Cargando…

Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

BACKGROUND: The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake. PURPOSE: To assess the differences in knee kinematics of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsushita, Takehiko, Oka, Shinya, Nagamune, Kouki, Matsumoto, Tomoyuki, Nishizawa, Yuichiro, Hoshino, Yuichi, Kubo, Seiji, Kurosaka, Masahiro, Kuroda, Ryosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113487855
_version_ 1782388216102387712
author Matsushita, Takehiko
Oka, Shinya
Nagamune, Kouki
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
Nishizawa, Yuichiro
Hoshino, Yuichi
Kubo, Seiji
Kurosaka, Masahiro
Kuroda, Ryosuke
author_facet Matsushita, Takehiko
Oka, Shinya
Nagamune, Kouki
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
Nishizawa, Yuichiro
Hoshino, Yuichi
Kubo, Seiji
Kurosaka, Masahiro
Kuroda, Ryosuke
author_sort Matsushita, Takehiko
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake. PURPOSE: To assess the differences in knee kinematics of awake and anesthetized patients. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with unilateral ACL rupture were examined. Anteroposterior tibial translation was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer at maximal manual power. Anterior tibial translations during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of tibial posterior translation (APT) during the pivot-shift test were also measured using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS). All 3 measurements were performed on the day previous to surgery while the patients were awake and on the operative day before the surgery while the patients were under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation was 5.6 ± 2.6 mm in the awake state and 5.9 ± 3.5 mm under anesthesia, indicating a nonsignificant difference. According to the EMS, the mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation during the Lachman test was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm in the awake state and 6.9 ± 4.3 mm under anesthesia, indicating a significant difference (P < .01). The mean APT during the pivot-shift test was −0.8 ± 0.3 m/s(2) in intact knees and −1.1 ± 0.4 m/s(2) in ACL-deficient knees when the patients were awake and was −0.7 ± 0.2 m/s(2) and −1.7 ± 1.0 m/s(2), respectively, when the patients were under anesthesia. In ACL-deficient knees, the APT pivot-shift test result was significantly higher when the patients were under anesthesia than when they were awake (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In ACL-deficient knees, the knee kinematics during the Lachman and pivot-shift tests is significantly affected by patient consciousness, and caution is needed in quantifying anterior knee laxity during these tests when the patients are awake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45555082015-11-03 Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Matsushita, Takehiko Oka, Shinya Nagamune, Kouki Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Nishizawa, Yuichiro Hoshino, Yuichi Kubo, Seiji Kurosaka, Masahiro Kuroda, Ryosuke Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake. PURPOSE: To assess the differences in knee kinematics of awake and anesthetized patients. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with unilateral ACL rupture were examined. Anteroposterior tibial translation was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer at maximal manual power. Anterior tibial translations during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of tibial posterior translation (APT) during the pivot-shift test were also measured using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS). All 3 measurements were performed on the day previous to surgery while the patients were awake and on the operative day before the surgery while the patients were under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation was 5.6 ± 2.6 mm in the awake state and 5.9 ± 3.5 mm under anesthesia, indicating a nonsignificant difference. According to the EMS, the mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation during the Lachman test was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm in the awake state and 6.9 ± 4.3 mm under anesthesia, indicating a significant difference (P < .01). The mean APT during the pivot-shift test was −0.8 ± 0.3 m/s(2) in intact knees and −1.1 ± 0.4 m/s(2) in ACL-deficient knees when the patients were awake and was −0.7 ± 0.2 m/s(2) and −1.7 ± 1.0 m/s(2), respectively, when the patients were under anesthesia. In ACL-deficient knees, the APT pivot-shift test result was significantly higher when the patients were under anesthesia than when they were awake (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In ACL-deficient knees, the knee kinematics during the Lachman and pivot-shift tests is significantly affected by patient consciousness, and caution is needed in quantifying anterior knee laxity during these tests when the patients are awake. SAGE Publications 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4555508/ /pubmed/26535229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113487855 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle Article
Matsushita, Takehiko
Oka, Shinya
Nagamune, Kouki
Matsumoto, Tomoyuki
Nishizawa, Yuichiro
Hoshino, Yuichi
Kubo, Seiji
Kurosaka, Masahiro
Kuroda, Ryosuke
Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_full Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_fullStr Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_short Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_sort differences in knee kinematics between awake and anesthetized patients during the lachman and pivot-shift tests for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535229
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113487855
work_keys_str_mv AT matsushitatakehiko differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT okashinya differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT nagamunekouki differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT matsumototomoyuki differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT nishizawayuichiro differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT hoshinoyuichi differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT kuboseiji differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT kurosakamasahiro differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT kurodaryosuke differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency