Cargando…
Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization
Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammal...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society Publishing
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225 |
_version_ | 1782388261848612864 |
---|---|
author | Arditi, G. Weiss, A. J. Yovel, Y. |
author_facet | Arditi, G. Weiss, A. J. Yovel, Y. |
author_sort | Arditi, G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammals rely on the temporal and amplitude differences between the sound signals arriving at their two ears, as well as on the spectral cues available in the signal arriving at a single ear to localize a sound source. Most mammals rely on passive hearing and are thus limited by the acoustic characteristics of the emitted sound. Echolocating bats emit sound to perceive their environment. They can, therefore, affect the frequency spectrum of the echoes they must localize. The biosonar sound beam of a bat is directional, spreading different frequencies into different directions. Here, we analyse mathematically the spatial information that is provided by the beam and could be used to improve sound localization. We hypothesize how bats could improve sound localization by altering their echolocation signal design or by increasing their mouth gape (the size of the sound emitter) as they, indeed, do in nature. Finally, we also reveal a trade-off according to which increasing the echolocation signal's frequency improves the accuracy of sound localization but might result in undesired large localization errors under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Royal Society Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45558572015-09-10 Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization Arditi, G. Weiss, A. J. Yovel, Y. R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Determining the location of a sound source is crucial for survival. Both predators and prey usually produce sound while moving, revealing valuable information about their presence and location. Animals have thus evolved morphological and neural adaptations allowing precise sound localization. Mammals rely on the temporal and amplitude differences between the sound signals arriving at their two ears, as well as on the spectral cues available in the signal arriving at a single ear to localize a sound source. Most mammals rely on passive hearing and are thus limited by the acoustic characteristics of the emitted sound. Echolocating bats emit sound to perceive their environment. They can, therefore, affect the frequency spectrum of the echoes they must localize. The biosonar sound beam of a bat is directional, spreading different frequencies into different directions. Here, we analyse mathematically the spatial information that is provided by the beam and could be used to improve sound localization. We hypothesize how bats could improve sound localization by altering their echolocation signal design or by increasing their mouth gape (the size of the sound emitter) as they, indeed, do in nature. Finally, we also reveal a trade-off according to which increasing the echolocation signal's frequency improves the accuracy of sound localization but might result in undesired large localization errors under low signal-to-noise ratio conditions. The Royal Society Publishing 2015-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4555857/ /pubmed/26361552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225 Text en © 2015 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Biology (Whole Organism) Arditi, G. Weiss, A. J. Yovel, Y. Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
title | Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
title_full | Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
title_fullStr | Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
title_full_unstemmed | Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
title_short | Object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
title_sort | object localization using a biosonar beam: how opening your mouth improves localization |
topic | Biology (Whole Organism) |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26361552 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.150225 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arditig objectlocalizationusingabiosonarbeamhowopeningyourmouthimproveslocalization AT weissaj objectlocalizationusingabiosonarbeamhowopeningyourmouthimproveslocalization AT yovely objectlocalizationusingabiosonarbeamhowopeningyourmouthimproveslocalization |