Cargando…

Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas

AIMS: The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharya, Anirudh, Adwani, Dwarkadas, Adwani, Nitin, Sharma, Vijay
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389029
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161052
_version_ 1782388276012777472
author Bhattacharya, Anirudh
Adwani, Dwarkadas
Adwani, Nitin
Sharma, Vijay
author_facet Bhattacharya, Anirudh
Adwani, Dwarkadas
Adwani, Nitin
Sharma, Vijay
author_sort Bhattacharya, Anirudh
collection PubMed
description AIMS: The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size or histologic grade, but N0/N1 were taken for selective neck dissection (SND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent SND for oral carcinoma were analyzed for the relation of the site, size, and histological grade of malignancy with metastatic involvement to Level IIB nodes. Level IIB nodes were dissected separately and sent for histopathological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data were entered in custom written software in Excel (MS office 2007, Windows XP) and the data were analyzed using statistical software STATA version 10.0. The statistical test used for the analysis of the result was Chi-square test. The critical level of statistical significance chosen was P < 0.05. RESULTS: Only 2 of 30 patients (6.6%) had the involvement of Level IIB neck nodes. There was no relation between the site, size, and histologic grade of primary tumor with the metastasis to Level IIB. The Level IIA nodes were positive in both the positive cases of Level IIB. CONCLUSIONS: For tumors in oral cavity (N0/N1), while performing elective or therapeutic SND the dissection of Level IIB nodes could be omitted as it will provide significant decrease in operative time and also less of spinal accessory nerve trauma-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45559422015-09-18 Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas Bhattacharya, Anirudh Adwani, Dwarkadas Adwani, Nitin Sharma, Vijay Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Prospective Study AIMS: The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size or histologic grade, but N0/N1 were taken for selective neck dissection (SND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent SND for oral carcinoma were analyzed for the relation of the site, size, and histological grade of malignancy with metastatic involvement to Level IIB nodes. Level IIB nodes were dissected separately and sent for histopathological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data were entered in custom written software in Excel (MS office 2007, Windows XP) and the data were analyzed using statistical software STATA version 10.0. The statistical test used for the analysis of the result was Chi-square test. The critical level of statistical significance chosen was P < 0.05. RESULTS: Only 2 of 30 patients (6.6%) had the involvement of Level IIB neck nodes. There was no relation between the site, size, and histologic grade of primary tumor with the metastasis to Level IIB. The Level IIA nodes were positive in both the positive cases of Level IIB. CONCLUSIONS: For tumors in oral cavity (N0/N1), while performing elective or therapeutic SND the dissection of Level IIB nodes could be omitted as it will provide significant decrease in operative time and also less of spinal accessory nerve trauma-related complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4555942/ /pubmed/26389029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161052 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article - Prospective Study
Bhattacharya, Anirudh
Adwani, Dwarkadas
Adwani, Nitin
Sharma, Vijay
Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
title Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
title_full Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
title_fullStr Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
title_short Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
title_sort is it worthy? removal of level iib nodes during selective neck dissection (i-iii) for oral carcinomas
topic Original Article - Prospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389029
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161052
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyaanirudh isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas
AT adwanidwarkadas isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas
AT adwaninitin isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas
AT sharmavijay isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas