Cargando…
Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score
BACKGROUND: Condition-specific questionnaires are important components in evaluation of outcomes of surgical interventions. No condition-specific study methodological quality questionnaire exists for evaluation of outcomes of articular cartilage surgery in the knee. PURPOSE: To develop a reliable an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113512606 |
_version_ | 1782388241065836544 |
---|---|
author | Harris, Joshua D. Erickson, Brandon J. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Abrams, Geoffrey D. McCormick, Frank M. Gupta, Anil K. Verma, Nikhil N. Bach, Bernard R. Cole, Brian J. |
author_facet | Harris, Joshua D. Erickson, Brandon J. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Abrams, Geoffrey D. McCormick, Frank M. Gupta, Anil K. Verma, Nikhil N. Bach, Bernard R. Cole, Brian J. |
author_sort | Harris, Joshua D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Condition-specific questionnaires are important components in evaluation of outcomes of surgical interventions. No condition-specific study methodological quality questionnaire exists for evaluation of outcomes of articular cartilage surgery in the knee. PURPOSE: To develop a reliable and valid knee articular cartilage–specific study methodological quality questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A stepwise, a priori–designed framework was created for development of a novel questionnaire. Relevant items to the topic were identified and extracted from a recent systematic review of 194 investigations of knee articular cartilage surgery. In addition, relevant items from existing generic study methodological quality questionnaires were identified. Items for a preliminary questionnaire were generated. Redundant and irrelevant items were eliminated, and acceptable items modified. The instrument was pretested and items weighed. The instrument, the MARK score (Methodological quality of ARticular cartilage studies of the Knee), was tested for validity (criterion validity) and reliability (inter- and intraobserver). RESULTS: A 19-item, 3-domain MARK score was developed. The 100-point scale score demonstrated face validity (focus group of 8 orthopaedic surgeons) and criterion validity (strong correlation to Cochrane Quality Assessment score and Modified Coleman Methodology Score). Interobserver reliability for the overall score was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.842), and for all individual items of the MARK score, acceptable to perfect (ICC, 0.70-1.000). Intraobserver reliability ICC assessed over a 3-week interval was strong for 2 reviewers (≥0.90). CONCLUSION: The MARK score is a valid and reliable knee articular cartilage condition–specific study methodological quality instrument. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This condition-specific questionnaire may be used to evaluate the quality of studies reporting outcomes of articular cartilage surgery in the knee. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555619 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45556192015-11-03 Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score Harris, Joshua D. Erickson, Brandon J. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Abrams, Geoffrey D. McCormick, Frank M. Gupta, Anil K. Verma, Nikhil N. Bach, Bernard R. Cole, Brian J. Orthop J Sports Med 45 BACKGROUND: Condition-specific questionnaires are important components in evaluation of outcomes of surgical interventions. No condition-specific study methodological quality questionnaire exists for evaluation of outcomes of articular cartilage surgery in the knee. PURPOSE: To develop a reliable and valid knee articular cartilage–specific study methodological quality questionnaire. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: A stepwise, a priori–designed framework was created for development of a novel questionnaire. Relevant items to the topic were identified and extracted from a recent systematic review of 194 investigations of knee articular cartilage surgery. In addition, relevant items from existing generic study methodological quality questionnaires were identified. Items for a preliminary questionnaire were generated. Redundant and irrelevant items were eliminated, and acceptable items modified. The instrument was pretested and items weighed. The instrument, the MARK score (Methodological quality of ARticular cartilage studies of the Knee), was tested for validity (criterion validity) and reliability (inter- and intraobserver). RESULTS: A 19-item, 3-domain MARK score was developed. The 100-point scale score demonstrated face validity (focus group of 8 orthopaedic surgeons) and criterion validity (strong correlation to Cochrane Quality Assessment score and Modified Coleman Methodology Score). Interobserver reliability for the overall score was good (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC], 0.842), and for all individual items of the MARK score, acceptable to perfect (ICC, 0.70-1.000). Intraobserver reliability ICC assessed over a 3-week interval was strong for 2 reviewers (≥0.90). CONCLUSION: The MARK score is a valid and reliable knee articular cartilage condition–specific study methodological quality instrument. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This condition-specific questionnaire may be used to evaluate the quality of studies reporting outcomes of articular cartilage surgery in the knee. SAGE Publications 2014-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4555619/ /pubmed/26535295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113512606 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | 45 Harris, Joshua D. Erickson, Brandon J. Cvetanovich, Gregory L. Abrams, Geoffrey D. McCormick, Frank M. Gupta, Anil K. Verma, Nikhil N. Bach, Bernard R. Cole, Brian J. Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score |
title | Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score |
title_full | Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score |
title_fullStr | Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score |
title_full_unstemmed | Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score |
title_short | Development of a Valid and Reliable Knee Articular Cartilage Condition–Specific Study Methodological Quality Score |
title_sort | development of a valid and reliable knee articular cartilage condition–specific study methodological quality score |
topic | 45 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555619/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967113512606 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisjoshuad developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT ericksonbrandonj developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT cvetanovichgregoryl developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT abramsgeoffreyd developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT mccormickfrankm developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT guptaanilk developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT vermanikhiln developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT bachbernardr developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore AT colebrianj developmentofavalidandreliablekneearticularcartilageconditionspecificstudymethodologicalqualityscore |