Cargando…

Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pectoralis major tears early in the acute phase is important for optimizing surgical repair and outcomes. However, physical examination of pectoralis major injuries can be misleading, often resulting in a potentially detrimental delay in surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To estab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElMaraghy, Amr W., Rehsia, Sacha S., Pennings, Amanda L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2013
Materias:
121
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113516729
_version_ 1782388217690980352
author ElMaraghy, Amr W.
Rehsia, Sacha S.
Pennings, Amanda L.
author_facet ElMaraghy, Amr W.
Rehsia, Sacha S.
Pennings, Amanda L.
author_sort ElMaraghy, Amr W.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pectoralis major tears early in the acute phase is important for optimizing surgical repair and outcomes. However, physical examination of pectoralis major injuries can be misleading, often resulting in a potentially detrimental delay in surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To establish and validate a quantifiable clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 50 healthy male participants (mean age, 43.3 ± 11.9 years) with normal uninjured pectoralis major anatomy were examined. Digital photographs of all participants were taken in the “military press” starting position (90° of shoulder abduction, 90° of shoulder external rotation). The length between the ipsilateral nipple and the apex of the pectoralis major muscle curvature along the anterior axillary fold, known as the pectoralis major distance, was measured bilaterally. Two orthopaedic surgeons measured all photographs on 2 separate occasions. The pectoralis major index (PMI) was calculated as a ratio of pectoralis major distance values to establish normal values. The PMI was also calculated in a cohort of 19 male patients (mean age, 33.8 ± 6.8 years) with a pectoralis major rupture to assess the diagnostic utility of this novel quantifiable physical examination technique. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) PMI for the uninjured group was 1.0 ± 0.07. A diagnostic threshold of a PMI <0.9 resulted in a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 98%, and overall accuracy of 93% in identifying structurally significant pectoralis major ruptures. There was no correlation between PMI and age or activity level, including participation in sports and/or weight training. The PMI technique demonstrated good to excellent intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.82, 0.74) and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.63, 0.76). CONCLUSION: The PMI technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears. Routine application of the PMI technique by clinicians may improve accurate identification of structurally significant rupture and expedite referral to a surgical specialist for optimal treatment and outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555516
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45555162015-11-03 Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears ElMaraghy, Amr W. Rehsia, Sacha S. Pennings, Amanda L. Orthop J Sports Med 121 BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pectoralis major tears early in the acute phase is important for optimizing surgical repair and outcomes. However, physical examination of pectoralis major injuries can be misleading, often resulting in a potentially detrimental delay in surgical treatment. PURPOSE: To establish and validate a quantifiable clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2. METHODS: A total of 50 healthy male participants (mean age, 43.3 ± 11.9 years) with normal uninjured pectoralis major anatomy were examined. Digital photographs of all participants were taken in the “military press” starting position (90° of shoulder abduction, 90° of shoulder external rotation). The length between the ipsilateral nipple and the apex of the pectoralis major muscle curvature along the anterior axillary fold, known as the pectoralis major distance, was measured bilaterally. Two orthopaedic surgeons measured all photographs on 2 separate occasions. The pectoralis major index (PMI) was calculated as a ratio of pectoralis major distance values to establish normal values. The PMI was also calculated in a cohort of 19 male patients (mean age, 33.8 ± 6.8 years) with a pectoralis major rupture to assess the diagnostic utility of this novel quantifiable physical examination technique. RESULTS: Mean (± standard deviation) PMI for the uninjured group was 1.0 ± 0.07. A diagnostic threshold of a PMI <0.9 resulted in a sensitivity of 79%, specificity of 98%, and overall accuracy of 93% in identifying structurally significant pectoralis major ruptures. There was no correlation between PMI and age or activity level, including participation in sports and/or weight training. The PMI technique demonstrated good to excellent intrarater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.82, 0.74) and interrater reliability (ICC = 0.63, 0.76). CONCLUSION: The PMI technique is a simple, quantifiable, and accurate clinical diagnostic test for structurally significant pectoralis major tears. Routine application of the PMI technique by clinicians may improve accurate identification of structurally significant rupture and expedite referral to a surgical specialist for optimal treatment and outcome. SAGE Publications 2013-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4555516/ /pubmed/26535260 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113516729 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle 121
ElMaraghy, Amr W.
Rehsia, Sacha S.
Pennings, Amanda L.
Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears
title Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears
title_full Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears
title_fullStr Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears
title_full_unstemmed Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears
title_short Utility of the Pectoralis Major Index in the Diagnosis of Structurally Significant Pectoralis Major Tears
title_sort utility of the pectoralis major index in the diagnosis of structurally significant pectoralis major tears
topic 121
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555516/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535260
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113516729
work_keys_str_mv AT elmaraghyamrw utilityofthepectoralismajorindexinthediagnosisofstructurallysignificantpectoralismajortears
AT rehsiasachas utilityofthepectoralismajorindexinthediagnosisofstructurallysignificantpectoralismajortears
AT penningsamandal utilityofthepectoralismajorindexinthediagnosisofstructurallysignificantpectoralismajortears