Cargando…

Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects

The primary goals of craniofacial reconstruction include the restoration of the form, function, and facial esthetics, and in the case of pediatric patients, respect for craniofacial growth. The surgeon, however, faces several challenges when attempting a reconstructive cranioplasty. For that reason,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Teven, Chad M., Fisher, Sean, Ameer, Guillermo A., He, Tong-Chuan, Reid, Russell R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389027
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161044
_version_ 1782388277138948096
author Teven, Chad M.
Fisher, Sean
Ameer, Guillermo A.
He, Tong-Chuan
Reid, Russell R.
author_facet Teven, Chad M.
Fisher, Sean
Ameer, Guillermo A.
He, Tong-Chuan
Reid, Russell R.
author_sort Teven, Chad M.
collection PubMed
description The primary goals of craniofacial reconstruction include the restoration of the form, function, and facial esthetics, and in the case of pediatric patients, respect for craniofacial growth. The surgeon, however, faces several challenges when attempting a reconstructive cranioplasty. For that reason, craniofacial defect repair often requires sophisticated treatment strategies and multidisciplinary input. In the ideal situation, autologous tissue similar in structure and function to that which is missing can be utilized for repair. In the context of the craniofacial skeleton, autologous cranial bone, or secondarily rib, iliac crest, or scapular bone, is most favorable. Often, this option is limited by the finite supply of available bone. Therefore, alternative strategies to repair craniofacial defects are necessary. In the field of regenerative medicine, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising concept, and several methods of bone engineering are currently under investigation. A growth factor-based approach utilizing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) has demonstrated stimulatory effects on cranial bone and defect repair. When combined with cell-based and matrix-based models, regenerative goals can be optimized. This manuscript intends to review recent investigations of tissue engineering models used for the repair of craniofacial defects with a focus on the role of BMPs, scaffold materials, and novel cell lines. When sufficient autologous bone is not available, safe and effective strategies to engineer bone would allow the surgeon to meet the reconstructive goals of the craniofacial skeleton.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4555947
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-45559472015-09-18 Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects Teven, Chad M. Fisher, Sean Ameer, Guillermo A. He, Tong-Chuan Reid, Russell R. Ann Maxillofac Surg Invited Review Article The primary goals of craniofacial reconstruction include the restoration of the form, function, and facial esthetics, and in the case of pediatric patients, respect for craniofacial growth. The surgeon, however, faces several challenges when attempting a reconstructive cranioplasty. For that reason, craniofacial defect repair often requires sophisticated treatment strategies and multidisciplinary input. In the ideal situation, autologous tissue similar in structure and function to that which is missing can be utilized for repair. In the context of the craniofacial skeleton, autologous cranial bone, or secondarily rib, iliac crest, or scapular bone, is most favorable. Often, this option is limited by the finite supply of available bone. Therefore, alternative strategies to repair craniofacial defects are necessary. In the field of regenerative medicine, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising concept, and several methods of bone engineering are currently under investigation. A growth factor-based approach utilizing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) has demonstrated stimulatory effects on cranial bone and defect repair. When combined with cell-based and matrix-based models, regenerative goals can be optimized. This manuscript intends to review recent investigations of tissue engineering models used for the repair of craniofacial defects with a focus on the role of BMPs, scaffold materials, and novel cell lines. When sufficient autologous bone is not available, safe and effective strategies to engineer bone would allow the surgeon to meet the reconstructive goals of the craniofacial skeleton. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4555947/ /pubmed/26389027 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161044 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Invited Review Article
Teven, Chad M.
Fisher, Sean
Ameer, Guillermo A.
He, Tong-Chuan
Reid, Russell R.
Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
title Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
title_full Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
title_fullStr Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
title_full_unstemmed Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
title_short Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
title_sort biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
topic Invited Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555947/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389027
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161044
work_keys_str_mv AT tevenchadm biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects
AT fishersean biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects
AT ameerguillermoa biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects
AT hetongchuan biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects
AT reidrussellr biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects