Cargando…
Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint
BACKGROUND: It is common to place the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial tunnel with a transtibial technique using a guide that attempts to place the center of the tunnel 1 to 1.5 cm distal to the tibiofemoral joint. It is unknown how well this technique will re-create the native tibial footpr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114523384 |
_version_ | 1782388241523015680 |
---|---|
author | Tompkins, Marc Keller, Thomas C. Milewski, Matthew D. Gaskin, Cree M. Brockmeier, Stephen F. Hart, Joseph M. Miller, Mark D. |
author_facet | Tompkins, Marc Keller, Thomas C. Milewski, Matthew D. Gaskin, Cree M. Brockmeier, Stephen F. Hart, Joseph M. Miller, Mark D. |
author_sort | Tompkins, Marc |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is common to place the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial tunnel with a transtibial technique using a guide that attempts to place the center of the tunnel 1 to 1.5 cm distal to the tibiofemoral joint. It is unknown how well this technique will re-create the native tibial footprint of the PCL. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement using a transtibial technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees from 10 donors underwent arthroscopic transtibial drilling of the tibial tunnel with use of a posteromedial portal for visualization. The transtibial guide was rested flush against the tibial spines to allow for the guide to be as distal as possible, which was between 1 and 1.5 cm distal to the tibiofemoral joint line. Using this technique, an attempt was made to place the tibial tunnels as close to the center of the PCL footprint as possible. All knees underwent computed tomography both pre- and postoperatively with a previously reported technique optimized for ligament evaluation. This allowed comparison of the anatomic PCL tibial footprint to the tibial tunnel aperture. The percentage of tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint as well as the distance from the center of the tunnel aperture to the center of the footprint was measured. RESULTS: The percentage of tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint was 45.9% ± 23.1%. The distance from the center of the tibial tunnel aperture to the center of the tibial PCL footprint was 6.4 ± 2.3 mm. The tunnels were almost always (9/10) distal (or inferior) to the native footprint and either slightly lateral (5/10) or centered (5/10) in a medial to lateral direction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that using the transtibial drilling technique in the tibia for PCL reconstruction places approximately half of the tibial tunnel aperture within the tibial footprint. Generally, the tunnel is distal to the footprint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Consideration should be given to the fact that, using this transtibial technique, the tibial tunnel aperture is generally not placed in the center of the footprint. This may not be a negative issue, however, since there are other potential advantages from distal tunnel placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45556212015-11-03 Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint Tompkins, Marc Keller, Thomas C. Milewski, Matthew D. Gaskin, Cree M. Brockmeier, Stephen F. Hart, Joseph M. Miller, Mark D. Orthop J Sports Med 26 BACKGROUND: It is common to place the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) tibial tunnel with a transtibial technique using a guide that attempts to place the center of the tunnel 1 to 1.5 cm distal to the tibiofemoral joint. It is unknown how well this technique will re-create the native tibial footprint of the PCL. PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of tibial tunnel placement using a transtibial technique. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees from 10 donors underwent arthroscopic transtibial drilling of the tibial tunnel with use of a posteromedial portal for visualization. The transtibial guide was rested flush against the tibial spines to allow for the guide to be as distal as possible, which was between 1 and 1.5 cm distal to the tibiofemoral joint line. Using this technique, an attempt was made to place the tibial tunnels as close to the center of the PCL footprint as possible. All knees underwent computed tomography both pre- and postoperatively with a previously reported technique optimized for ligament evaluation. This allowed comparison of the anatomic PCL tibial footprint to the tibial tunnel aperture. The percentage of tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint as well as the distance from the center of the tunnel aperture to the center of the footprint was measured. RESULTS: The percentage of tunnel aperture contained within the native footprint was 45.9% ± 23.1%. The distance from the center of the tibial tunnel aperture to the center of the tibial PCL footprint was 6.4 ± 2.3 mm. The tunnels were almost always (9/10) distal (or inferior) to the native footprint and either slightly lateral (5/10) or centered (5/10) in a medial to lateral direction. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that using the transtibial drilling technique in the tibia for PCL reconstruction places approximately half of the tibial tunnel aperture within the tibial footprint. Generally, the tunnel is distal to the footprint. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Consideration should be given to the fact that, using this transtibial technique, the tibial tunnel aperture is generally not placed in the center of the footprint. This may not be a negative issue, however, since there are other potential advantages from distal tunnel placement. SAGE Publications 2014-02-24 /pmc/articles/PMC4555621/ /pubmed/26535303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114523384 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (http://www.uk.sagepub.com/aboutus/openaccess.htm). |
spellingShingle | 26 Tompkins, Marc Keller, Thomas C. Milewski, Matthew D. Gaskin, Cree M. Brockmeier, Stephen F. Hart, Joseph M. Miller, Mark D. Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint |
title | Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint |
title_full | Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint |
title_fullStr | Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint |
title_full_unstemmed | Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint |
title_short | Transtibial Tunnel Placement in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How It Relates to the Anatomic Footprint |
title_sort | transtibial tunnel placement in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how it relates to the anatomic footprint |
topic | 26 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555621/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26535303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967114523384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tompkinsmarc transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint AT kellerthomasc transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint AT milewskimatthewd transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint AT gaskincreem transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint AT brockmeierstephenf transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint AT hartjosephm transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint AT millermarkd transtibialtunnelplacementinposteriorcruciateligamentreconstructionhowitrelatestotheanatomicfootprint |