Cargando…
Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
BACKGROUND: The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake. PURPOSE: To assess the differences in knee kinematics of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113487855 |
_version_ | 1782388216102387712 |
---|---|
author | Matsushita, Takehiko Oka, Shinya Nagamune, Kouki Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Nishizawa, Yuichiro Hoshino, Yuichi Kubo, Seiji Kurosaka, Masahiro Kuroda, Ryosuke |
author_facet | Matsushita, Takehiko Oka, Shinya Nagamune, Kouki Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Nishizawa, Yuichiro Hoshino, Yuichi Kubo, Seiji Kurosaka, Masahiro Kuroda, Ryosuke |
author_sort | Matsushita, Takehiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake. PURPOSE: To assess the differences in knee kinematics of awake and anesthetized patients. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with unilateral ACL rupture were examined. Anteroposterior tibial translation was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer at maximal manual power. Anterior tibial translations during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of tibial posterior translation (APT) during the pivot-shift test were also measured using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS). All 3 measurements were performed on the day previous to surgery while the patients were awake and on the operative day before the surgery while the patients were under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation was 5.6 ± 2.6 mm in the awake state and 5.9 ± 3.5 mm under anesthesia, indicating a nonsignificant difference. According to the EMS, the mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation during the Lachman test was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm in the awake state and 6.9 ± 4.3 mm under anesthesia, indicating a significant difference (P < .01). The mean APT during the pivot-shift test was −0.8 ± 0.3 m/s(2) in intact knees and −1.1 ± 0.4 m/s(2) in ACL-deficient knees when the patients were awake and was −0.7 ± 0.2 m/s(2) and −1.7 ± 1.0 m/s(2), respectively, when the patients were under anesthesia. In ACL-deficient knees, the APT pivot-shift test result was significantly higher when the patients were under anesthesia than when they were awake (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In ACL-deficient knees, the knee kinematics during the Lachman and pivot-shift tests is significantly affected by patient consciousness, and caution is needed in quantifying anterior knee laxity during these tests when the patients are awake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555508 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45555082015-11-03 Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Matsushita, Takehiko Oka, Shinya Nagamune, Kouki Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Nishizawa, Yuichiro Hoshino, Yuichi Kubo, Seiji Kurosaka, Masahiro Kuroda, Ryosuke Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: The Lachman and pivot-shift tests have been widely used for detecting anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficiency. However, it still remains unclear whether these manual tests can be quantified accurately while patients are awake. PURPOSE: To assess the differences in knee kinematics of awake and anesthetized patients. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with unilateral ACL rupture were examined. Anteroposterior tibial translation was assessed using a KT-1000 arthrometer at maximal manual power. Anterior tibial translations during the manual Lachman test and the acceleration of tibial posterior translation (APT) during the pivot-shift test were also measured using an electromagnetic measurement system (EMS). All 3 measurements were performed on the day previous to surgery while the patients were awake and on the operative day before the surgery while the patients were under general anesthesia. RESULTS: The mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation was 5.6 ± 2.6 mm in the awake state and 5.9 ± 3.5 mm under anesthesia, indicating a nonsignificant difference. According to the EMS, the mean side-to-side difference in anteroposterior tibial translation during the Lachman test was 4.6 ± 3.6 mm in the awake state and 6.9 ± 4.3 mm under anesthesia, indicating a significant difference (P < .01). The mean APT during the pivot-shift test was −0.8 ± 0.3 m/s(2) in intact knees and −1.1 ± 0.4 m/s(2) in ACL-deficient knees when the patients were awake and was −0.7 ± 0.2 m/s(2) and −1.7 ± 1.0 m/s(2), respectively, when the patients were under anesthesia. In ACL-deficient knees, the APT pivot-shift test result was significantly higher when the patients were under anesthesia than when they were awake (P < .01). CONCLUSION: In ACL-deficient knees, the knee kinematics during the Lachman and pivot-shift tests is significantly affected by patient consciousness, and caution is needed in quantifying anterior knee laxity during these tests when the patients are awake. SAGE Publications 2013-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4555508/ /pubmed/26535229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113487855 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | Article Matsushita, Takehiko Oka, Shinya Nagamune, Kouki Matsumoto, Tomoyuki Nishizawa, Yuichiro Hoshino, Yuichi Kubo, Seiji Kurosaka, Masahiro Kuroda, Ryosuke Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency |
title | Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency |
title_full | Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency |
title_fullStr | Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency |
title_short | Differences in Knee Kinematics Between Awake and Anesthetized Patients During the Lachman and Pivot-Shift Tests for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency |
title_sort | differences in knee kinematics between awake and anesthetized patients during the lachman and pivot-shift tests for anterior cruciate ligament deficiency |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555508/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535229 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113487855 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsushitatakehiko differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT okashinya differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT nagamunekouki differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT matsumototomoyuki differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT nishizawayuichiro differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT hoshinoyuichi differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT kuboseiji differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT kurosakamasahiro differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency AT kurodaryosuke differencesinkneekinematicsbetweenawakeandanesthetizedpatientsduringthelachmanandpivotshifttestsforanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency |