Cargando…

Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling

BACKGROUND: Advocates of medial portal drilling claim that the transtibial technique results in a more vertical positioning of the graft, which could lead to subsequent failure and/or a residual pivot shift on postoperative examination. However, advocates of transtibial drilling state that with appr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dugas, Jeffrey R., Pace, Jesse L., Bolt, Becky, Wear, Shane A., Beason, David P., Cain, E. Lyle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2014
Materias:
25
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114525572
_version_ 1782388229329125376
author Dugas, Jeffrey R.
Pace, Jesse L.
Bolt, Becky
Wear, Shane A.
Beason, David P.
Cain, E. Lyle
author_facet Dugas, Jeffrey R.
Pace, Jesse L.
Bolt, Becky
Wear, Shane A.
Beason, David P.
Cain, E. Lyle
author_sort Dugas, Jeffrey R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Advocates of medial portal drilling claim that the transtibial technique results in a more vertical positioning of the graft, which could lead to subsequent failure and/or a residual pivot shift on postoperative examination. However, advocates of transtibial drilling state that with appropriate placement and adequate notchplasty, their technique places the graft in a more anatomically correct position on the wall, negating the resultant potential for pivot shift and early postoperative failure. HYPOTHESIS: Transtibial femoral drilling can adequately reproduce the femoral origin of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and place the graft in an anatomical position equivalent to medial portal drilling. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten matched-pair cadaveric knees (N = 20) were scanned using computed tomography (CT), and 3-dimensional images of the native ACL origin were reconstructed. The matched pairs were then randomized into transtibial and medial portal groups. The femoral tunnel was drilled in each knee according to group. A bamboo skewer was placed in the femoral tunnel, and the knees underwent a second CT scan. Arthroscopic notchplasty was performed, and the femoral tunnels were redrilled. Radiographs confirmed placement, and the post-notchplasty tunnel was reamed with a 4-mm reamer. The knees underwent a third CT scan. CT scans compared femoral tunnel placement with the native ACL footprint before and after notchplasty. RESULTS: The post-notchplasty transtibial group revealed an average of 68.3% coverage of the native ACL femoral origin. The medial portal group revealed an average of 60.8% coverage, with 1 instance of perforation of the posterior cortex. There were no instances of perforation in the transtibial group. CONCLUSION: Both drilling techniques place the graft in an anatomically correct position. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Transtibial drilling of the femur can adequately place the entry tunnel at the origin of the ACL’s native footprint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555567
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45555672015-11-03 Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling Dugas, Jeffrey R. Pace, Jesse L. Bolt, Becky Wear, Shane A. Beason, David P. Cain, E. Lyle Orthop J Sports Med 25 BACKGROUND: Advocates of medial portal drilling claim that the transtibial technique results in a more vertical positioning of the graft, which could lead to subsequent failure and/or a residual pivot shift on postoperative examination. However, advocates of transtibial drilling state that with appropriate placement and adequate notchplasty, their technique places the graft in a more anatomically correct position on the wall, negating the resultant potential for pivot shift and early postoperative failure. HYPOTHESIS: Transtibial femoral drilling can adequately reproduce the femoral origin of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and place the graft in an anatomical position equivalent to medial portal drilling. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten matched-pair cadaveric knees (N = 20) were scanned using computed tomography (CT), and 3-dimensional images of the native ACL origin were reconstructed. The matched pairs were then randomized into transtibial and medial portal groups. The femoral tunnel was drilled in each knee according to group. A bamboo skewer was placed in the femoral tunnel, and the knees underwent a second CT scan. Arthroscopic notchplasty was performed, and the femoral tunnels were redrilled. Radiographs confirmed placement, and the post-notchplasty tunnel was reamed with a 4-mm reamer. The knees underwent a third CT scan. CT scans compared femoral tunnel placement with the native ACL footprint before and after notchplasty. RESULTS: The post-notchplasty transtibial group revealed an average of 68.3% coverage of the native ACL femoral origin. The medial portal group revealed an average of 60.8% coverage, with 1 instance of perforation of the posterior cortex. There were no instances of perforation in the transtibial group. CONCLUSION: Both drilling techniques place the graft in an anatomically correct position. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Transtibial drilling of the femur can adequately place the entry tunnel at the origin of the ACL’s native footprint. SAGE Publications 2014-03-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4555567/ /pubmed/26535307 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114525572 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm).
spellingShingle 25
Dugas, Jeffrey R.
Pace, Jesse L.
Bolt, Becky
Wear, Shane A.
Beason, David P.
Cain, E. Lyle
Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling
title Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling
title_full Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling
title_fullStr Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling
title_short Evaluation and Comparison of Femoral Tunnel Placement During Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography: Effect of Notchplasty on Transtibial and Medial Portal Drilling
title_sort evaluation and comparison of femoral tunnel placement during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using 3-dimensional computed tomography: effect of notchplasty on transtibial and medial portal drilling
topic 25
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555567/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535307
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114525572
work_keys_str_mv AT dugasjeffreyr evaluationandcomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusing3dimensionalcomputedtomographyeffectofnotchplastyontranstibialandmedialportaldrilling
AT pacejessel evaluationandcomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusing3dimensionalcomputedtomographyeffectofnotchplastyontranstibialandmedialportaldrilling
AT boltbecky evaluationandcomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusing3dimensionalcomputedtomographyeffectofnotchplastyontranstibialandmedialportaldrilling
AT wearshanea evaluationandcomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusing3dimensionalcomputedtomographyeffectofnotchplastyontranstibialandmedialportaldrilling
AT beasondavidp evaluationandcomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusing3dimensionalcomputedtomographyeffectofnotchplastyontranstibialandmedialportaldrilling
AT cainelyle evaluationandcomparisonoffemoraltunnelplacementduringanteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionusing3dimensionalcomputedtomographyeffectofnotchplastyontranstibialandmedialportaldrilling