Cargando…
Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
BACKGROUND: When to allow an athlete to return to unrestricted sporting activity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. PURPOSE: To report the results of functional performance testing reported in the literature for individuals at differing time points following...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113518305 |
_version_ | 1782388219848949760 |
---|---|
author | Abrams, Geoffrey D. Harris, Joshua D. Gupta, Anil K. McCormick, Frank M. Bush-Joseph, Charles A. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Bach, Bernard R. |
author_facet | Abrams, Geoffrey D. Harris, Joshua D. Gupta, Anil K. McCormick, Frank M. Bush-Joseph, Charles A. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Bach, Bernard R. |
author_sort | Abrams, Geoffrey D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: When to allow an athlete to return to unrestricted sporting activity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. PURPOSE: To report the results of functional performance testing reported in the literature for individuals at differing time points following ACL reconstruction and to examine differences between graft types. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies that examined any functional rehabilitation test from 6 months to 2 years following ACL reconstruction. All patient-, limb-, and knee-specific demographics were extracted from included investigations. All functional rehabilitation tests were analyzed and compared when applicable. RESULTS: The search term returned a total of 890 potential studies, with 88 meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 4927 patients were included, of which 66% were male. The mean patient age was 26.5 ± 3.4 years. The predominant graft choices for reconstruction were bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autograft (59.8%) and hamstring autograft (37.9%). The most commonly reported functional tests were the hop tests. The results of these functional tests, as reported in the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), improved with increasing time, with nearly all results greater than 90% at 1 year following primary ACL reconstruction. At 6 months postoperatively, a number of isokinetic strength measurements failed to reach 80% LSI, most commonly isokinetic knee extension testing in both BPTB and hamstring autograft groups. The knee flexion strength deficit was significantly less in the BPTB autograft group as compared with those having hamstring autograft at 1 year postoperatively, while no significant differences were found in isokinetic extension strength between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Hop testing was the most commonly reported functional test following ACL reconstruction. Increases in performance on functional tests were predictably seen as time increased following surgery. Those with hamstring autografts may experience increased strength deficits with knee flexion versus those having BPTB autograft. These data provide information that may assist providers in determining timing of return to unrestricted sporting activity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45555252015-11-03 Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review Abrams, Geoffrey D. Harris, Joshua D. Gupta, Anil K. McCormick, Frank M. Bush-Joseph, Charles A. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Bach, Bernard R. Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: When to allow an athlete to return to unrestricted sporting activity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains controversial. PURPOSE: To report the results of functional performance testing reported in the literature for individuals at differing time points following ACL reconstruction and to examine differences between graft types. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A systematic review of Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was performed using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were English-language studies that examined any functional rehabilitation test from 6 months to 2 years following ACL reconstruction. All patient-, limb-, and knee-specific demographics were extracted from included investigations. All functional rehabilitation tests were analyzed and compared when applicable. RESULTS: The search term returned a total of 890 potential studies, with 88 meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 4927 patients were included, of which 66% were male. The mean patient age was 26.5 ± 3.4 years. The predominant graft choices for reconstruction were bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autograft (59.8%) and hamstring autograft (37.9%). The most commonly reported functional tests were the hop tests. The results of these functional tests, as reported in the Limb Symmetry Index (LSI), improved with increasing time, with nearly all results greater than 90% at 1 year following primary ACL reconstruction. At 6 months postoperatively, a number of isokinetic strength measurements failed to reach 80% LSI, most commonly isokinetic knee extension testing in both BPTB and hamstring autograft groups. The knee flexion strength deficit was significantly less in the BPTB autograft group as compared with those having hamstring autograft at 1 year postoperatively, while no significant differences were found in isokinetic extension strength between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Hop testing was the most commonly reported functional test following ACL reconstruction. Increases in performance on functional tests were predictably seen as time increased following surgery. Those with hamstring autografts may experience increased strength deficits with knee flexion versus those having BPTB autograft. These data provide information that may assist providers in determining timing of return to unrestricted sporting activity. SAGE Publications 2014-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4555525/ /pubmed/26535266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113518305 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | 25 Abrams, Geoffrey D. Harris, Joshua D. Gupta, Anil K. McCormick, Frank M. Bush-Joseph, Charles A. Verma, Nikhil N. Cole, Brian J. Bach, Bernard R. Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title | Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Functional Performance Testing After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review |
topic | 25 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113518305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abramsgeoffreyd functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT harrisjoshuad functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT guptaanilk functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT mccormickfrankm functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT bushjosephcharlesa functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT vermanikhiln functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT colebrianj functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview AT bachbernardr functionalperformancetestingafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionasystematicreview |