe with respect to patient age and screw inclination. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Retrospective review of the MRI scans of 159 skeletally immature patients. The femoral insertion of the MPFL was defined with respect to the distal femoral physis. The predicted paths of 2-cm screw fixation were simulated both parallel to the joint line and 45° distally oblique; physeal and joint penetration were noted when present. Results are plotted against age and compared as quartile ranges. RESULTS: The femoral insertion of the MPFL was found to be distal to the distal femoral physis in all patients by an average of 10 mm (range, 2-16 mm). The mean distance increases slightly with age in a nonlinear relationship (r = 0.51, P < .001) from 9 mm at age 10 years to 12 mm by age 16 years. For the classic, parallel screw, the risk of physeal breach is high for all age groups (mean, 64%). For the novel, oblique screw, joint penetration and physeal breach were less prevalent (mean, 13%), and importantly, the vast majority of these breaches were in younger children (age <9 years 9 months). With oblique screws, older children were at significantly lower risk than younger children (<3% vs 48%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: This study accurately defines the relationship between the femoral insertion of the MPFL and the distal femoral physis in children and adolescents. A high risk of potentially poor outcomes was found during anatomic reconstruction of the MPFL in children utilizing classic (parallel) screw fixation, irrespective of age. However, in children older than 10 years, a 20-mm screw, from the anatomic MPFL insertion and directed 45° distally oblique, should be safe in 98% of patients. SAGE Publications 2013-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4555493/ /pubmed/26535244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113502638 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Greenrod, William
Cox, James
Astori, Ivan
Baulch, Justin
Williams, John
A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
title A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
title_full A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
title_short A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Significance of the Distal Femoral Physis During Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging study of the significance of the distal femoral physis during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113502638
work_keys_str_mv AT greenrodwilliam amagneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT coxjames amagneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT astoriivan amagneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT baulchjustin amagneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT williamsjohn amagneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT greenrodwilliam magneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT coxjames magneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT astoriivan magneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT baulchjustin magneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction
AT williamsjohn magneticresonanceimagingstudyofthesignificanceofthedistalfemoralphysisduringmedialpatellofemoralligamentreconstruction