Cargando…
Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas
AIMS: The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161052 |
_version_ | 1782388276012777472 |
---|---|
author | Bhattacharya, Anirudh Adwani, Dwarkadas Adwani, Nitin Sharma, Vijay |
author_facet | Bhattacharya, Anirudh Adwani, Dwarkadas Adwani, Nitin Sharma, Vijay |
author_sort | Bhattacharya, Anirudh |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size or histologic grade, but N0/N1 were taken for selective neck dissection (SND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent SND for oral carcinoma were analyzed for the relation of the site, size, and histological grade of malignancy with metastatic involvement to Level IIB nodes. Level IIB nodes were dissected separately and sent for histopathological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data were entered in custom written software in Excel (MS office 2007, Windows XP) and the data were analyzed using statistical software STATA version 10.0. The statistical test used for the analysis of the result was Chi-square test. The critical level of statistical significance chosen was P < 0.05. RESULTS: Only 2 of 30 patients (6.6%) had the involvement of Level IIB neck nodes. There was no relation between the site, size, and histologic grade of primary tumor with the metastasis to Level IIB. The Level IIA nodes were positive in both the positive cases of Level IIB. CONCLUSIONS: For tumors in oral cavity (N0/N1), while performing elective or therapeutic SND the dissection of Level IIB nodes could be omitted as it will provide significant decrease in operative time and also less of spinal accessory nerve trauma-related complications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555942 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45559422015-09-18 Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas Bhattacharya, Anirudh Adwani, Dwarkadas Adwani, Nitin Sharma, Vijay Ann Maxillofac Surg Original Article - Prospective Study AIMS: The aim was to correlate the incidence of metastasis to Level IIB of neck lymph nodes (LNs) for oral cavity carcinomas with the site, size, and histological grade of tumor. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Total 30 patients of either sex, with biopsy-proven oral squamous cell carcinoma of any site, size or histologic grade, but N0/N1 were taken for selective neck dissection (SND). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients who underwent SND for oral carcinoma were analyzed for the relation of the site, size, and histological grade of malignancy with metastatic involvement to Level IIB nodes. Level IIB nodes were dissected separately and sent for histopathological examination. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: The data were entered in custom written software in Excel (MS office 2007, Windows XP) and the data were analyzed using statistical software STATA version 10.0. The statistical test used for the analysis of the result was Chi-square test. The critical level of statistical significance chosen was P < 0.05. RESULTS: Only 2 of 30 patients (6.6%) had the involvement of Level IIB neck nodes. There was no relation between the site, size, and histologic grade of primary tumor with the metastasis to Level IIB. The Level IIA nodes were positive in both the positive cases of Level IIB. CONCLUSIONS: For tumors in oral cavity (N0/N1), while performing elective or therapeutic SND the dissection of Level IIB nodes could be omitted as it will provide significant decrease in operative time and also less of spinal accessory nerve trauma-related complications. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4555942/ /pubmed/26389029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161052 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article - Prospective Study Bhattacharya, Anirudh Adwani, Dwarkadas Adwani, Nitin Sharma, Vijay Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas |
title | Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas |
title_full | Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas |
title_fullStr | Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas |
title_short | Is it worthy? Removal of level IIB nodes during selective neck dissection (I-III) for oral carcinomas |
title_sort | is it worthy? removal of level iib nodes during selective neck dissection (i-iii) for oral carcinomas |
topic | Original Article - Prospective Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555942/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389029 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhattacharyaanirudh isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas AT adwanidwarkadas isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas AT adwaninitin isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas AT sharmavijay isitworthyremovalofleveliibnodesduringselectiveneckdissectioniiiifororalcarcinomas |