Cargando…

Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization

Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arditi, G., Weiss, A. J., Yovel, Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225
_version_ 1782388261848612864
author Arditi, G.
Weiss, A. J.
Yovel, Y.
author_facet Arditi, G.
Weiss, A. J.
Yovel, Y.
author_sort Arditi, G.
collection PubMed
description Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammals rely on the temporal and amplitude differences between the sound signals arriving at their two ears, as well as on the spectral cues available in the signal arriving at a single ear to localize a sound source. Most mammals rely on passive hearing and are thus limited by the acoustic characteristics of the emitted sound. Echolocating bats emit sound to perceive their environment. They can, therefore, affect the frequency spectrum of the echoes they must localize. The biosonar sound beam of a bat is directional, spreading different frequencies into different directions. Here, we analyse mathematically the spatial information that is provided by the beam and could be used to improve sound localization. We hypothesize how bats could improve sound localization by altering their echolocation signal design or by increasing their mouth gape (the size of the sound emitter) as they, indeed, do in nature. Finally, we also reveal a trade-off according to which increasing the echolocation signal's frequency improves the accuracy of sound localization but might result in undesired large localization errors under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555857
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45558572015-09-10 Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization Arditi, G. Weiss, A. J. Yovel, Y. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammals rely on the temporal and amplitude differences between the sound signals arriving at their two ears, as well as on the spectral cues available in the signal arriving at a single ear to localize a sound source. Most mammals rely on passive hearing and are thus limited by the acoustic characteristics of the emitted sound. Echolocating bats emit sound to perceive their environment. They can, therefore, affect the frequency spectrum of the echoes they must localize. The biosonar sound beam of a bat is directional, spreading different frequencies into different directions. Here, we analyse mathematically the spatial information that is provided by the beam and could be used to improve sound localization. We hypothesize how bats could improve sound localization by altering their echolocation signal design or by increasing their mouth gape (the size of the sound emitter) as they, indeed, do in nature. Finally, we also reveal a trade-off according to which increasing the echolocation signal's frequency improves the accuracy of sound localization but might result in undesired large localization errors under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions. The Royal Society Publishing 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4555857/ /pubmed/26361552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Arditi, G.
Weiss, A. J.
Yovel, Y.
Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
title Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
title_full Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
title_fullStr Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
title_full_unstemmed Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
title_short Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
title_sort object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555857/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361552
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225
work_keys_str_mv AT arditig objectlocalizationusingabiosonarbeamhowopeningyourmouthimproveslocalization
AT weissaj objectlocalizationusingabiosonarbeamhowopeningyourmouthimproveslocalization
AT yovely objectlocalizationusingabiosonarbeamhowopeningyourmouthimproveslocalization