Cargando…
Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects
The primary goals of craniofacial reconstruction include the restoration of the form, function, and facial esthetics, and in the case of pediatric patients, respect for craniofacial growth. The surgeon, however, faces several challenges when attempting a reconstructive cranioplasty. For that reason,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389027 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161044 |
_version_ | 1782388277138948096 |
---|---|
author | Teven, Chad M. Fisher, Sean Ameer, Guillermo A. He, Tong-Chuan Reid, Russell R. |
author_facet | Teven, Chad M. Fisher, Sean Ameer, Guillermo A. He, Tong-Chuan Reid, Russell R. |
author_sort | Teven, Chad M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The primary goals of craniofacial reconstruction include the restoration of the form, function, and facial esthetics, and in the case of pediatric patients, respect for craniofacial growth. The surgeon, however, faces several challenges when attempting a reconstructive cranioplasty. For that reason, craniofacial defect repair often requires sophisticated treatment strategies and multidisciplinary input. In the ideal situation, autologous tissue similar in structure and function to that which is missing can be utilized for repair. In the context of the craniofacial skeleton, autologous cranial bone, or secondarily rib, iliac crest, or scapular bone, is most favorable. Often, this option is limited by the finite supply of available bone. Therefore, alternative strategies to repair craniofacial defects are necessary. In the field of regenerative medicine, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising concept, and several methods of bone engineering are currently under investigation. A growth factor-based approach utilizing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) has demonstrated stimulatory effects on cranial bone and defect repair. When combined with cell-based and matrix-based models, regenerative goals can be optimized. This manuscript intends to review recent investigations of tissue engineering models used for the repair of craniofacial defects with a focus on the role of BMPs, scaffold materials, and novel cell lines. When sufficient autologous bone is not available, safe and effective strategies to engineer bone would allow the surgeon to meet the reconstructive goals of the craniofacial skeleton. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4555947 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-45559472015-09-18 Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects Teven, Chad M. Fisher, Sean Ameer, Guillermo A. He, Tong-Chuan Reid, Russell R. Ann Maxillofac Surg Invited Review Article The primary goals of craniofacial reconstruction include the restoration of the form, function, and facial esthetics, and in the case of pediatric patients, respect for craniofacial growth. The surgeon, however, faces several challenges when attempting a reconstructive cranioplasty. For that reason, craniofacial defect repair often requires sophisticated treatment strategies and multidisciplinary input. In the ideal situation, autologous tissue similar in structure and function to that which is missing can be utilized for repair. In the context of the craniofacial skeleton, autologous cranial bone, or secondarily rib, iliac crest, or scapular bone, is most favorable. Often, this option is limited by the finite supply of available bone. Therefore, alternative strategies to repair craniofacial defects are necessary. In the field of regenerative medicine, tissue engineering has emerged as a promising concept, and several methods of bone engineering are currently under investigation. A growth factor-based approach utilizing bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) has demonstrated stimulatory effects on cranial bone and defect repair. When combined with cell-based and matrix-based models, regenerative goals can be optimized. This manuscript intends to review recent investigations of tissue engineering models used for the repair of craniofacial defects with a focus on the role of BMPs, scaffold materials, and novel cell lines. When sufficient autologous bone is not available, safe and effective strategies to engineer bone would allow the surgeon to meet the reconstructive goals of the craniofacial skeleton. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2015 /pmc/articles/PMC4555947/ /pubmed/26389027 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161044 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Invited Review Article Teven, Chad M. Fisher, Sean Ameer, Guillermo A. He, Tong-Chuan Reid, Russell R. Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
title | Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
title_full | Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
title_fullStr | Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
title_full_unstemmed | Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
title_short | Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
title_sort | biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects |
topic | Invited Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555947/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26389027 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2231-0746.161044 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tevenchadm biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects AT fishersean biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects AT ameerguillermoa biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects AT hetongchuan biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects AT reidrussellr biomimeticapproachestocomplexcraniofacialdefects |